Howard Stern Asking Harlem Voters...

**Dixie - In Memoriam** · 10-31-2008, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by Onceler

This IS the last laugh, Dix. We told you - over & over again - that Bush was a disaster, and would be for the Republican party.

The party is lost right now, and Tuesday is going to be a very, very bad day for the GOP; it's comeuppance time. And now you're saying that the future is Palin?

Loving it...

Well, unless your Commie Obamie plans to turn us into a Socialist Dictatorship and do away with elections, I don't think it's the 'last laugh'.

I don't give a fuck what you told me, you are a moron. The 'disaster' for the Republican party was nominating John McCain and trying to appeal to 'moderate' people who they thought had a little sense. As we see, they are as clueless as you are, complete and absolute morons.

Go ahead and be a cocky little prick, rub it in real good, because you are going to regret it soon enough. Mark my words, moron!

**Onceler** · 10-31-2008, 09:54 AM

"Mark my words, moron!"

I've marked plenty of your brain-dead words. Virtually none have panned out.

I'll keep marking 'em, though...

Cancel3 · 10-31-2008, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Dixie

Well, unless your Commie Obamie plans to turn us into a Socialist Dictatorship and do away with elections, I don't think it's the 'last laugh'.

I don't give a fuck what you told me, you are a moron. The 'disaster' for the Republican party was nominating John McCain and trying to appeal to 'moderate' people who they thought had a little sense. As we see, they are as clueless as you are, complete and absolute morons.

Go ahead and be a cocky little prick, rub it in real good, because you are going to regret it soon enough. Mark my words, moron!

Nominating McCain in an attempt to get moderates was not the big mistake.

The hardcore republicans are still going to vote for him. They are certainly not voting for Obama. But the hardcore republicans are not enough to get him elected. And the true conservatives have seen that the republican party has abandoned them.

THis election is more about backlash from the Bush years than about any individual candidate. I have said all along, if the democrats didn't win this by a large margin they may as well pack up and close the doors.

**Dixie - In Memoriam** · 10-31-2008, 11:13 AM

Originally Posted by Solitary

Nominating McCain in an attempt to get moderates was not the big mistake.

The hardcore republicans are still going to vote for him. They are certainly not voting for Obama. But the hardcore republicans are not enough to get him elected. And the true conservatives have seen that the republican party has abandoned them.

THis election is more about backlash from the Bush years than about any individual candidate. I have said all along, if the democrats didn't win this by a large margin they may as well pack up and close the doors.

Well, you are just plain wrong. I don't know about "hardcore republicans" but the "hardcore conservatives" are largely not voting for McCain or Obama. Neither one is truly a "conservative" so, what would be their motivation to vote for them? Palin did draw some conservative votes, but her handling by the McCain campaign was abysmal, and she was essentially relegated to being a cute cheerleader for McCain, which probably offended more conservatives than it drew. Had he allowed her to deliver a true conservative message, the one the conservatives were waiting to hear, he MAY have had a chance to win over some of the "hardcore conservatives" he needed, to win the election, instead, he continued to play to the "moderates" who were NEVER going to vote for him.

I agree, much of the Democrat support is a result of backlash against Bush, and just like 1976 gave us Jimmy Carter in the backlash of Watergate, we are about to have another disastrous presidency as a result. What is amazing to me is, how liberals seem to think this puts the final nail in the coffin of conservatism, and it's going to all be smooth sailing from here. I assure you, this is not the case. Our country is largely conservative, and will eventually return to core conservative values in the years to come. That is, if Obama and the Democrat congress don't suspend elections and declare dictatorship.

Cancel3 · 10-31-2008, 11:16 AM

"That is, if Obama and the Democrat congress don't suspend elections and declare dictatorship."

You keep saying that like its an actual threat. Give me a break on the alarmist nonsense.

The liberals said Bush was going to do the same thing. And it was as stupid then as it is now.

**Onceler** · 10-31-2008, 11:20 AM

"we are about to have another disastrous presidency as a result. "

Dixie, honestly - what do you think we just got through?

America is experiencing the worst economy since the Great Depression. Our national debt is at incomprehensible levels. Energy policy has been a shambles, we're mired in 2 wars, people have historically low levels of confidence & the # of people who think we're on the wrong track is the highest in my lifetime.

And you're here as a 2-time voter for this disaster, lecturing us that the NEXT President is going to "mess things up?"

**klaatu** · 10-31-2008, 12:47 PM

Originally Posted by Solitary

I am not afraid of Palin because she brought something valuable to the McCain camp.

I am afraid of Palin because she is clueless. I am afraid of Palin because I don't want someone who believes that dinosaurs were here 4,000 years ago to have the nuclear codes. I am afraid of Palin because she thinks God wants the USA to stand above all other nations. I am afraid of Palin because she thinks God approves of our petty little wars. I am afraid of Palin because she had no qualms about raising taxes on oil companies in Alaska so she could send more money to all the residents.

And anyone is ISN'T scared by those things should rethink what they expect from the government.

You are afraid of Palin because of her Religious views but you are not afraid of Obama or Biden because of their Religious views? We know about Obama's crazy church.., but do you know about the Catholic Church...? Praying to Patron Saints..etc ...?

Cancel3 · 10-31-2008, 12:52 PM

Originally Posted by klaatu

You are afraid of Palin because of her Religious views but you are not afraid of Obama or Biden because of their Religious views? We know about Obama's crazy church.., but do you know about the Catholic Church...? Praying to Patron Saints..etc ...?

Yes, I know all about Obama's church. But the radical views expressed there are racial, not some desire to turn the USA into a theocracy.

When JFK was running there was a widespread fear that the pope would actually be running the US if JFK won. Not exactly how it worked out.

But I have had dealings with fundamentalists that preach the same things Palin's church preaches. They are the reason Blue Laws have hung in so long. They are the ones battling to teach creationism in school science classes. They are the ones who want their religious beliefs made into laws.

And the idea that dinosaurs were here just 4,000 years ago is completely ignoring all scientific evidence to the contrary, and taking the word of a single book. That doesn't bode well for logical thought.

**FUCK THE POLICE** · 10-31-2008, 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by Dixie

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say, I bet Palin runs in 2012, wins the nomination and beats Obama. Someone who has you pinheads in such a twisted tizzy, is hitting on something you are extremely afraid of. I have not seen anyone yet (who I believe) that was planning on voting for McCain until he picked Palin.

But this thread is not the Sarah Palin bashing thread, so let's avoid taking it there. If you have a comment on the clueless and stupid Harlem voters, this is the place for it. If not, move along... go find the Sarah bashing thread, or better yet, start a new one!

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE REPUBLICAN RUN PALIN IN 2012!

**FUCK THE POLICE** · 10-31-2008, 12:54 PM

Originally Posted by Dixie

Get in all the laughs you can Socialists. We'll see who laughs last.

I'm not a member of the Socialist Party USA, although if you'd like to check them out:

http://www.sp-usa.org/

**FUCK THE POLICE** · 10-31-2008, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by Solitary

Nominating McCain in an attempt to get moderates was not the big mistake.

The hardcore republicans are still going to vote for him. They are certainly not voting for Obama. But the hardcore republicans are not enough to get him elected. And the true conservatives have seen that the republican party has abandoned them.

THis election is more about backlash from the Bush years than about any individual candidate. I have said all along, if the democrats didn't win this by a large margin they may as well pack up and close the doors.

I think a lot of independents don't even care that McCain is more moderate than the other people in the party. All they see is an unprincipled hackjob who doesn't even know how to spell L E A D E R, and they immediately jump over to Obama.

**Epicurus** · 10-31-2008, 02:42 PM

The Stern shit is actually pretty hilarious.

**Dixie - In Memoriam** · 10-31-2008, 02:55 PM

Originally Posted by Solitary

"That is, if Obama and the Democrat congress don't suspend elections and declare dictatorship."

You keep saying that like its an actual threat. Give me a break on the alarmist nonsense.

The liberals said Bush was going to do the same thing. And it was as stupid then as it is now.

I don't think it's alarmist at all, it's how most Socialist dictatorships began. First, they stifle the press, then they destroy their enemies, then they usurp power, and finally declare themselves despots. Obama has kicked 'conservative' journalists off his plane, Biden excommunicates a TV station from further interviews, Joe the Plumber and Sarah Palin have had their personal records ransacked, Obamamaniacs are telling me 'this IS the last laugh', it seems to me the only thing left is declaring despotism after the election. But I don't know, maybe they will simply set up a 'fake' system of elections, whereby The Messiah will forever get 100% of the vote, like his namesake, Saddam Hussein? Who fucking knows?

**uscitizen** · 10-31-2008, 02:57 PM

Stifle the press ? You mean like on Iraq coverage ? Yeah it is so much like the Nam coverage isn't it. Those inbedwith reporters are great.

or do you mean like buy the press ?

**Dixie - In Memoriam** · 10-31-2008, 03:25 PM

Originally Posted by uscitizen

Stifle the press ? You mean like on Iraq coverage ? Yeah it is so much like the Nam coverage isn't it. Those inbedwith reporters are great.

or do you mean like buy the press ?

No, I mean like the militant socialist tactic of stifling the press, like Hitler did, like Lenin did, like Mussolini did, like Saddam did, like Chairman Mao did...