IF BIDEN BECOMES POTUS CRT WILL POISON YOUR KIDS SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES

[Dachsund]

There was an official Democrat Party document released recently - ( I'm sorry I cannot cite it at the moment, as, I 've lost the link, but I will find again anon and then add it to this post) - which show that a Puppet POTUS Biden would be handed a pile of Executive Orders (EOs) to sign. Included in this this will be an (EO) RESCINDING President Trump's Executive Order of 23 September this year which expanded a ban on government agencies receiving so-called "Sensitivity Training" and "Diversity Training", at a cost of millions of dollars to the American taxpayer.




The 'intellectual" ( and it makes me physically cringe to use that word ) foundation of these "Sensitivity" and "Diversity" training courses was Critical Race Theory (CRT); CRT is also the inspiration for the ongoing "1619 Project" developed by "The New York Times Magazine" last year, which I will discuss in a little more detail below.




"Critical Race Theory" was initially developed in the 1970's by an African - American scholar named Derrick Bell at Harvard Law School. Bell was a neo-Marxist (a Critical Theorist who had turned his attention to race). Bell was a typical hate-fueled, resentful, race-baiting, Black, "intellectual" shit-stirrer throughout much of his academic career. You know, one of the kind that sees racist White (European) Americans oppressing and unfairly discriminating against Black African - Americans everywhere, ( "Oh, yes, Brother ! And hear me now - hear me when I say - its all due to this evil American society which is rotten to the core with White man's "institutionalized/system racism !"). That is probably why Derrick Bell was, and still is, Barack Obama's favorite professor of all during his days as a student. Probably the the most important name behind modern Critical Race Theory is Kimberle Crenshaw who worked on CRT at Columbia University in the late 1980. Crenshaw, a Black African - American, like Bell, was similarly educated and later employed at such elite, prestigious American Universities as: Harvard; Harvard Law School; Stanford; UCLA School of Law; Columbia and so on.




It really does make me wonder how prestigious Universities like these allow PURE, TOXIC, PSEUDO-ACADAMIC, TRASH like Critical Race Theory to be developed and taught on their campuses ?? Add to this the fact that YOU are funding a lot of it through your the tax you are forced to pay (or go straight to prison) and the mind
really boggles.




There are so many MAJOR problems with CRT - so much STUPIDITY - that it's impossible to set even a fraction of it all down in one post. So, I thought I'd pick out what I think most sane people would agree are a couple of very stupid core claim that CRT makes, and provide two quick examples of the kind of thinking the morons involved in creating and pedaling this crap were/ (still are) engaged in. They are summaries of two of the core tenets of CRT taken from the standard introductory text on the subject titled "Critical Race Theory: An Introduction", by Richard Delgardo and Jean Stefanic....





(1) (This is a real beauty)...A core theme of CRT is the "social construction" thesis. This holds that race and races are [B] purely products of social thought and social relations. "Not objective, inherent, or fixed, they correspond to no biological or genetic reality; rather, races are categories that society invents, manipulates or retires when convenient."




This means if I were to collect a standard sample of, say, 100, "common or garden variety," pygmies from the West Congo in Africa and place them in a town hall next to 100 White (European) Americans for you to carefully inspect, the many differences you would note between the two groups would have come about NOT as a result of ANYTHING to do with genetic factors or biological factors; rather, all of the differences you observed between the average pygmies and the average White (European) American were actually ALL SOCIALLY CREATED - ALL DUE TO SOCIAL THOUGHT and SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS Funny, but every mainstream biologist in the Western World says that is a pile of BIG HAIRY DOG's BOLLOCKS. So lets move on to the second example of batshit - crazy CRT nonsense....





(2) "The Enlightenment" (or "The Age of Reason") was an intellectual movement in Western Europe which lasted about 150 years, what is called the "Scientific Revolution" was an important aspect of it, Isaac Newton, for example, who is generally acknowledged as the greatest ever scientist was an Enlightenment figure. The Enlightenment began in 1620 with Francis Bacon, an English Statesman who developed the[I]scientific method) in Novum Organum and ended in 1781 with the German philosopher Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason "The Enlightenment" (and its closely associated scientific revolution) is the foundation of modern Western political, intellectual culture and remarkable scientific/technological progress
.



