The Joe Biden corruption scandal explained

[Concart]

Present some, and we'll see.

Already did. Results as expected.

[Legion]

Yeah, must be the News Corp didn't get the message, he is still listed as the Executive Director.

Does that mean he controls content?

It says that those who are echoing the narrative can't even agree if it is legitimate or not

Does it? Who told you that?

[Legion]

Yes and yes.

How's that? because you say so?

https://www.businessinsider.com/no-e...-china-2020-10

That says some reporters disagreed with an opinion writer. Is that evidence that the allegations against the Bidens are false?

[Legion]

He does. Until called out on them. Then he crumbles like the wimpy little fuck he is.

He already flounced from the forum once, Cap'n.

Looking at the threads on the front page has finally tipped me to the logical conclusion that this is not Political discussion board. It is a garbage dump populated by and catering to White Nationalists. I might give it a try after the election when their voices have been silenced, but attempts at discussion here are an exercise in futility. You win. It's all yours.

[Legion]

Already did.

Where? Quote them.

[Concart]

How's that? because you say so?



That says some reporters disagreed with an opinion writer. Is that evidence that the allegations against the Bidens are false?

Nope. The reporters did not disagree with anything. They reported that there was no evidence that Joe Biden received any money from China. Which is, of course, evidence that the allegations against JOE BIDEN are false. Which word are your having trouble with? I couldn't care less if Hunter Biden tore off his clothes in Times Square and did the Macarina.

[Concart]

Where? Quote them.

I'm sorry you can't read. Not playing.

[Sailor]

He already flounced from the forum once, Cap'n.

Yes. Ran away. He is good at that. Wimpy, uneducated idiot.

[Concart]

He already flounced from the forum once, Cap'n.

Looks like I changed my mind. Oh the horror!!!! I haven't changed my mind about keeping Sailor on ignore. See how that works?

[Legion]

Not playing.

So you can't cite a single factual source to substantiate your claim, as I suspected.

Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

Your claim is

[archives]

Does that mean he controls content?



Does it? Who told you that?

Right, Rupert Murdoch, and his son who is second in command, don't have control over the empire they have built, you should have been happy with the regardless I gave you earlier

Nobody has to tell anyone anything, common sense, the message they are trying to send is even questioned by those sending it, really not all that difficult

[Sailor]

Where? Quote them.

He just google the first thing he could find. Lets see if he can refute any of this. Note the source: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/med...port_FINAL.pdf

[Legion]

I haven't changed my mind about keeping Sailor on ignore.

So you say.

Do his words frighten you?

[The Anonymous]

Let me explain it. Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

Use your words. See how easy that was? Debating by video is for the feeble minded.

Got proof?

[Sailor]

Looks like I changed my mind. Oh the horror!!!! I haven't changed my mind about keeping Sailor on ignore. See how that works?

Yawn. Once you got your wimpy ass kicked you never forget it. Been hiding ever since wimpy.