Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Article 21, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,714
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    It says a lot when you marginalize article 21 like this. In your mind, you have already processed how to circumvent, deny,, and suppress article 21. This is a picture worth a thousand words,, and it shows that you believe deep down that Beijing Biden didn't actually win in a free and fair election.
    You are just trying to use an idealistic declaration to make a point we already agree with--that elections should be fair and honest. Until someone presents evidence the 2020 election it means nothing. I thought the conservatives didn't like the U.N.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,856
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You are just trying to use an idealistic declaration to make a point we already agree with--that elections should be fair and honest. Until someone presents evidence the 2020 election it means nothing. I thought the conservatives didn't like the U.N.
    Was thinking same thing, don’t know that I’ve heard someone supposedly on the right break out U.N. articles like this.

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You are just trying to use an idealistic declaration to make a point we already agree with--that elections should be fair and honest. Until someone presents evidence the 2020 election it means nothing. I thought the conservatives didn't like the U.N.
    If this is a point that you agree with, then why are you processing how to undermine, circumvent, suppress, or otherwise marginalize it? Why are you in conflict with it?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Was thinking same thing, don’t know that I’ve heard someone supposedly on the right break out U.N. articles like this.
    It is interesting how lefties look to marginalize this article 21. Are you in conflict with article 21? Why are lefties being evasive about article 21?
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,856
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    It is interesting how lefties look to marginalize this article 21. Are you in conflict with article 21? Why are lefties being evasive about article 21?
    I don’t give two sh*ts about the U.N. and their articles. It’s the same response I give when liberals try to use the U.N. articles to make policy in America. You plan on supporting them when they do that in the future?

  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    What is Evmetro trying to do? There's nothing to dispute in the OP.

  7. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,714
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    If this is a point that you agree with, then why are you processing how to undermine, circumvent, suppress, or otherwise marginalize it? Why are you in conflict with it?
    No conflict. I am all for fair and honest elections.

    Even if a country finds fraud in its election there is nothing a U.N. declaration can do--it is irrelevant.

    There were international observers for the 2020 election who found nothing irregular.

  8. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,714
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    It is interesting how lefties look to marginalize this article 21. Are you in conflict with article 21? Why are lefties being evasive about article 21?
    You are confusing evasive with a complete lack of interest due to its irrelevancy.

Similar Threads

  1. HAPPY HUMAN RIGHTS DAY.
    By moon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-14-2018, 03:16 PM
  2. Human Rights
    By Reverend Bones in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 02:55 PM
  3. Individual Rights: Natural, Equal, Universal
    By midcan5 in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-22-2010, 08:12 PM
  4. ND measure says fertilized egg has human rights
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 01:51 PM
  5. Human Rights
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-30-2007, 09:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •