Video of Ashli Babbit (best angle, shooter seen)

[zappasguitar]

because the 911 operator never relayed that part to the officers. the officers were told that he was threatening people in the park with a gun.

why did you leave that out?

he had what they thought was a gun based in the 911 dispatch. Ashli had no weapon, yet you cheer her death.

https://www.cleveland.com/metro/2017...aker_susp.html

I think the 911 operator should be permanently fired and the department sued by the rice family.

but the cops rolling up on a report of a person menacing with a gun?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hooting-police

here you see the kid brandishing and menacing people as the cops rolled up, after they were told by 911 dispatch that a man with a gun was menacing people.

the 911 operator is at fault. not the cops who for all they knew was rolling up on an active shooter situation.

that's called being objective. now, explain why these cops were wrong to shoot Tamir rice based on the information they recieved about an armed person menacing with a gun, but the capitol police employee was right shooting an unarmed protestor.

Splain dat shit.

So,

Cop shoots white woman = Cops are evil and need to be prosecuted.

Cop shoots black child = Cops are innocent and shouldn't be prosecuted.

Understood.

Thank you for so clearly explaining your hypocrisy.

[zappasguitar]

RQAA. Like everything else, you simply deny what is there, troll.

Like every other time you've been asked, you can't prove what you claim.

[zappasguitar]

Funny how your lies are not making Trump supporters go away. They know what you are.

My comments have showcased your refusal to provide corroboration to back up your claims.

I don't want you to go away.

I derive great pleasure from being able to repeatedly highlight your hypocrisy.

[Underdog]

So,

Cop shoots white woman = Cops are evil and need to be prosecuted.

Cop shoots black child = Cops are innocent and shouldn't be prosecuted.

Understood.

Thank you for so clearly explaining your hypocrisy.

1. no cops should not shoot unarmed citizens.

2. no cops should not shoot unarmed citizens.


you thinks


1. ok for cops to shoot unarmed capitol prostestor

2. not ok for cops to shoot a person reported as menacing people with a gun who is on video pointing replica gun at people.

[Getin the ring]

murder 1

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Seriously? I don't recall a 12 year old storming illegally storming a gov't facility within a rampaging mob and trying to breach a barricade while being told by armed guards NOT to so, do you?

Here genius, get a clue as to why there is no comparison

https://www.cleveland.com/court-just..._breakdow.html

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/...amir-rice-case

I just respected lefties more when they agreed that police should not shoot unarmed people. What happened?

what happened is that your "unarmed" assailant at DC broke throw a barricaded door window with a bunch of wailing, armed yahoos behind her....she did this AFTER REPEATEDLY BEING
warned by armed security not to do so. BIG DIFFERENCE from the kid's death you tried to compare to.

Notice dear readers, that when B&T is faced with facts and logic that totally destroy his first assertion/declaration, he immediately ignores what's presented and just parrots the SOS, NEVER admitting he was wrong. That the objective reader can see the folly of B&T's willful ignorance and insipid stubbornness in a printed medium is lost on him. Pathetic

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Pay attention genius:

A rampaging mob screaming about lynching and such, some armed, have already beaten down security guards, vandalized property and are intent on "getting to" the members of the Senate, who are behind barricaded doors. The security behind those doors WARN people trying to break in that they are armed and to leave...DO NOT ENTER. Babbit decides she's going to live out her Turner Diaries fantasy, breaches the door and starts climbing in, with the mob behind her.

Security doesn't know if she's packing weapons, carrying a bomb, whatever.

No law enforcement/security officer of any stripe in the world would recommend, "well, let her in and try to arrest her while shooting anyone who trys to follow".

Doesn't work that way in the real world, genius.

You're talking some BS as if that mob were the usual routine demonstrators that show up periodically at the capital. You and I both know that wasn't the case, so the usual arrest/ticketing procedure wasn't even possible.

You're parroting this surrealistic drivel of yours is a pathetic excuse for the true MAGA mentality demonstrated and urged on during the Trump administration.

Thank you I am rather intelligent, and the disparity bewtween myself and others here is so stark its contrast is hard to ignore!



