Balancing the Supreme Court

[CFM]

Nonsense. It is a solution looking for a problem. The risk/reward of illegal voting is more than sufficient to prevent fraud. Evidence of that is the fact that there isn't any. Can you get through a single post without namecalling? Or is that what you use in place of intelligence?

You mean like the risk/reward for stealing is sufficient enough to prevent stealing?

[CFM]

so because there's a law there's no voter fraud.

He's the kind that would claim he never speeds because a sign that states a limit.

[Grokmaster]

Simple. Merritt Garland was legitimately nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, but the Senate failed to even consider his nomination. In order to correct that, a seat should be added to the Supreme Court and Garland should be considered by the Senate for that open seat, or the person who filled that seat should be removed from the court. Since there is no reason to remove Gorsuch, we'll just have to add one more extra seat that will be appointed by President Biden. Done. No court packing necessary. The balance is restored, conservatives still have a 6-5 majority (it should actually be 5-4 at this point).

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer should make this happen.

Discuss.

OH...SO THAT'S WHAT YOU LYING ASSHOLES ARE CALLING "STACKING THE COURT" NOW , WHILE DECLARING FILLING VACANCIES AS "STACKING THE COURT".


INTELLIGENT AMERICANS LAUGH AT YOU MORONS...