Page 8 of 16 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 228

Thread: Balancing the Supreme Court

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Are you saying it's unlimited?
    It would limit banning newspapers or guns.

    Like you, the Democrats want to impose laws that negate the spirit of the Constitution without breaking it. Which is why they claim they don't want to ban guns, just certain types and you want to ban freedom of choice.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  2. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    How are the repubs being hypocritical? I haven't challenged everyone if the leftist cockroaches here to deny that the demstapo would do the same thing in the same situation. As of this very second not a single one has had the balls to deny it. Fuck that hypocrite bullshit.
    I can't believe you are so fucking stupid you can't see the hypocrisy in jamming through an appointment when it was the Republicans who said before it wasn't appropriate close to an election.

    Just another reason why I think you are immoral. You can't see immoral acts such as hypocrisy for what they are.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  3. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Proving they are as hypocritical as the fucking Republicans. Welcome to modern American politics.
    Not real sure how they can call someone a hypocrite, which is a moral concept, when doing so would involve pushing on others what they say is wrong to push on others.

  4. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Dutch Uncle,

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    The Senate advised and consented not to consider the nomination in an election year. Legal. With Barrett they advised and consented to consider the nomination. Legal. Moral? Not much.

    Here's your logic:
    1 - Republicans are wrong.
    2 - My proof: https://www.archives.gov/founding-do...ion-transcript
    3 - Democrats are allowed to be wrong too.


    All you are doing is pushing tit-for-tat partisan politics like the Republicans are doing. There's a reason why 70% of Americans aren't Democrats and why 70% of Americans aren't Republicans. Both parties suck ass and serve themselves first, not the American public.
    That's like saying all presidents lie so Trump is no worse.

    That's BS.

    It is a matter of degree.

    And btw, Obama did not lie with the keep your doctor thing.

    If you had your own policy, not through an employer, you could be grandfathered in and keep it.

    Technically what he said was true.

    He did not lie.

    Obamacare included a grandfather clause.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  5. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    It would limit banning newspapers or guns.

    Like you, the Democrats want to impose laws that negate the spirit of the Constitution without breaking it. Which is why they claim they don't want to ban guns, just certain types and you want to ban freedom of choice.
    Are you saying all rights are unlimited? 2nd request

  6. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    You think this is new??? LMFAO
    No. Why do you think it's new?
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  7. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    29,740
    Thanks
    2,748
    Thanked 10,875 Times in 8,272 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 594 Times in 590 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    I can't believe you are so fucking stupid you can't see the hypocrisy in jamming through an appointment when it was the Republicans who said before it wasn't appropriate close to an election.

    Just another reason why I think you are immoral. You can't see immoral acts such as hypocrisy for what they are.
    I can't believe you're so fucking stupid that you can't see I never denied the hypocrisy. This is precisely what's wrong with you fucking assholes. What I don't want to see is you fucking lying hypocritical bastards calling someone else hypocritical. Make the claim right now that the left wouldn't do the same thing in the same situation and your a fucking lying hypocritical piece of horse shit.

    The last fucking thing I care about is what some fucking leftist shit stain thinks of me morally.

  8. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    29,740
    Thanks
    2,748
    Thanked 10,875 Times in 8,272 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 594 Times in 590 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    No. Why do you think it's new?
    Then why did you write welcome to modern politics asshole?

  9. #114 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Are you saying all rights are unlimited? 2nd request
    No, but it doesn't surprise me you don't understand the difference.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  10. #115 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    Then why did you write welcome to modern politics asshole?
    Because you are saying politics today is no different than it was under Reagan in 1981. It's not. Only assholes would claim it's the same.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  11. #116 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    No, but it doesn't surprise me you don't understand the difference.
    It doesn't surprise me that you claim there is one, do not support the claim, then try to blame me for your failures.

  12. #117 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    I can't believe you're so fucking stupid that you can't see I never denied the hypocrisy. This is precisely what's wrong with you fucking assholes. What I don't want to see is you fucking lying hypocritical bastards calling someone else hypocritical. Make the claim right now that the left wouldn't do the same thing in the same situation and your a fucking lying hypocritical piece of horse shit.

    The last fucking thing I care about is what some fucking leftist shit stain thinks of me morally.
    Psycho. How many times have the police paid you a visit for domestic abuse?
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  13. #118 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    29,740
    Thanks
    2,748
    Thanked 10,875 Times in 8,272 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 594 Times in 590 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Because you are saying politics today is no different than it was under Reagan in 1981. It's not. Only assholes would claim it's the same.
    Where did I say that you fucking idiot. Copy and paste my words you duplicitous fuck.

  14. #119 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Dude, you're reaching. Was the Justice seat filled or not?
    Wrong question. Did the Senate provide advice and consent to the pick of the President of the United States? No they did not. They could have denied consent, but they can't just pass on the role. Because the role is required by the Constitution. It isn't a reach at all. Let's break it down.

    The President was Barack Obama.
    The nominee was Merrick Garland
    The Senate refused to consider (advice and consent) the nominee, as called for by the Constitution. Tell me how you would describe the action. This is not LACK of action. It is a decision to NOT provide advice or consent.

    So the fact that the seat was filled is irrelevant.

  15. #120 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,607
    Thanks
    46,754
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yakuda View Post
    Where did I say that you fucking idiot. Copy and paste my words you duplicitous fuck.
    When you calm down, we can talk.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-18-2020, 09:37 AM
  2. The (U.K.) Supreme Court has seized supreme power
    By Tranquillus in Exile in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2019, 02:38 PM
  3. Replies: 73
    Last Post: 10-01-2018, 06:54 PM
  4. APP - It is all about the Supreme Court
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2016, 09:47 AM
  5. Balancing the Budget
    By Mott the Hoople in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 05:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •