Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 99

Thread: "Barr taps Durham as special counsel, pushing probe into Biden era"

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default "Barr taps Durham as special counsel, pushing probe into Biden era"

    "Attorney General William Barr has appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as a special counsel to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election."

    "The appointment formalizes Durham’s ongoing probe, but more significantly, would give Durham latitude to continue the politically explosive investigation after President-elect Joe Biden takes office in January."

    "The extension of Durham's probe into the Biden administration raises the specter that it could stretch even longer than Mueller's 22-month probe of Russian interference and the Trump campaign. Democrats noted the duration of Durham's efforts and blasted Barr for his decision."

    “In an appointment secretly conferred on Durham prior to the election and only disclosed now that Barr concedes there is no evidence of election fraud to overturn the results, Barr is using the special counsel law for a purpose it was not intended: to continue a politically motivated investigation long after Barr leaves office"

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...-russia-441872

    Must be Billy Barr felt he could at least appease Trump after declaring even he couldn't find any fraud in the 2020 election and had to publicly admit the truth

    Interesting how the champion for the imperial presidency, who was appointed as Trump's fixer for largely authoring a lengthy narrative on his disapproval of Mueller investigating a sitting President, appoints a Special Prosecutor during a lame duck period on his way out the door.

    Matters little, obvious Durham ain't found anything in the seven months he has been at it, and although it is questionable if Biden could fire Durham, the new AG can control the scope and size of Druham's investigation, just like Rosenstein and Barr did with Mueller, ain't going to be any probe into "the truth ain't the truth" Rudi's Biden innuendos

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-01-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Christ it's been so long I can't even recall the scope of Durham's charter.
    This is either the mother of all RICO or a giant waste of trying to make abuse of power into a criminal charges

    one of these days Durham will croak up results.
    I don't know how you were diverted / You were perverted too
    I don't know how you were inverted / No one alerted you

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Which will be summarily stopped Jan 21

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-01-2020)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Attorney General William Barr has appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as a special counsel
    to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election."
    Gives him greater power in DoJ for one thing - not sure if it improves his investigatory power

    Barr is using the special counsel law for a purpose it was not intended: to continue a politically motivated investigation long after Barr leaves office"
    lie. The Horowitz IG reported Abuse of Power -many of them.
    Continuation to a Special Counsel is in the same realm as the Russian Hoax investigation
    it is not "politically motivated"

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,778
    Thanks
    102,706
    Thanked 55,170 Times in 33,867 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "Attorney General William Barr has appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as a special counsel to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election."

    "The appointment formalizes Durham’s ongoing probe, but more significantly, would give Durham latitude to continue the politically explosive investigation after President-elect Joe Biden takes office in January."

    "The extension of Durham's probe into the Biden administration raises the specter that it could stretch even longer than Mueller's 22-month probe of Russian interference and the Trump campaign. Democrats noted the duration of Durham's efforts and blasted Barr for his decision."

    “In an appointment secretly conferred on Durham prior to the election and only disclosed now that Barr concedes there is no evidence of election fraud to overturn the results, Barr is using the special counsel law for a purpose it was not intended: to continue a politically motivated investigation long after Barr leaves office"

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...-russia-441872

    Must be Billy Barr felt he could at least appease Trump after declaring even he couldn't find any fraud in the 2020 election and had to publicly admit the truth

    Interesting how the champion for the imperial presidency, who was appointed as Trump's fixer for largely authoring a lengthy narrative on his disapproval of Mueller investigating a sitting President, appoints a Special Prosecutor during a lame duck period on his way out the door.

    Matters little, obvious Durham ain't found anything in the seven months he has been at it, and although it is questionable if Biden could fire Durham, the new AG can control the scope and size of Druham's investigation, just like Rosenstein and Barr did with Mueller, ain't going to be any probe into "the truth ain't the truth" Rudi's Biden innuendos
    Yeah, it was a CYA for Barr and nothing more.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Jarod (12-02-2020)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Which will be summarily stopped Jan 21
    cant shut down a Special Counsel without being accused of political motivations to do so
    See why they are loathsome constructs? they run wild

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,948
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 5,068 Times in 3,418 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 643 Times in 611 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    cant shut down a Special Counsel without being accused of political motivations to do so
    See why they are loathsome constructs? they run wild
    Special Counsels report to the AG. In a normal administration the AG is not politically tied to the President's whims. The special counsel will have to justify their existence with the AG. If there is no legal reason for them to exist then the AG can just cut funding to them without firing them.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Which will be summarily stopped Jan 21
    The whole point with the change to SC was to keep Biden from shutting Durham down.

    I love it. Biden will be in the exact same position as Trump was with respect to Mullet: Biden risks an obstruction charge if he tries any malarkey with Durham.