Probably the most basic principles of the Enlightenment/Scientific revolution were: a belief in the objective, (metaphysical), independent, existence of TRUTH; and the advocacy of reason ( i.e; the use of rational, logical, analytical modes of thought, such as deductive reasoning or, for instance the inductive reasoning of "the Scientific Method") as a means for man to discover the truth about reality. Enlightenment reasoning also impelled changes in the political theory and ideas of government. The English Enlightenment philosopher , John Locke, (1632 - 1704) had a profound influence on the thinking of the American Founders, like Thomas Jefferson. Locke argued that governments' must respect a citizen's right to individual Liberty, life and possession of private property, he also put forward the justification for the Doctrine of the Separations of Powers and "Checks and Balances" that the Founders would adopt. Other American rights that were fruits of the Enlightenment included Freedom of" Conscience", that is, the guaranteed right of a US citizen to "Freedom of Speech" and "Religious Freedom" (tragically, "Freedom of Speech" no longer exists in modern-day America - it was destroyed by the neo - Marxist Left ); the economic system of free-market capitalism set down by the Scottish Enlightenment economist, Adam Smith, in 1776; the US system of Republican representative (liberal) democracy was also a legacy of the Western "Enlightenment".




Overall, Western science and its industrial/ technological achievements have been a boon for mankind that continues, as we speak, to lift millions of human beings out of famine, want and misery. They continue to steadily increase the welfare, quality of life and lifespan of people all around the globe. As has the adoption of free-market capitalism and representative democracy in foreign countries that were formerly failed states governed by tyrannical oligarchs and autocrats. Likewise, the Enlightenment inheritance of universal legal charters that enshrine a fundamental, absolute, non-fungible entitlement to natural human rights for all men and women.




[B]CRITICAL RACE THEORY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN OBJECTIVE, INDEPENDENT TRUTH; IT BELIEVES THAT SCIENCE, REASON (ENLIGHTENMENT RATIONALITY, LOGIC AND EVIDENCE ARE AN OPPRESSIVE, WHITE "WAY OF KNOWING"




Depending on the circumstances, Critical Race Theory, resides somewhere between "generally not interested in science" and openly hostile to it. This is because CRT, using the "social construction" thesis, believes the POWER of and POLITICS of cultural groups make their way intrinsically into EVERYTHING that culture produces, Thus, science is just politics by other means to Critical Race Theory.




Because modern science was predominantly produced by White, Western European men during the "Enlightenment", CRT therefore views science as a White and Western "way of knowing". CRT therefore maintains that Western science encodes and perpetuates "White dominance" and thus really isn't fitting for Black Americans who inhabit a political culture of Blackness.




This is obviously a despicable and disgusting sentiment, and it is one that goes against the very first pillars of science: universality. Universality in science says it doesn't matter who does an experiment; the result will always be the same. This is because science believes in OBJECTIVITY, which CRT calls an oppressive myth. Listen to this crazy bullshit from two best - selling CRT authors ( Robin DiAngelo and Ozlem Sensoy)...





" One of the key contributions of Critical Theorists concerns the production of knowledge. Given that the transmission of knowledge is an integral activity in schools, critical scholars in the field of education have been especially concerned with how knowledge is produced. These scholars argue that a key element of social injustice involves the claim that particular knowledge is objective, neutral and universal. An approach based on CRT calls into question the idea that objectivity is desirable or even possible. The term used to describe this way of thinking about knowledge is that knowledge is "socially constructed". When we refer to knowledge as "socially constructed" we mean that knowledge is reflective of the values and interests of those who produce it.





Critical Race Theory falsely asserts that White (European) peoples interests are primarily served by science. This is not merely wrong (and genuinely racist), it is dangerous.




Critical Race Theory continues the genuinely racist thinking that Black people aren't suited to, or served by, science, by saying that STORYTELLING their "lived experience" is the primary mode by which Black people and CRT produce and advance knowledge. Importantly, these "lived experiences" are only considered valid if they agree with Critical Race Theory !




While stories can be informative, to create a position that science is a "way of knowing" foe White Western people (especially men) and storytelling is one more suited to racial minorities like Black African Americans, Critical Race Theory is itself RACIST (against racial minorities) and cripples the people it claims to help. This happens in multiple ways, including by undermining their capacity for critical thinking, teaching them to see the world in an us - versus - them way that oppresses them, ans associating them with harmful, negative stereotypes that rigorous methods are what White people, and nor Black people use.





If (GOD FORBID ! GOD FORBID !) the lying, corrupt, treasonous, cheating, political puppet known as Dementia Joe Biden becomes POTUS on January 21, 2021, he will be quickly directed to sign Executive Orders (or else !) One of them will unleash Critical Race Theory in euphemistically - named programs like "Sensitivity Training"," Diversity Training"," White Privilege Training" and so on into public and private sector workplaces across America. These employees will be taught that White Americans are innately and permanenlyt racist pieces of shit who should beg for forgiveness, and sincerely apologize for being permitted to exist and breathe the same air as the morally righteous American Blacks they have so cruelly oppressed since early in the 17th century. Biden's puppet-masters will also inject the poison of CRT into the K-12 curriculum through garbage revisionist historiography, like the "1619 Project", which is a false pile of lies that teaches White American students that their country is racist through and through, and that they are wicked, tainted, worthless human beings who must apologize for being White and "bend the knee to the kind of scum that make up organizations like 'Black Live Matter"..... and that's just the start !




Dachshund

[BattleofHodow]

America is pretty much doomed, anyways.

Might as well at least support environmental protections.

[BattleofHodow]

Trump had 4 years to deport undocumented immigrants.

[Charoite]

Shitposting out conspiracies are not current event forum material.

[archives]

The telling sign there is this is an “official Democrat Party document” but “I can not cite the link,” but it is “official,” okie dokie

[AProudLefty]

Both policies reflect an understanding of race as a socially constructed category different from ethnicity, genetic ancestry, or biology, and aim to end the misinterpretation of race as a biological category defined by genetic traits or biological differences. As the policies note, this practice of accepting race as a biological construct—known as racial essentialism—exacerbates health disparities and results in detrimental health outcomes for marginalized and minoritized communities.

Additionally, the policies call on AMA to take swift action, including:

Encouraging characterizing race as a social construct, rather than an inherent biological trait.
Supporting ending the practice of using race as a proxy for biology in medical education, research and clinical practice.
Encouraging medical education programs to recognize the harmful effects of presenting race as biology in medical education through curriculum changes that explain how racism results in health disparities by:
Demonstrating how the category “race” can influence health outcomes
Presenting race within a socio-ecological model of individual, community and society to explain how racism and systemic oppression result in racial health disparities
Recommending that clinicians and researchers focus on genetics and biology, the experience of racism, and social determinants of health when describing risk factors for disease.

https://www.ama-assn.org/press-cente...ical-construct

[BattleofHodow]

Both policies reflect an understanding of race as a socially constructed category different from ethnicity, genetic ancestry, or biology, and aim to end the misinterpretation of race as a biological category defined by genetic traits or biological differences. As the policies note, this practice of accepting race as a biological construct—known as racial essentialism—exacerbates health disparities and results in detrimental health outcomes for marginalized and minoritized communities.

Additionally, the policies call on AMA to take swift action, including:

Encouraging characterizing race as a social construct, rather than an inherent biological trait.
Supporting ending the practice of using race as a proxy for biology in medical education, research and clinical practice.
Encouraging medical education programs to recognize the harmful effects of presenting race as biology in medical education through curriculum changes that explain how racism results in health disparities by:
Demonstrating how the category “race” can influence health outcomes
Presenting race within a socio-ecological model of individual, community and society to explain how racism and systemic oppression result in racial health disparities
Recommending that clinicians and researchers focus on genetics and biology, the experience of racism, and social determinants of health when describing risk factors for disease.

https://www.ama-assn.org/press-cente...ical-construct

I LOL'd at racism results in health disparities.

Like sickle cell is from racism?

Latinos & Asians don't have nearly as much heart disease & diabetes as Blacks, despite also being minorities subjected to discrimination here.

[domer76]

You’re not just stupid, you’re a fucking idiot.

[BattleofHodow]

You’re not just stupid, you’re a fucking idiot.

Believing in biological equality is faulty logic, or rather lack of logic.

[Charoite]

Believing in biological equality is faulty logic, or rather lack of logic.

I think he's posting about the OP dingus.

[BattleofHodow]

I think he's posting about the OP dingus.

Wouldn't matter much, anyways.

Because my premises are similar to the OP.

[StoneByStone]

Trump had 4 years to deport undocumented immigrants.

And he ended up deporting less than Obama did.

[BattleofHodow]

And he ended up deporting less than Obama did.

True.

[BattleofHodow]

The scientific revolution is widely contributed to Copernicus of Poland.

[Micawber]

I figured I'd strengthen your case, dickhound