Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: Joe Biden challenge: Spend a month without fossil fuels

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Joe Biden challenge: Spend a month without fossil fuels

    .
    Never gonna happen, the old bullshitter is just grandstanding to the gullible.

    Joe Biden wants to get rid of fossil fuels. This is a position that is either ignorant of facts, or simply preying on the lack of knowledge people have on this matter. IT IS NOT JUST ENERGY APPARENTLY, HE HAS NO IDEA HOW MANY PRODUCTS THAT MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER RELY ON PETROLEUM!

    Its not just the idea we are getting off fossil fuels as a source of energy. Products that are directly produced with petroleum or derivatives of petroleum are not even thought of by the average person, who is being indoctrinated by all this. Either Joe Biden does not understand this, or he does and is preying on the lack of knowledge on this matter by an increasingly indoctrinated public.

    So here is the challenge to Joe Biden, win, lose or draw in the upcoming election, I want you your family and staff to spend 1 month off anything that has a link to fossil fuels.

    Here is a list and it is still not a full one, but is a start.

    https://www.innovativewealth.com/inf...e-of-gasoline/

    Does he understand what the elimination of the petroleum industry means, beyond the obvious? Yet its nod and smile by supporters. They have no idea what they are doing and what is most disturbing is either Joe Biden does not, or he does, and is still advocating this.

    Does he think for one second that other countries are not simply going to laugh at all this, step in and do whatever they want? To quote him, “C’mon man!” I appreciate in this case Joe Bidens honesty, but it reveals the shallowness of his position. Or maybe not. Maybe he just knows the average person does not look at the list above, just trusts someone that can smile and look in the camera and say he is from Scranton and Claymont, so trust me.

    His quote from one of his interviews. “I guarantee we are going to eliminate fossil fuels”.

    So this is not really about saving the climate or whatever. We can adapt no matter what the cause if it is a threat. When someone running on this platform, no matter how much he wants to clean it up or hide it, is doing this, there has to be another agenda. Be it Covid, medicare, social security, climate or whatever, the fear industry is hard at work. That is not to say there is no reason for concern and attempts at problem solving. It is to say the shallow idea of getting rid of the lifeline of the American economy energy wise, YET ALONE THE LIST ABOVE, shows it is designed to simply prey on those who have not stopped to think about this. If you are doing things to collapse the lifeline of this country, then one has to question to whom your loyalties lie.

    In my book, The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate War, I specifically dedicate a chapter to addressing the fear, whether I believe it or not, that Joe Biden and his crew are pushing on climate. Instead of spending trillions on combatting what may or may not be a problem, plant trees, build nuclear power plants and use Carbon Capture. All 3 are necessary goods for all concerned and would have little effect on the economy. But the microcosm of this was Biden bringing up people living in the shadow of petrochemical plants that are getting sick. His solution: Do away with entire oil industry and cause more misery for more people. The simple fix and far less costly is to offer to relocate people in an area that is not in the shadow of these plants. And by the way, those fumes you see are not CO2. That is colorless and odorless and is not a pollutant no matter how much you may want to convince people it is. So when Joe Biden says all these plants are throwing pollutants in the air and affecting the health of the people, which may be true, its NOT CO2 YOU SEE.

    No one is against the continued cleaning up of particulate matter, which the United States is a leader in, and China, which has been linked to Joe Biden, is the most egregious example of how to pollute.

    So Joe Biden’s solution is to destroy the lifeline of the American economy and other things brought up above, and do it without people stopping to think about what they are voting for. This is amazing. His whole energy policy has been tried in other countries and failed miserably (Spain and Germany for instance). Failing miserably also is the socialist agendas which no matter how he wants to deceive people, he is covering for. He is not the so called “Old Joe”, with the exception of the fact that he still is deceptive on what he says, though he has graduated from plagiarism in 1987 and lying about grades and insulting someone when he was questioned, to a higher level, that preys on people that do not have the time to look at the entire picture. But back in those days an objective press would not let someone get away with that. Sadly that day is gone.

    Lest you think I am some kind of heartless monster about people living in the shadow of the refineries, let me relay this story. In Rhode Island in the 60s, my family lived in the area of Cranston with much industry around. Many wound up with cancer, and other sicknesses. I have no doubt that air quality in that area was a factor and by the way, it is cleaned up now. My uncle John Conforti, as true a democrat as there was, and I must confess, I was, and still a personal hero to me, got up and blasted the Cranston City council about just allowing industry to run rampant and worship the almighty dollar.

    Joe Biden has his Scranton stories, I have my Cranston ones. Then again I am not running for president. But Uncle John had good reason, since one of the plants blew up in the early 1970s, proving him right about what was happening. My point is Joe Biden was using something where we now have a far better solution, ignoring that, and then saying he is going to shut down an industry which he plainly has NO IDEA (and if he does, its even worse).

    That besides helping fuel your cars (btw where is all the electricity coming from for all these charging stations, which take hours to use anyway) has many products involved in the petrochemical industry that make our lives easier. I dare him, his family and his staff to take a month off from fossil fuels and all they have to do with everyday life. But it is the same story over and over again and unless people wake up and actually do the work to look behind what they are being told, these things are going to come to pass. Once they do, there will be no turning back.

