Page 12 of 17 FirstFirst ... 28910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 244

Thread: Biden names climate statesman John Kerry as climate envoy

  1. #166 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,840
    Thanks
    13,241
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,660
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    He seems to think.that you can pick and choose where your electricity comes from,
    well he's rich.....maybe he gets his flown in.....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. #167 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    Um. What? Stop posting at me. You are dumber than a fucking hamster.
    Insult fallacy. You don't get to designate who I post to, or respond to. You are not the king.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  3. #168 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    Climate science, you fucking moron.
    Define 'climate science'. Please state the theories of science you are using.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  4. #169 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    Does this mean he will be flying around the country in a Cessna 150 and Moving out of his huge house and into a two bedroom one bath away from the seaside with a smaller carbon footprint.. Don't want the oceans rising and flooding his home.
    Good solid airplane, the Cessna 150. Not fast, but it'll get you there given time.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  5. #170 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    Climate change includes both the global warming
    You are defining 'climate change' with another buzzword. Define 'global warming'.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases
    No gas or vapor is capable warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. See the 1st law of thermodynamics.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns.
    Define 'weather pattern'. Buzzword fallacy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    Though there have been previous periods of climatic change,
    Define 'climate change' Buzzword fallacy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    since the mid-20th century the rate of human impact on Earth's climate system
    Define 'climate system'. Buzzword fallacy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    and the global scale of that impact have been unprecedented.
    What impact? Please describe this 'impact'. Define 'global warming'. Define 'climate change'. Define 'climate system'. You are just spewing buzzwords. They are meaningless. Define them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    You're probably going to be the first person I block.
    Argument of the stick fallacy. Go ahead. I'll just talk behind your back. All you do by putting me on an ignore list is remove yourself from the conversation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
    You're officially dumber than the dumbest people here.
    You're also a liar; and I don't wrestle with pigs.
    Insult fallacies. Science is not people, or dumb. It is not a lie. You just deny it. See the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  6. #171 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    Your power should be cut off, fucktard.

    Enjoy your candles. For some reason I have probably have 5-6 year's worth of lamps, wicks, and oil.

    Or it's hurricane supplies built up for 40 years.
    Candles and lamps emit carbon dioxide. He's screwed.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  7. #172 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    There are four RCPs defined by the IPCC, namely RCP 2.6, 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5. The numbers refer to the W/m^2 forcing generated by the extra CO2 according to the following formula.

    ΔF = 5.35 x ln C/C0 W/m^2

    where C is the CO2 concentration in parts per million by volume and C0 is the reference concentration. The relationship between CO2 and radiative forcing is a logarithmic one, at concentrations up to several times the current value, and thus increased concentrations have a progressively smaller warming effect.

    Not sure what you mean by the Dutch RCP, can you elaborate? RCP8.5 is often referred to as the business as usual scenario and to all.intents and purposes is an impossible scenario. However alarmists love to.use it to scare the horses, as witnessed by the last National Climate Assessment 2018 which was largely based around that.
    False theory and relation. You cannot have two theories of science conflict with each other. One or both must be falsified. That's called the external consistency check, and all theories of science must pass this check.
    This formula conflicts with the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the 1st law of thermodynamics.

    Government canna change the laws of physics, cap'n.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  8. The Following 2 Users Groan At Into the Night For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-25-2020), Diesel (11-26-2020)

  9. #173 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    False theory. You cannot have two theories of science conflict with each other. One or both must be falsified. That's called the external consistency check, and all theories of science must pass this check.
    This formula conflicts with the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the 1st law of thermodynamics.
    So you've said many times and I've also told you that's bullshit many times as well. Go tell Joseph Potsma he's a deluded mofo as well.

    If you really want to understand then you'd read this excellent lecture by Prof. Richard Lindzen but I very much doubt that you will.

    Richard S. Lindzen was Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology until his retirement in 2013. He is the author of over 200 papers onmeteorology and climatology and is a member of the US National Academy of Sciences and of the Academic Advisory Council of GWPF.

    https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uplo...PF-Lecture.pdf
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 11-25-2020 at 10:29 PM.

  10. #174 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    So you've said many times and I've also told you that's bullshit many times as well. Go tell Joseph Potsma he's a deluded mofo as well.
    Argument of the stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacies. The external consistency check is not bullshit. You cannot have two theories of science conflict with each other. One or both of them must be falsified. You have not falsified the 1st law of thermodynamics or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
    Science is not a delusion.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  11. The Following User Groans At Into the Night For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (11-25-2020)

  12. #175 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Argument of the stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacies. The external consistency check is not bullshit. You cannot have two theories of science conflict with each other. One or both of them must be falsified. You have not falsified the 1st law of thermodynamics or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
    Science is not a delusion.
    They don't, the only thing that conflicts is the science and your piss poor understanding of it.

  13. #176 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    NYC & CO
    Posts
    13,926
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 3,615 Posts
    Groans
    2,271
    Groaned 367 Times in 352 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    I'd pegged you as a pretty loathsome character from the start and you've confirmed that estimation in spades. Funnily enough I agree with you regarding RCP2.6, as to it being called Dutch I can't read your mind and wouldn't want to anyway.

    RCPs are concentration pathways used in IPCC AR5. They are pathways for greenhouse gas and aerosol concentrations, together with land use change. They are characterised by the radiative forcing produced by the end of the 21st century. Radiative forcing is the extra heat the lower atmosphere will retain as a result of additional greenhouse gases, measured in Watts per square metre (W/m˛).

    It seems to me that you are confusing Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) and Transient Climate Response (TCR) with RCPs, easy mistake for the ignorant to make. You will have to go elsewhere for enlightenment though, as I'm done dealing with arrogant tossers.
    Let's review. I didn't say a word to you. You jumped in uninvited and challenged me on the RCPs. I responded. That response included the sentence, "Please feel free to correct or supplement anything I wrote." And now I'm an arrogant tosser. I don't have the patience to coddle internet pussies. At least we agree on (the Dutch) RCP 2.6. I feel an ounce of satisfaction every time someone speaks about climate policy with a noticeable education about the subject.

  14. #177 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    NYC & CO
    Posts
    13,926
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 3,615 Posts
    Groans
    2,271
    Groaned 367 Times in 352 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    I didn't say I didn't think your mom had a house........with a basement......
    She does. Is this really the best you can do?

  15. #178 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    NYC & CO
    Posts
    13,926
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 3,615 Posts
    Groans
    2,271
    Groaned 367 Times in 352 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    well he's rich.....maybe he gets his flown in.....
    Yes. I have my electricity delivered by plane. Christ, you're a fucking clown.

  16. #179 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    NYC & CO
    Posts
    13,926
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 3,615 Posts
    Groans
    2,271
    Groaned 367 Times in 352 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Define 'climate science'. Please state the theories of science you are using.
    I already did.

  17. #180 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    NYC & CO
    Posts
    13,926
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 4,815 Times in 3,615 Posts
    Groans
    2,271
    Groaned 367 Times in 352 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    You are defining 'climate change' with another buzzword. Define 'global warming'.

    No gas or vapor is capable warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. See the 1st law of thermodynamics.

    Define 'weather pattern'. Buzzword fallacy.

    Define 'climate change' Buzzword fallacy.

    Define 'climate system'. Buzzword fallacy.

    What impact? Please describe this 'impact'. Define 'global warming'. Define 'climate change'. Define 'climate system'. You are just spewing buzzwords. They are meaningless. Define them.

    Argument of the stick fallacy. Go ahead. I'll just talk behind your back. All you do by putting me on an ignore list is remove yourself from the conversation.

    Insult fallacies. Science is not people, or dumb. It is not a lie. You just deny it. See the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
    You know what the "buzzword" is? It's "buzzword". Just because you're too stupid and dishonest to comprehend universally understood terms does not make them "buzzwords". You have the intellectual maturity of a toddler shoving his fingers in his ears because he doesn't want to hear that it's time to take a bath.

    Global warming is the long-term heating of Earth’s climate system observed since the pre-industrial period due to human activities, primarily fossil fuel burning, which increases heat-trapping greenhouse gas levels in Earth’s atmosphere. The term is frequently used interchangeably with the term climate change, though the latter refers to both human- and naturally produced warming and the effects it has on our planet. It is most commonly measured as the average increase in Earth’s global surface temperature.

    Climate change is a long-term change in the average weather patterns that have come to define Earth’s local, regional, and global climates. These changes have a broad range of observed effects that are synonymous with the term.

    Meteorologists refer to repeating weather as a weather pattern. That's not a buzzword either. You're just a fucking moron. Science doesn't care about you, your blatant lies about science, nor your inability to understand science. You will die and rot; and science, including climate change, global warming, and weather patterns, will never know the difference.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 119
    Last Post: 11-26-2020, 06:41 PM
  2. Breaking: John Kerry Betrays Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders!
    By Cinnabar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 02-03-2020, 04:13 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-14-2019, 01:21 PM
  4. Roger Pielke takes embarrassing National Climate Assessment apart
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-25-2018, 06:10 PM
  5. Why Secretary of State John Kerry Is Flat Wrong on Climate Change
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-22-2014, 10:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •