CDC Mask Wearing Guidelines

[gfm7175]

I bet you do.

I quite literally just said that I did...

Your level of mistaken science is amazing.

Projection Fallacy.

You pushed your right wing bigotry into science and found you could mold it to back your preconceptions.

Fallacy Fallacy. Bigotry Fallacy. Science is not people; it is a set of falsifiable theories.

It requires amending and lying about the science, You are up to it.

Projection Fallacy.

Corona travels on droplets. That is a fact. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ars-cov-2.html

False Authority Fallacy. Incorrect use of the word 'fact'. Viruses need not travel on or be attached to droplets. Droplets evaporate.

[gfm7175]

Yes I do.

No, you don't.

Now you do understand how it feels?

How what feels?

How so?

You simultaneously argued two opposing positions. (there is no stance; there is a stance) Either there IS one or there ISN'T one...

Your question is based on faulty assumption and premise.

No, it is a valid question.

At least you're honest enough to say that you do not know their motive for the future.

Bogus position assignment.

[AProudLefty]

No, you don't.

Thanks for continuing to prove my point about deciding.

How what feels?

To keep saying RQAA instead of actually answering.

You simultaneously argued two opposing positions. (there is no stance; there is a stance) Either there IS one or there ISN'T one...

No I didn't. There is no "stance" in science, only what the evidence suggests. That's how science works.

No, it is a valid question.

I didn't say that it isn't a valid question. I said that it's a question based on faulty assumption or premise.

Droplets can land on the mask from others who have the virus. And that's assuming they don't land on eyes.

Bogus position assignment.

Nope. You claimed to know their motive and that they'll likely to enforce the mandate further in the future.

[gfm7175]

Thanks for continuing to prove my point about deciding.

To keep saying RQAA instead of actually answering.

I only use RQAA after I've already answered at least once (if not several times) and the same question keeps getting asked again and again...

No I didn't. There is no "stance" in science, only what the evidence suggests. That's how science works.

Yes, you did. And science does not make use of supporting evidence, genius... It only makes use of conflicting evidence.

I didn't say that it isn't a valid question. I said that it's a question based on faulty assumption or premise.

No it isn't, and this is yet another paradox on your part. (my question is valid; my question is not valid)

Droplets can land on the mask from others who have the virus. And that's assuming they don't land on eyes.

Doesn't explain how viruses can enter a mask but not escape through a mask (very same pores)... and that's another reason why masks are stupid; one's eyes are still exposed...

Nope. You claimed to know their motive and that they'll likely to enforce the mandate further in the future.

The CDC does not implement nor enforce mask mandates... GOVERNMENTS do, however... unconstitutionally...

[archives]

Covid does not change mask wearing guidelines... Masks rated at 3,000+ nanometers do not stop particulates of size 100 nanometers... The CDC is full of shit.


See above.


It is being said by the CDC that masks PROTECT the wearer... If you are being PROTECTED from the virus, then there is absolutely no good reason that we cannot return to normal life, and there is absolutely NO good reason to be taking any additional precautions. If masks do NOT protect the wearer, then there is absolutely no good reason to be mandated to wear one... Wake up to the farce, dude...


So? According to the CDC, half the country should be PROTECTED from it... it should only be the SINNERS getting sick, but that's simply not the case... the faithful mask wearers are STILL getting sick all the same...


Correct. I do not wish to be muzzled up by my government, treated like I'm a damn dog... It's sick; it's pathetic; it's Satanic... And guess what, I have yet to get sick either... with ANYTHING, let alone with the big bad rona...


What crisis?? There is no crisis... Covid is everywhere, dude... not just in "non-mask-wearing" areas...


I don't need statistics... I've already provided you with the engineering specs of the masks as well as the specs of the virus. From there, it is simple mathematics. [5] IF masks protect both others and oneself, as the CDC now most recently claims, then why is it such a big deal if a "sinner" chooses not to wear a mask? YOU ARE PROTECTED FROM THE VILE COVID COOTIES, remember??


[6] IF masks protect both others and oneself, as the CDC now most recently claims, then why are mask wearers still getting covid just the same as "sinners" are getting it??

[7] IF mask wearers are still getting covid just the same as "sinners" are getting it, then why the fuck are you still buying into this 'fear porn' and quite literally allowing your government to muzzle you up like a damn dog??


The CDC... the media... Fauci... it was precisely how this whole thing started and how people got talked into doing it... It was supposed to be "temporary", just as the income tax was supposed to be "temporary", just how anything else the government does is "just temporary"... no, it never goes away... once government gets power, they do not relinquish it, and will not relinquish it unless 1776 were to commence once again... Fuck these Satanic fucks!

Wrong, conditions on the ground changed, never said Covid did

No need to, two wrongs don't make a right

You just got done saying masks aren't infallible and then ask why they don't work one hundred percent of the time

Given you have no proof that mask wearers are getting sick at the same rate your attempted point is irrlevant

You are just lazy and don't want to be inconvenienced

So now a once in a generation pandemic isn't a crisis, got to wonder what you think is a crisis

See above regarding proof

See above again

Show us in history where any pandemic with no vaccine, no inherent immunities, nor little effective treatment was temporary, and the rest of your post is pure radio rhetoric

Want to break it down by prepositions and article now?

[gfm7175]

... deleted irrelevancies, bogus position assignments, denials of science, mathematics, engineering, and etc...

No valid argumentation presented.

[AProudLefty]

Yep. That's me every time you assume victory.

I only use RQAA after I've already answered at least once (if not several times) and the same question keeps getting asked again and again...

There is more than two posters here, in case you have forgotten.

When I am asked the same questions from other posters, sometimes I would just repeat, copy and paste my previous posts or link to posts or sources in question.

Yes, you did.

No I did not.

And science does not make use of supporting evidence, genius... It only makes use of conflicting evidence.

Uh wow.

No it isn't, and this is yet another paradox on your part. (my question is valid; my question is not valid)

A question can be valid and yet based on assumptions.

Doesn't explain how viruses can enter a mask but not escape through a mask (very same pores)... and that's another reason why masks are stupid; one's eyes are still exposed...

The masks are quite effective at stopping the droplets from the mask wearers.

[CFM]

Wrong, conditions on the ground changed, never said Covid did

No need to, two wrongs don't make a right

You just got done saying masks aren't infallible and then ask why they don't work one hundred percent of the time

Given you have no proof that mask wearers are getting sick at the same rate your attempted point is irrlevant

You are just lazy and don't want to be inconvenienced

So now a once in a generation pandemic isn't a crisis, got to wonder what you think is a crisis

See above regarding proof

See above again

Show us in history where any pandemic with no vaccine, no inherent immunities, nor little effective treatment was temporary, and the rest of your post is pure radio rhetoric

Want to break it down by prepositions and article now?

^^^^Easily controlled because he's a pussy.

[Nordberg]

I quite literally just said that I did...


Projection Fallacy.


Fallacy Fallacy. Bigotry Fallacy. Science is not people; it is a set of falsifiable theories.


Projection Fallacy.


False Authority Fallacy. Incorrect use of the word 'fact'. Viruses need not travel on or be attached to droplets. Droplets evaporate.

Fallacy fallacy again. The droplets carry Corona and a mask stops them from coming out from a disease-ridden Republican to a harmless law biding Dem. You really can't understand that?

[gfm7175]

... deleted abuse of logical fallacies, repetition fallacies, bigotry fallacies, inversion fallacies...

No valid argumentation presented.