Balancing the Supreme Court

[Concart]

it's called security, ya dumb fucktard.

Nonsense. It is a solution looking for a problem. The risk/reward of illegal voting is more than sufficient to prevent fraud. Evidence of that is the fact that there isn't any. Can you get through a single post without namecalling? Or is that what you use in place of intelligence?

[Concart]

Do you understand the difference between those who pass the laws and those who deem whether laws are Constitutional?

And as a followup, what part of counting a vote that was received after election day is unconstitutional. Can you point me to the section of the constitution that you believe is being violated with that law?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Nonsense. It is a solution looking for a problem. The risk/reward of illegal voting is more than sufficient to prevent fraud. Evidence of that is the fact that there isn't any. Can you get through a single post without namecalling? Or is that what you use in place of intelligence?

what's the risk reward of illegal voting, nonce?

[Concart]

what's the risk reward of illegal voting, nonce?

Commit a felony to cast an extra vote. Who is stupid enough to do that? I mean, besides you.

[Ralph]

Simple. Merritt Garland was legitimately nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, but the Senate failed to even consider his nomination. In order to correct that, a seat should be added to the Supreme Court and Garland should be considered by the Senate for that open seat, or the person who filled that seat should be removed from the court. Since there is no reason to remove Gorsuch, we'll just have to add one more extra seat that will be appointed by President Biden. Done. No court packing necessary. The balance is restored, conservatives still have a 6-5 majority (it should actually be 5-4 at this point).

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer should make this happen.

Discuss.

Who are you attempting to convince that its OK to garner power under any circumstance through any means necessary? YOURSELF? Admit it.........you are watching the Marxist Mocking Bird Left die in front of your own eyes. You are supporting an old rich white senile white man with a demonstrable record of corruption with direct ties to a perverted Son dealing in drugs and child trafficking and you don't bat an eye.

You mean attempt to change the rules again because you can't win under the precedented rules? The false premise? You are not sure if you will ever win another national election after the corruptness exposed in 2020. Just look around........everything about your party is corrupt, hell you are having difficulties even with the media, the FBI, the NSA, Wall Street, BIG TECH, the CIA, CHINA and the world banks carrying your water bucket.

Your post is simply a sign of DESPERATION.

[MAGA MAN]

Simple. Merritt Garland was legitimately nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, but the Senate failed to even consider his nomination. In order to correct that, a seat should be added to the Supreme Court and Garland should be considered by the Senate for that open seat, or the person who filled that seat should be removed from the court. Since there is no reason to remove Gorsuch, we'll just have to add one more extra seat that will be appointed by President Biden. Done. No court packing necessary. The balance is restored, conservatives still have a 6-5 majority (it should actually be 5-4 at this point).

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer should make this happen.

Discuss.

No reason for a court to have balance. 100% strict constructionists would be perfect.

[Yakuda]

No reason for a court to have balance. 100% strict constructionists would be perfect.

A "balanced" court is another one of these leftist fabrications like "social" justice, "unconscious" racism, "micro" aggressions, "safe spaces". Just more tired old made up shit by leftist cockroaches.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Commit a felony to cast an extra vote. Who is stupid enough to do that? I mean, besides you.

so there is no voter fraud because it's illegal? there's no homosexuals in iran either, ahmedinijad said so.

[christiefan915]

Maybe I’m misunderstanding your statement but if RW’s are gloating the court will move to the right, and you say Biden would appoint someone more moderate to replace Breyer, what are RW’s not taking into account?

You are absolutely right and I was wrong. I was looking at the ages of the justices and jumped the gun, should have said Thomas, not Breyer.

You know what they say about screwing up, cawacko... go big or go home.

(Actually "they" didn't say that, I just made it up.)

[christiefan915]

Hello christiefan915,

What am I missing here?

Breyer is one of the remaining 3 liberals on the Court. If he's considering retirement, he would be wise to do it when Democrats have the WH AND the Senate, seeing as how the SCOTUS has now become a political football, thanks to the Republicans.

You didn't miss anything, I did. I screwed up. My head was saying "Thomas" but my hand was typing "Breyer."

<sigh> It's been a long four years.

[Nordberg]

what's the risk reward of illegal voting, nonce?

. It is a class 4 felony in most states A class 5 in some others. That is 1 to 10 years in jail and a 12,500 fine.

[Nordberg]

I read a long article suggesting making the court with 25 judges. That takes a lot of pressure off each judge. It ends the crazy senate hearings and questioning. Judges will die and be replaced regularly and it will not be such a big deal.

[Nordberg]

A "balanced" court is another one of these leftist fabrications like "social" justice, "unconscious" racism, "micro" aggressions, "safe spaces". Just more tired old made up shit by leftist cockroaches.

No. The courts are not supposed to be political., That was always the attempt. Senators voted for opposite party judges if they were qualified, The judges actually answered the senator's questions too. Now the Repubs have made it 100 percent political. It is called winning.

[Yakuda]

No. The courts are not supposed to be political., That was always the attempt. Senators voted for opposite party judges if they were qualified, The judges actually answered the senator's questions too. Now the Repubs have made it 100 percent political. It is called winning.

Did a single retarded leftist democrat vote to confirm Barrett? She was already a judge so there is no reason to believe she wouldn't be appropriate for the Supreme Court. Tell us why she shouldn't be a SC justice. If you ever actually get the balls to answer I bet any reason you give will be political. I am sick and tired of you fucking cockroaches pretending to be do fucking righteous. Go fuck your mother.

BTW you fucking moron 3 democrats vote to approve barrett for her court of appeals job so there is no reason to believe barrett shouldn't have been a easy approval to the SC but you shit eating fuckers voted strict party line. You leftist cockroaches are less than human.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

. It is a class 4 felony in most states A class 5 in some others. That is 1 to 10 years in jail and a 12,500 fine.

so because there's a law there's no voter fraud.