"silencing people is what happens in China" (Nikki Haley)

[anatta]

Just plain political hypocrites. I get banned by right wingers all the time. They don't care about our Constitution or our First Amendment, they prefer to just love their guns.

lol.. what RW's are "banning you all the time"

[archives]

So, they become the arbiters of free speech hum? No trial, no jury, no defense. Simply Off to the internet gulag with you! if you dare offend them. I find their selective outrage outrageous.

On their platform, yes, they can become the “arbiters of speech,” book publishers don’t have to print every manuscript someone sends them do they? They gave their reasons, and you may not agree with them, others do, speech has never been absolute

[reagansghost]

why did they also ban Sidney Powell ? Michael Flynn ? maria bartiromo? as well?
They wernt there or said anything.
Twitter is fascist, FB not much better -and while it's not a first amendment issue it does act to silence free speech

No matter what your politics, that shows the fascist intent and execution of these platforms

'free speech' has limitations, why can't you figure that out retard?

also, why do you hate capitalists protecting their businesses?

[Darth Omar]

Stop crying, as I just told one of your comrades, the social platforms explained why they banned Trump, after Wednesday, they saw his messages as a potential to inspire violence.

And forget the irrelevant autocratic comparisons, as you Trumpkins love to say, show us in the Constitution where it says someone has the right to tweet

Spin it all you want but silencing is silencing.

The permanent in permanent ban is all you need to know.

[blackascoal]

Fuck Nikki Haley. Just another enabler running for the exit sign.

No one has a right to social media. Don’t play by the rules, you get your ass kicked off and getting kicked off Twitter does not equate to silencing anyone, especially for the POTUS. There are about a zillion mics and podiums he could step up to and tell lies to if he wasn’t such a fucking coward.

[moon]

Yeah- say the people that wanted to make criticism of Izraeli fascism illegal- and support for it mandatory.

[cloud9]

Nikki Haley trolled the UN hard, she wonders why everyone doesn't just keep talking like herself. ��

[archives]

why did they also ban Sidney Powell ? Michael Flynn ? maria bartiromo? as well?
They wernt there or said anything.
Twitter is fascist, FB not much better -and while it's not a first amendment issue it does act to silence free speech

No matter what your politics, that shows the fascist intent and execution of these platforms

If they did, probably for the same reasons, spreading lies that they see have the potential to inspire violence, after watching the events of last Wednesday, Flynn’s calls for the need for martial law raises alarms

Not fascist, they are a private entity, if it was a bad decision, they will get hurt in the marketplace, you people are just upset cause social media is just about the only way Trump can communicate, it’s his shortcoming

[reagansghost]

Fuck Nikki Haley. Just another enabler running for the exit sign.

No one has a right to social media. Don’t play by the rules, you get your ass kicked off and getting kicked off Twitter does not equate to silencing anyone, especially for the POTUS. There are about a zillion mics and podiums he could step up to and tell lies to if he wasn’t such a fucking coward.

Haley is an embarrassment to her amoral party, even those loons can't stand her

[archives]

Spin it all you want but silencing is silencing.

The permanent in permanent ban is all you need to know.

And there is nothing wrong with them silencing Trump, or anyone else they deem undesirable, the spin is on the right, they are only upset cause it is the only means Trump has to express his views, it is Trump’s own fault he is so limited

[Darth Omar]

And there is nothing wrong with them silencing Trump, or anyone else they deem undesirable, the spin is on the right, they are only upset cause it is the only means Trump has to express his views, it is Trump’s own fault he is so limited

You mean there’s nothing illegal about it.

It flies square in the face of *the principle* of free speech.

[anatta]

On their platform, yes, they can become the “arbiters of speech,” book publishers don’t have to print every manuscript someone sends them do they? They gave their reasons, and you may not agree with them, others do, speech has never been absolute

why did they also ban Sidney Powell ? Michael Flynn ? maria bartiromo? as well?
They wernt there or said anything.

..

[archives]

You mean there’s nothing illegal about it.

It flies square in the face of the *the principle* of free speech.

No it doesn’t, the social media platforms are private entities, they can edit as they choose, and they gave a clear explanation for the ban, not about free speech, Limbaugh doesn’t have to air every person who calls his show does he?

[anatta]

Fuck Nikki Haley. Just another enabler running for the exit sign.

No one has a right to social media. Don’t play by the rules, you get your ass kicked off and getting kicked off Twitter does not equate to silencing anyone, especially for the POTUS. There are about a zillion mics and podiums he could step up to and tell lies to if he wasn’t such a fucking coward.

well she is a REPUBLICAN so your mind cant process the distinctions -no problem

my concern is the arbitrary and capricious nature of banning. i'm sure you get the idea that social media
is the new so called "town square" -where instead of "getting on our soapbox" we log in to communicate

It's not a healthy democracy where that is impeded -we need full political discourse

[archives]

..

As I said, if they did, probably for the same reasons, spreading lies that they see have the potential to inspire violence, after watching the events of last Wednesday, Flynn’s calls for the need for martial law raises alarms