Excerpt from Federalist Papers No. 78, likely written by Alexander Hamilton:
“Though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive. For I agree, that ‘there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.’ And it proves, in the last place, that as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have everything to fear from its union with either of the other departments.”
We Americans can no longer claim to be a shining example of free, fair and open elections
The line of dominos that represent America’s foundational institutions related to law and order have fallen, except one.
It alone stands to be tested. The integrity of the Supreme Court.
The SCOTUS became the Democrat Party’s lap dog a long time ago. Proofs: Ruling against the Constitution’s original intent at every chance, never hearing a case that might challenge the New World Order’s global agenda, rolling over for television like it was print press, becoming the linchpin that created today’s Parasite Class.
The most tragic proof of all was when activist justices in 1973 decriminalized the slaughter of 60 million infants and still counting.
Sad to say, infanticide was not the last domino. The last domino falls should Supreme Court justices give Biden their blessings.
QUESTION: Did the Supreme Court ever rule in favor of limited government? ANSWER: I know of none. If you know of one such ruling please tell me which one.
Incidentally, Biden will pack the court for the same reason FDR tried it —— only Biden & Company will eliminate every possibility for the court to strike down oppressive big government legislation:
After winning the 1936 presidential election in a landslide, Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a bill to expand the membership of the Supreme Court. The law would have added one justice to the Court for each justice over the age of 70, with a maximum of six additional justices. Roosevelt’s motive was clear – to shape the ideological balance of the Court so that it would cease striking down his New Deal legislation. As a result, the plan was widely and vehemently criticized. The law was never enacted by Congress, and Roosevelt lost a great deal of political support for having proposed it. Shortly after the president made the plan public, however, the Court upheld several government regulations of the type it had formerly found unconstitutional. In National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, for example, the Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate labor-management relations pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts, often referred to as “the switch in time that saved nine.” Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts' 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt's proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence.
p.s. You might say the court is more obedient today than it was in 1937, the year it became a purebred lap dog:
purebred (adjective)
Of or belonging to a recognized strain established by breeding individuals of unmixed lineage over many generations.
lap dog (noun)
1. A small dog kept as a pet.
2. Informal. One that is eager to do another's bidding, especially so as to maintain a position of privilege or favor: “a bunch of intellectual lap dogs for anybody who holds a big job in government” (Mike Barnicle).
Reply With Quote
Verified User
Purebred Lap Dog
Originally Posted by archives
Posting Rules
Bookmarks