Members banned from this thread: Blackwater Lunchbreak, Truth Detector, CFM, Grokmaster and Yakuda |
Pretty elementary really. Then you get the double digit IQ'ers like Bullwinkle the moose brain, who seem to struggle with basic concepts.
If they spent half of the time studying that they do stroking tRump's shriveled "mushroom", they simply wouldnt be so damned ignorant.
Please leave your Trump 2024 signs in your yard. That way, my dog will know where to take a dump.
The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.
Judge Sullivan asked the FBI lawyer why they did not charge treason. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his job as a foreign county's lobbyist while he was taking an NSA job. Rightys may be unable to figure out why that is wrong. It seems pretty obvious to the rest of the world.
You are right. There is just common sense, and that does not include you.
How could that be since you have posted nothing to prove his analysis to be in error?Argumentum ad hominem. Fail.
The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
"Once pardoned, however, there is no legal jeopardy for past federal crimes. Therefore, the Fifth Amendment can no longer be a shield and permit Trump’s pardoned associates from refusing to answer questions under penalty of perjury. This creates a paradox for President Trump. When he pardons an individual, they are free from possible prosecution but they are also uncloaked of their most robust constitutional protection.
This may well be why President Trump has not pardoned Flynn, for example. Given the reported substantial contacts between Flynn and Russian government emissaries, given Flynn’s patent falsities including on federal forms completed under penalty of perjury, Flynn’s only protection presently from being compelled to testify – including possibly against the President and others – is the Fifth Amendment self-incrimination clause. Imagine if that was no longer a shield. Grand Jury, FBI Agents, Congress all could drill Flynn under oath. Any material prevarication would be punishable as perjury. At that point Flynn’s personal interest will be to tell the truth, even if that truth incriminates the President who fired him."
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Flynn is guilty because he said so in court twice. That is a starter you can not escape. Who says he is guilty? Flynn says so.
christiefan915 (11-27-2020)
Bookmarks