Blacks go Massive for Biden

[jakemax]

you low IQ opioid addled morons are low IQ deug addled lorons. https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kno...-retraction-of

Fake news from a real traitor.

[Legion]

But they've also been relentlessly groomed by slave trader democrats for decades, so they really don't know which way is up anymore.

Please. Pollsters have no idea who is voting, who they will vote for if they vote, who has voted, or who anyone did vote for.

[Legion]

Fake news from a real traitor.

He's old AF. Poor thing.

I am 68

And that was in June 2018.

[Legion]

nigger

[jakemax]

I'm 68 too. But unlike the leftist shit stains here I have kept my sanity.

[Legion]

Not true either, “admonish,” no, pointed out the insignificance of it, yes, often, citing that anything xyz out from an election is meaningless

So you say.

[jakemax]

You're just the type that would fuck a fat-assed, snaggle-toothed nigger thinking you've done something.

The proper way to address those folks is "jigaboo".

Not like this:

[Earl]

Precious.

Anchovies can't remember what he has posted.

Good grief.

[Legion]

jigaboo

[CFM]

The proper way to address those folks is "jigaboo".

Not like this:

When blacks use the term and don't consider it a problem, no one can claim it is.

[Legion]

When blacks use the term and don't consider it a problem, no one can claim it is.

"Blacks" don't get to decide what words mean. Neither do you, and neither do I.

[CFM]

"Blacks" don't get to decide what words mean. Neither do you, and neither do I.

I just did.

[gfm7175]

That’s misleading,

No, it's not. While it might not actually pan out that way when all is said and done, it is not misleading. What is actually misleading is comparing the RAW 2020 numbers against the RAW 2016 numbers, as MSNBC, CNN, and other outlets are currently doing...

what you are saying is that any separated voting entity can not be separated and compared unless it is weighted against the total electorate at the conclusion of the last election

I'm saying that it is important to note what the make-up of the electorate is when comparing numbers like this... While 205k looks impressive when compared against the 25k of 2016, it is nothing to be excited about when the 10% share of the youth vote is factored into the return numbers... To retain a 10% share of the vote, as they had last time, they needed to be at 267k votes at that point in time, but they were only at 205k (which means that youth votes are only making up a 7.68% share of the electorate this time around (so far)... This is not gospel by any means, but it is also not a good indicator sign for Dems...

I do believe what the outlet was saying is that the youth vote is up, considerably in comparison to 2016, and consequently, if it represented 10% of the total electorate in 2016 it should make up a greater percentage of the final vote in 2020.

The outlet said nothing about the electorate shares by age range... It solely compared raw 2020 numbers against raw 2016 numbers and acted as if that was such a great thing for Dems... They don't understand basic mathematics.

You are employing 2016 final percentages and numbers to characterize what they are saying while they are working with indicators with a week to go in the election

I am pointing out that they don't understand basic mathematics.

Three men walked into a hotel looking for a room. The employee at the front desk told them he had one room available for thirty dollars, ten dollars apiece, so the men split the cost. Little later, the front desk clerk though he overcharged the men and gave the bell hop five dollars to return to the men. On the way to the room, the bellhop couldn’t decide how to split the five dollars so he gave each man a dollar back and kept the two dollars for himself. Ultimately each man thus paid nine dollars for the room, the bellhop pocketed two dollars, three times nine is twenty seven, plus two is twenty nine, what happened to the other dollar?

Get the point?

No. It has nothing to do with what I'm saying.

A 7.68% share of the electorate this time, compared against a 10% share of the electorate last time, is NOT good for Dems... We are seeing this same issue amongst black people...

Black people and college-aged people seem to be turning out weaker than they did in 2016... NOT a good sign for Dems...

[AProudLefty]

Earl the Groaner is alright?

[AProudLefty]

When blacks use the term and don't consider it a problem, no one can claim it is.

I guess it's okay for me to call you a retarded redneck.