    Wouldn’t it be a hoot if Durham charges Biden with obstruction.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    Special Counsels report to the AG. In a normal administration the AG is not politically tied to the President's whims. The special counsel will have to justify their existence with the AG. If there is no legal reason for them to exist then the AG can just cut funding to them without firing them.
    of course a new AG has 'authority', but a new AG of a new party coming in and shutting down a special counsel
    would draw charges of corruption and cover up
    I don't know how you were diverted / You were perverted too
    I don't know how you were inverted / No one alerted you

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "Attorney General William Barr has appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as a special counsel to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election."

    "The appointment formalizes Durham’s ongoing probe, but more significantly, would give Durham latitude to continue the politically explosive investigation after President-elect Joe Biden takes office in January."

    "The extension of Durham's probe into the Biden administration raises the specter that it could stretch even longer than Mueller's 22-month probe of Russian interference and the Trump campaign. Democrats noted the duration of Durham's efforts and blasted Barr for his decision."

    “In an appointment secretly conferred on Durham prior to the election and only disclosed now that Barr concedes there is no evidence of election fraud to overturn the results, Barr is using the special counsel law for a purpose it was not intended: to continue a politically motivated investigation long after Barr leaves office"

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...-russia-441872

    Must be Billy Barr felt he could at least appease Trump after declaring even he couldn't find any fraud in the 2020 election and had to publicly admit the truth

    Interesting how the champion for the imperial presidency, who was appointed as Trump's fixer for largely authoring a lengthy narrative on his disapproval of Mueller investigating a sitting President, appoints a Special Prosecutor during a lame duck period on his way out the door.

    Matters little, obvious Durham ain't found anything in the seven months he has been at it, and although it is questionable if Biden could fire Durham, the new AG can control the scope and size of Druham's investigation, just like Rosenstein and Barr did with Mueller, ain't going to be any probe into "the truth ain't the truth" Rudi's Biden innuendos
    Mullet had a scope lol?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    dukkha (12-01-2020)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Gives him greater power in DoJ for one thing - not sure if it improves his investigatory power

    lie. The Horowitz IG reported Abuse of Power -many of them.
    Continuation to a Special Counsel is in the same realm as the Russian Hoax investigation
    it is not "politically motivated"
    His "investigating power" will be closely regulated by the new Attorney General.

    And this and Mueller's investigation are more dissimilar than anything else. Bottom line, Obama did not appoint Mueller, he was appointed by a Trump nominated Assistant Attorney General in a Trump Judicial Department. Neither Obama nor his AG at the end of his Presidency, Loretta Lynch, didn't leave initiate a special investigation as they were leaving the White House, which is exactly what Barr is doing here, how can it be anything but politically motivated?

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-01-2020)

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Mullet had a scope lol?
    he gave Trump a proctology exam and came up with nothing but (possible) obstructions.

    I heard our old friend Weissmann- something about he wants investigations to go on for Trump
    See if I can find it

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Darth Omar (12-01-2020)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,473
    Thanks
    12,206
    Thanked 14,323 Times in 10,512 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,917 Times in 4,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    he gave Trump a proctology exam and came up with nothing but (possible) obstructions.

    I heard our old friend Weissmann- something about he wants investigations to go on for Trump
    See if I can find it

    FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

    A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
    B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
    C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
    D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
    E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
    F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
    H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
    I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
    J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
    K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Mullet had a scope lol?
    Strict scope which both Rosenstein and Barr tightly controlled, there was a reason he couldn't go beyond investigating straight forward criminal charges regardless of the evidence he found

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-01-2020)

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    His "investigating power" will be closely regulated by the new Attorney General.

    And this and Mueller's investigation are more dissimilar than anything else. Bottom line, Obama did not appoint Mueller, he was appointed by a Trump nominated Assistant Attorney General in a Trump Judicial Department. Neither Obama nor his AG at the end of his Presidency, Loretta Lynch, didn't leave initiate a special investigation as they were leaving the White House, which is exactly what Barr is doing here, how can it be anything but politically motivated?
    what? I cant follow that. sorry
    Durham was appointed to look at what the IG found ( 'irregularities' to use the current buzz word)
    in terms of criminal violations.
    He was especially to look at the predicate for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation that was turned into
    the Russian Hoax by Comey and company desperate to use Steele to take out Trump

Similar Threads

  1. "Trump: Discussing a Biden probe with Barr would be 'appropriate"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2019, 02:51 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-28-2019, 07:08 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-24-2018, 05:04 PM
  4. "GOP leaders back second special counsel"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2018, 04:28 PM
  5. "Special counsel obtains thousands of Trump transition emails"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-17-2017, 08:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •