Diesel (11-28-2020)
Ah, found it. Watch these guys do this. Now imagine you have someone who is better than them at slight of hand at a voting station...
These are not some quacks or whatever, they are computer professionals. It only takes one or a few such people willing to do this maliciously and giving their hack to others to make it happen over a wide area. It doesn't require any large number of people, and each "cell" hacking can operate completely independent of any other.
Stretch (11-28-2020)
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
See, this is the typical Democrat response. It's clear it could happen. Those systems are in place and what I outlined is obviously feasible and doable by a very small number of people to affect a very large number of votes. There are obvious solutions to these problems:
Eliminate and make illegal ballot harvesting
Eliminate early voting to the maximum extent possible
Institute voter ID requirements that are reasonably secure.
Mandate in-person voting to the maximum extent possible
Require the use of a paper ballot and paper trail.
Institute rigid chains of custody that prevent slipping in fraudulent ballots.
Those are some basics. Of course, the Democrats in particular, are against ALL OF THAT! Why is that? Why are the Democrats so dead set against making elections MORE secure?
Bookmarks