So you are arguing cops had no way of knowing if ashli was armed so it was a good shoot.


You are also arguing cops were told a kid was menacing with a gun, they see the gun, had no way of knowing if it was real or not, so it was a bad shoot.



How is that cognitive dissonance sitting?

1. Lame attempt by you to deflect sarcasm. Pity the sheer BS and stupidity of your previous assertions makes your attempt all the more pathetic.

2. Please take a refresher course in reading comprehension. In the meantime, here's the same sentence with some helpers for you; Babbit decides she's going to live out her Turner Diaries fantasy, breaches the door and starts climbing in, with the mob behind her.

Security doesn't know if she's packing weapons, carrying a bomb, whatever.

3. From the PBS link you didn't read, "...The two officers who were investigated told authorities soon after the shooting that Rice was reaching for his toy weapon prior to being shot and was given multiple commands to show his hands.

But the video reviewed by federal prosecutors makes the sequence of events less clear. The grainy time-lapse video, which has no audio, “does not show detail or perspective” and the camera’s view is obstructed by a police patrol car, prosecutors said. In addition, they said, though the positioning of the boy’s arms suggests they were in the vicinity of his waist, “his hands are not visible in the video and it cannot be determined from the video what he was doing.”


Since the child was NOT charging said officers, was NOT backed by a raging semi-armed mob that had already assaulted security officers and killed at least one, your comparsion is absurd.

4. Please don't use words and phrases that you aren't capable of understanding how to apply them. The chronology of the posts shows my systematic deconstruction of your declarations using facts and logic. No supposition and conjecture blather like you.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

lol what?


https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/n...-brooklyn.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54137838
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_s...olice_officers
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats...lled-in-ambush
https://fox11online.com/on-fox-11/ga...dallas-reports
https://www.jacksonville.com/article...NEWS/801240580



you want to re-tally that?

1. Shot while sitting in a police car in 2014, not during a protest.
2. Both officers are alive and well and didn't happen during a protest.
3. Not killed by a rioter or protestor but a lone gunman who fired from a high position with the intent to kill white people. No known association with BLM or Antifa. Repeating this claim again doesn't make it a murder by BLM or Antifa.
4. Officers killed when sitting in a coffee shop. Not during a protest.
5. This is a duplication of 3.
6. Officer killed investigating a report of shots fired in a neighborhood. Not during a protest.

[Into the Night]

Like every other time you've been asked, you can't prove what you claim.

RQAA. Like everything else, you simply deny what is there, troll.

[Into the Night]

My comments have showcased your refusal to provide corroboration to back up your claims.

I don't want you to go away.

I derive great pleasure from being able to repeatedly highlight your hypocrisy.

Hallucination. Calling people hypocrites changes nothing. Insult fallacy.

[Into the Night]

what happened is that your "unarmed" assailant at DC broke throw a barricaded door window with a bunch of wailing, armed yahoos behind her....she did this AFTER REPEATEDLY BEING
warned by armed security not to do so. BIG DIFFERENCE from the kid's death you tried to compare to.

Notice dear readers, that when B&T is faced with facts and logic that totally destroy his first assertion/declaration, he immediately ignores what's presented and just parrots the SOS, NEVER admitting he was wrong. That the objective reader can see the folly of B&T's willful ignorance and insipid stubbornness in a printed medium is lost on him. Pathetic

No. She was trying to stop Antifa from breaking down the door.

[zappasguitar]

RQAA. Like everything else, you simply deny what is there, troll.

Once again, the same parroted non answer.

ITN refuses to corroborate his claims.

[Taichiliberal]

Once again, the same parroted non answer.

ITN refuses to corroborate his claims.

One of the reasons I have him on IA....he's a pretty poor excuse for a right wingnut troll.

[Into the Night]

Once again, the same parroted non answer.

ITN refuses to corroborate his claims.

RQAA

[Into the Night]

One of the reasons I have him on IA....he's a pretty poor excuse for a right wingnut troll.

Inversion fallacy. Thank you for removing yourself from the conversation.