Real Clear Politics quietly changes Biden to below 270

[Hawkeye10]

I hear you. But one can see the results with timestamps afterward and come to the same conclusions. Pretending that they would somehow change that record afterward is pretty much ignoring that if they were going to do that they could in "real time" as well as all they are doing is posting what happened in the past at that time as well.

OK, but the more time that is allowed to cook the books the more likely that the fraud will succeed.

[Damocles]

OK, but the more time that is allowed to cook the books the more likely that the fraud will succeed.

The best way to ensure that doesn't happen is making sure you have enough poll watchers, the reality is they can pretend it takes as little or as much time as it takes in order to "cook the books" if you aren't there watching. You would think that it was "real time" but in reality it was delayed just enough time for them to "cook the books" so that Hawkeye was fooled into thinking he's able to see that it didn't happen.

Bottom line, if you want elections you trust, participate in more than just voting.

If the folks in the room don't know how many they have to fake because they don't get results from smaller counties until they post theirs too, then it makes their job more difficult.

[Hawkeye10]

The best way to ensure that doesn't happen is making sure you have enough poll watchers, the reality is they can pretend it takes as little or as much time as it takes in order to "cook the books" if you aren't there watching. You would think that it was "real time" but in reality it was delayed just enough time for them to "cook the books" so that Hawkeye was fooled into thinking he's able to see that it didn't happen.

Bottom line, if you want elections you trust, participate in more than just voting.

If the folks in the room don't know how many they have to fake because they don't get results from smaller counties until they post theirs too, then it makes their job more difficult.

We need election officials who want to run clean elections and we need systems in place that can uncover fraud in audits. I dont believe that we currently have either.

[BartenderElite]

The best way to ensure that doesn't happen is making sure you have enough poll watchers, the reality is they can pretend it takes as little or as much time as it takes in order to "cook the books" if you aren't there watching. You would think that it was "real time" but in reality it was delayed just enough time for them to "cook the books" so that Hawkeye was fooled into thinking he's able to see that it didn't happen.

Bottom line, if you want elections you trust, participate in more than just voting.

If the folks in the room don't know how many they have to fake because they don't get results from smaller counties until they post theirs too, then it makes their job more difficult.

The only reason anyone believes that there was massive fraud is because a pathological liar said so.

We're doing a disservice to the volunteers who help us maintain our republic by casting the kind of doubt that we have on this past election. The treatment many have gotten since Trump started lying about it is terrible. The system is good & it worked, and we owe the volunteers who man those polling stations our thanks.

[Doc Dutch]

Tracking in real time the vote counting does however make it harder to commit fraud, which is nothing to sneeze at....but sure.

Which requires computerized voting machines....the same ones the Trumpian cocksuckers are claiming were hacked, thus giving Biden the election.

[Hawkeye10]

Which requires computerized voting machines....the same ones the Trumpian cocksuckers are claiming were hacked, thus giving Biden the election.

No.

[Doc Dutch]

The best way to ensure that doesn't happen is making sure you have enough poll watchers, the reality is they can pretend it takes as little or as much time as it takes in order to "cook the books" if you aren't there watching. You would think that it was "real time" but in reality it was delayed just enough time for them to "cook the books" so that Hawkeye was fooled into thinking he's able to see that it didn't happen.

Bottom line, if you want elections you trust, participate in more than just voting.

If the folks in the room don't know how many they have to fake because they don't get results from smaller counties until they post theirs too, then it makes their job more difficult.

Do you believe the past six Presidential elections have been fair and not altered by fraudulent voting? I do.

[Doc Dutch]

No.

Ahh, you're talking about the magical voting ballot boxes which instantly transmits every vote in every town, no matter how small, to the great Vote Counter in DC. Fascinating.

[redfish]

You have no proof of those claims


It’s why trump and Barr did nothing idiot

the evidence has never been allowed to be presented to any court or the american people. If its all fake why hide it and not allow it in any court? Why not let it be heard and show the people that you libs are right about it? Answer: because you are scared shitless that it will prove that senile joe did not win.

[redfish]

Do you believe the past six Presidential elections have been fair and not altered by fraudulent voting? I do.

But but but you libs claimed for years that Bush cheated, hypocrites

[redfish]

The only reason anyone believes that there was massive fraud is because a pathological liar said so.

We're doing a disservice to the volunteers who help us maintain our republic by casting the kind of doubt that we have on this past election. The treatment many have gotten since Trump started lying about it is terrible. The system is good & it worked, and we owe the volunteers who man those polling stations our thanks.

then why not let all the alleged evidence be presented in court so everyone can see it? Why do you libs oppose proving who you are before voting? admit it, you know that no liberal could ever win without cheating.

[Mr.Badguy]

then why not let all the alleged evidence be presented in court so everyone can see it? Why do you libs oppose proving who you are before voting? admit it, you know that no liberal could ever win without cheating.

They were presented to judges (many of whom were Trump appointees) and dismissed on merit. Why would Trump sabotage himself like that? LMAO

Meanwhile we now know for a fact that several states had people forge elector documents in order to try and cast fraudulent electoral votes for Trump. BUT THE LEFT ARE THE FRAUDSTERS, riiiiiiight.

[Doc Dutch]

But but but you libs claimed for years that Bush cheated, hypocrites

Solid evidence you're both a fucking moron and a liar. First, I'm not a Lib. Second, I agreed Bush won. It came down to SCOTUS and a single county in a single state, IIRC.

What fucked Gore was Nadar, not Bush just like Perot fucked Bush in '92. An election so narrow the Electoral College decided it after a run through SCOTUS.

Pull your head out of your ass, son. You look like a fucking moron like that. Stop lying too. What would your mother say?

[evince]

the evidence has never been allowed to be presented to any court or the american people. If its all fake why hide it and not allow it in any court? Why not let it be heard and show the people that you libs are right about it? Answer: because you are scared shitless that it will prove that senile joe did not win.

Because every judge who saw the claims said they included no evidence


So


There is no evidence that it happened

[evince]

Our courts don’t deal in fucking lies from traitors


There has to be evidence of a claim for a court to hear a claim