    As for me, I am not taking my own challenge. Because I can not do it. But then again, I know how vital that link is, and I am not the one that is basically advocating not for a so called “progressive policy”, just the opposite. But then again that is the smoke and mirrors that has been a mainstay of this whole agenda, and if one looks closely, was exposed in the debate Thursday night.

    Joe Bastardi is a pioneer in extreme weather and long-range forecasting. He is the author of “The Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won’t Hear From Al Gore — and Others” which you can purchase at the CFACT bookstore.
    https://www.cfact.org/2020/10/24/cha...-fossil-fuels/

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,520
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    How wrong. The idea is to transition off fossil fuels by 2035. How does it make sense to make that suggestion? you should go without them now to prove......something. Do yourself a favor and delete that thread.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    .
    Never gonna happen, the old bullshitter is just grandstanding to the gullible.



    https://www.cfact.org/2020/10/24/cha...-fossil-fuels/
    Are you feeling okay?

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    How wrong. The idea is to transition off fossil fuels by 2035. How does it make sense to make that suggestion? you should go without them now to prove......something. Do yourself a favor and delete that thread.
    Grajonka is in Thailand wearing a Banana Leaf and walking around barefoot. He's not going to miss any 'oil & gas'.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    70,468
    Thanks
    3,125
    Thanked 15,029 Times in 12,559 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,401 Times in 1,345 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    .
    Never gonna happen, the old bullshitter is just grandstanding to the gullible.



    https://www.cfact.org/2020/10/24/cha...-fossil-fuels/
    Maybe 3 hours would be possible but a day not....plastics, food usually heat and AC all require fossil fuels.

    Maybe we chalk this up to dementia?
    This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Hawkeye10 For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-26-2020)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye10 View Post
    Maybe 3 hours would be possible but a day not....plastics, food usually heat and AC all require fossil fuels.

    Maybe we chalk this up to dementia?
    Maybe we chalk this up to propaganda?

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    70,468
    Thanks
    3,125
    Thanked 15,029 Times in 12,559 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,401 Times in 1,345 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Maybe we chalk this up to propaganda?
    Hard to how we can allow any clothes....they all probably used fossil fuels in manufacture and transportation....some of them are made of plastics, which come from fossil fuels.

    Did Joe think of that?
    This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    How wrong. The idea is to transition off fossil fuels by 2035. How does it make sense to make that suggestion? you should go without them now to prove......something. Do yourself a favor and delete that thread.
    Quid Pro Joe has cleverly taken multiple sides to the issue: ban, don't ban, and phase-out. His phase-out plan may or may not begin with ending subsidies and/or use of federal lands, depending upon the day.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye10 View Post
    Hard to how we can allow any clothes....they all probably used fossil fuels in manufacture and transportation....some of them are made of plastics, which come from fossil fuels.

    Did Joe think of that?
    Of course. Did he say he wanted to get rid of fossil fuels?

  11. The Following User Groans At AProudLefty For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-26-2020)

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    70,468
    Thanks
    3,125
    Thanked 15,029 Times in 12,559 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,401 Times in 1,345 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Of course. Did he say he wanted to get rid of fossil fuels?
    Here is the thing about the Left these days....you all tend to say the words that sound good to you, what you wish was true or what you dream is true or what you figure will manipulate those who dont agree with you into standing down or changing their mind....but reality never touched them
    This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Hawkeye10 For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-26-2020)

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Are you feeling okay?
    Yes thanks, are you feeling ok after being humiliated by your gullibility?

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    How wrong. The idea is to transition off fossil fuels by 2035. How does it make sense to make that suggestion? you should go without them now to prove......something. Do yourself a favor and delete that thread.
    You're just not very intelligent Nutberg, still it's too late now.

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    Yes thanks, ate you feeling ok after being humiliated by your gullibility?
    What gullibility?

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye10 View Post
    Here is the thing about the Left these days....you all tend to say the words that sound good to you, what you wish was true or what you dream is true or what you figure will manipulate those who dont agree with you into standing down or changing their mind....but reality never touched them
    In other words, Joe never said those words.

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    70,468
    Thanks
    3,125
    Thanked 15,029 Times in 12,559 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,401 Times in 1,345 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Grajonka is in Thailand wearing a Banana Leaf and walking around barefoot. He's not going to miss any 'oil & gas'.
    You dont know what you are talking about.
    This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.

Similar Threads

  1. Cultsmasher smashes fossil fuels.
    By freshsea in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-09-2020, 08:01 PM
  2. Divestment Has Destroyed Fossil Fuels
    By Cinnabar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-03-2020, 06:19 AM
  3. Creationists Should Not Be Allowed To Use Fossil Fuels
    By PoliTalker in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 06-22-2019, 10:41 PM
  4. Creationists Should Not Be Allowed To Use Fossil Fuels
    By countryboy in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-22-2019, 09:05 AM
  5. Substitutes for fossil fuels.
    By wiseones2cents in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 12-04-2013, 05:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •