Can Republicans show me the part of the Constitution that requires publishing?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

CDA 230 is allowed, even if the intermediaries makes editorial decisions, and even requires a good faith attempt to track down illegal material. An example of the later is Kim Dotcom who hosted user content that violated copyright laws, and (allegedly) did not make a good faith effort to take it down.

Let's use JPP as an example. JPP can ban me based on their own editorial decisions, and keep CDA 230 protections. JPP is not liable if I post something wrong. But they are liable if they do not make a good faith effort to police their content.

I said "more strict than the government". you are defending "the same strictness as government".

try again fuckidiot.

[War=Peace]

Projection

Incorrect.

[Walt]

Whether not it’s an antitrust issue is a different question. Wasn’t even Pocahontas advocating that that the Big Three be broken up?

Antitrust is not going to get trump back on twitter. It certainly will not get Hawley a book deal.

[Darth Omar]

Antitrust is not going to get trump back on twitter. It certainly will not get Hawley a book deal.

If you think this begins and ends with Trump you are uniformed, Alter.

[Callinectes]

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU LEFTARD FASCISTS SO DAMNED AFRAID OF???

[Concart]

same clause that protects wedding cakes......

I would tell you to keep your day job, but you claim to be a lawyer, so in your case, I'd just head back to school. Not the same at all. Not even close. You are confused and conflating completely different issues. One is (allegedly) a free speech issue, the other is religious freedom issue. Seriously, you appear to have a sixth grade level of knowledge about the law.

[Concart]

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU LEFTARD FASCISTS SO DAMNED AFRAID OF???

That you fucking knuckledragging morons are plotting attacks against the country. BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING.

[PostmodernProphet]

One is (allegedly) a free speech issue, the other is religious freedom issue.

gosh, I wish we had a constitution that covered both.......

[Concart]

gosh, I wish we had a constitution that covered both.......

We do. They are not, as you claim, the 'same clause'.

Oops.

[Damocles]

It would be the same part that forces folks to make cakes.

[PostmodernProphet]

We do. They are not, as you claim, the 'same clause'.

Oops.

you really need to stop sucking on dicks while you post......it distracts you from what is actually happening......

[danielpalos]

Republicans have recently claimed that the Constitution allows the government to force publishers to publish things. The publishers also have to pay politician book authors large amounts of money for these books.

I always thought one of the freedoms of the press was the freedom not to publish something. If a book publisher does not want to publish a book, they are free to not publish the book. They do have to pay the contractual obligations, but not the full advance. Likewise, Twitter does not have to publish trump's anti-American tweets.

There are more possible internet addresses than there are atoms in the universe. You want to setup your own servers, go ahead and do it.

Data scientist Rebekah Jones did just that. First Republicans tried to get her deplatformed, but she had her own server. Then they tried to get internet service cutoff to her home, but could not do that legally. Finally, they sent police into her home to threaten her family, and steal her server... And she bought new server. A server costs less than a thousand dollars.

Right wingers are just plain political hypocrites who have a problem when Others do unto Them as do are Happy to do unto Others. Why should any person of morals take them seriously in abortion threads?

[Bulletbob]

Republicans have recently claimed that the Constitution allows the government to force publishers to publish things. The publishers also have to pay politician book authors large amounts of money for these books.

I always thought one of the freedoms of the press was the freedom not to publish something. If a book publisher does not want to publish a book, they are free to not publish the book. They do have to pay the contractual obligations, but not the full advance. Likewise, Twitter does not have to publish trump's anti-American tweets.

There are more possible internet addresses than there are atoms in the universe. You want to setup your own servers, go ahead and do it.

Data scientist Rebekah Jones did just that. First Republicans tried to get her deplatformed, but she had her own server. Then they tried to get internet service cutoff to her home, but could not do that legally. Finally, they sent police into her home to threaten her family, and steal her server... And she bought new server. A server costs less than a thousand dollars.

I have never heard that claim you got a link

[CFM]

Incorrect.

I wouldn't worry about her. She has such tender feelings, if you tell her she's wrong, she's likely to cry.

[CFM]

Right wingers are just plain political hypocrites who have a problem when Others do unto Them as do are Happy to do unto Others. Why should any person of morals take them seriously in abortion threads?

When someone supports abortion on demand, they're a hypocrite if they claim to have morals.