Biden: master of the implausible

[BartenderElite]

With of the lack of protection from mail in voting fraud it isn't even a little surprising. I'n fact Trump predicted it.

Trump was calling "massive fraud" in 2016, also - without this level of mail-in. And he was "predicting" it before the election, and still claiming it afterward, because he lost the popular.

It's a defense mechanism for him: "in case" he loses, and then - of course - if he actually does lose.

[BartenderElite]

Not bad for a man who is universally hated.

You're talking about primary voting, right?

[Flash]

He beat The Obama’s primary numbers. Did Obama have a primary opponent in 2012?

Only 6.5 million voted in the 2012 Democratic primary v. 18.1 million in the 2020 Republican primary.

Another thing I added to my post was that the Federalist article stated "Barnes added that in those “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.” This is not true and easily disproven.

[Darth Omar]

With of the lack of protection from mail in voting fraud it isn't even a little surprising. I'n fact Trump predicted it.

Legion predicted Trump would lose on account of it.

He was pretty adamant about it.

[jakemax]

The truth hurts, doesn’t it, punk?

I've yet to see one of you traitor bastards tell the truth.

[ExpressLane]

How about a single piece of evidence to start with? You know...instead of over 30 cases that have been laughed out of court?

How about we start there?

Oh there is a lot of statistical data. But you ignore the science.

[Darth Omar]

You're talking about primary voting, right?

Matters lol?

It’s nearly 100% approval.

[SuperStringTheory]

#3 is just factually wrong.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...te-cities/amp/

[BartenderElite]

Oh there is a lot of statistical data. But you ignore the science.

There is actually zilch.

I get it - it's hard to lose national elections. But people move on.

[BartenderElite]

Matters lol?

It’s nearly 100% approval.

In a primary...right?

[AProudLefty]

Legion predicted Trump would lose on account of it.

He was pretty adamant about it.

He didn't predict shit.

[ExpressLane]

Legion predicted Trump would lose on account of it.

He was pretty adamant about it.

My brother and I both said that Trump would win on Election night but after the Dems found how many votes they needed they would "find" enough to win in the week following the election. We were correct.

[Darth Omar]

Only 6.5 million voted in the 2012 Democratic primary v. 18.1 million in the 2020 Republican primary.

Another thing I added to my post was that the Federalist article stated "Barnes added that in those “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.” This is not true and easily disproven.

Raw numbers don’t matter since it’s a percentage of the vote.

I don’t know about the second point.

[Nordberg]

I wish I really knew lol.

No, you don't. That article was Federalist right wing crap. Those were silly. Any election with a country of 330 million people are going to have things you could point tom but those were bad.

[Darth Omar]

My brother and I both said that Trump would win on Election night but after the Dems found how many votes they needed they would "find" enough to win in the week following the election. We were correct.

Probably what they did [sure as hell looked like it] but they’re probably going to get away with it.