Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

[Earl]

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit … namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day, but not received until after Election Day,” Dershowitz said.

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that, and the state Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic,” he continued. “That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections.”

Citing the Bush v. Gore case in 2000, Dershowitz asserted that President Trump may very well overturn the Pennsylvania election call if he and his legal team can prove that the segregated ballots helped sway the election.

“That was decided [inaudible] in Bush versus Gore, and I think that four-to-four vote would become a five-to-four vote if the issue came before the Supreme Court and there were enough disputed ballots to make a difference in the outcome of the election. That remains to be seen,” he said, later adding: “As I understand the facts of the case — although I think what the judiciary did may have been the right thing morally: if you get your ballot in on time, you shouldn’t be denied the vote just because the post office screwed up — I don’t think you can really make that argument under Article Two. I do think that the Republican argument is the stronger one.”

“The Supreme Court will take that case only if it would make a difference, only if the plaintiffs — the Republicans — can show that the number of disputed ballots that were subject to sequestration by Justice Alito’s decision exceeds the difference between the winning margin and the losing margin,” he concluded, later adding: “The Pennsylvania constitutional argument is a wholesale argument that clearly belongs in federal courts.”


As The Daily Wire reported, Justice Samuel Alito hinted that SCOTUS might take up the Pennsylvania case when he ordered that the state’s election boards segregate ballots that arrived after 8 PM on election day.“

https://www.lawofficer.com/alan-ders...vania-lawsuit/

[katzgar]

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit … namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day, but not received until after Election Day,” Dershowitz said.

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that, and the state Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic,” he continued. “That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections.”

Citing the Bush v. Gore case in 2000, Dershowitz asserted that President Trump may very well overturn the Pennsylvania election call if he and his legal team can prove that the segregated ballots helped sway the election.

“That was decided [inaudible] in Bush versus Gore, and I think that four-to-four vote would become a five-to-four vote if the issue came before the Supreme Court and there were enough disputed ballots to make a difference in the outcome of the election. That remains to be seen,” he said, later adding: “As I understand the facts of the case — although I think what the judiciary did may have been the right thing morally: if you get your ballot in on time, you shouldn’t be denied the vote just because the post office screwed up — I don’t think you can really make that argument under Article Two. I do think that the Republican argument is the stronger one.”

“The Supreme Court will take that case only if it would make a difference, only if the plaintiffs — the Republicans — can show that the number of disputed ballots that were subject to sequestration by Justice Alito’s decision exceeds the difference between the winning margin and the losing margin,” he concluded, later adding: “The Pennsylvania constitutional argument is a wholesale argument that clearly belongs in federal courts.”

As The Daily Wire reported, Justice Samuel Alito hinted that SCOTUS might take up the Pennsylvania case when he ordered that the state’s election boards segregate ballots that arrived after 8 PM on election day.“

https://www.dailywire.com/news/alan-...lvania-lawsuit

When you link to a page not found all you do is prove you are a moron

[Trumpet]

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit … namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day, but not received until after Election Day,” Dershowitz said.

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that, and the state Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic,” he continued. “That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections.”

Citing the Bush v. Gore case in 2000, Dershowitz asserted that President Trump may very well overturn the Pennsylvania election call if he and his legal team can prove that the segregated ballots helped sway the election.

“That was decided [inaudible] in Bush versus Gore, and I think that four-to-four vote would become a five-to-four vote if the issue came before the Supreme Court and there were enough disputed ballots to make a difference in the outcome of the election. That remains to be seen,” he said, later adding: “As I understand the facts of the case — although I think what the judiciary did may have been the right thing morally: if you get your ballot in on time, you shouldn’t be denied the vote just because the post office screwed up — I don’t think you can really make that argument under Article Two. I do think that the Republican argument is the stronger one.”

“The Supreme Court will take that case only if it would make a difference, only if the plaintiffs — the Republicans — can show that the number of disputed ballots that were subject to sequestration by Justice Alito’s decision exceeds the difference between the winning margin and the losing margin,” he concluded, later adding: “The Pennsylvania constitutional argument is a wholesale argument that clearly belongs in federal courts.”

As The Daily Wire reported, Justice Samuel Alito hinted that SCOTUS might take up the Pennsylvania case when he ordered that the state’s election boards segregate ballots that arrived after 8 PM on election day.“

https://www.dailywire.com/news/alan-...lvania-lawsuit

The Daily Wire is a questionable far right news site, so maybe we should take what they post with a grain of salt.

[Trumpet]

Let's not forget that Alan Dershowitz was in cahoot with Epstein, so this might have something to do with his opinion.

[Earl]

When you link to a page not found all you do is prove you are a moron

Try the link now, Katzguts.

If you had really wanted to read it, you could have Googled “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.”

[Earl]

The Daily Wire is a questionable far right news site, so maybe we should take what they post with a grain of salt.

Either he said it or he didn’t, Trumper.

There are several other links on the Google search page.

Just Google “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.”

De nada, Trumper, you lazy slug.

[Trumpet]

Try the link now, Katzguts.

If you had really wanted to read it, you could have Googled “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.”

Earl, I just tried doing an internet search with “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.” and no credible sites came up.

[Earl]

Let's not forget that Alan Dershowitz was in cahoot with Epstein, so this might have something to do with his opinion.

Epstein had lots of friends...Bill Clinton...

His legal knowledge is the issue, not his friends, Trumper.

[Trumpet]

Either he said it or he didn’t, Trumper.

There are several other links on the Google search page.

Just Google “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.”

De nada, Trumper, you lazy slug.

Earl, you calling me a lazy slug demonstrates that you are a frustrated loser.

[Earl]

Earl, I just tried doing an internet search with “Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump Will Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit.” and no credible sites came up.

How do you know that they are not credible, Trumper?

MSM is censoring lots of stories.

You know that.

[Trumpet]

Epstein had lots of friends...Bill Clinton...

His legal knowledge is the issue, not his friends, Trumper.

Earl, Dershowitz is being sued by one of Epstein's victim, but as of yet, nobody has accused Clinton of anything.

[Earl]

Earl, you calling me a lazy slug demonstrates that you are a frustrated loser.

No, it means that I have to do your research for you, Trumper...every day.

[Earl]

Earl, Dershowitz is being sued by one of Epstein's victim, but as of yet, nobody has accused Clinton of anything.

There are photos and passenger logs of old Bill on the Lolita Express.

This has nada to do with the statement by Dershowitz, Trumper.

[Trumpet]

How do you know that they are not credible, Trumper?

MSM is censoring lots of stories.

You know that.

Earl, this is CNN, ABC, NBC. CBS, etc, and none of them have reported this story; real credible news services will not report Trump's disinformation.

[martin]

Who cares? Only around 10,000 ballots are at issue. Biden won the state by more than 50,000.