The Joe Biden corruption scandal explained

[The Anonymous]

[Concart]

Let me explain it. Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

Use your words. See how easy that was? Debating by video is for the feeble minded.

[Nordberg]

Isn't it odd that this fabrication came out with less than 3 weeks to the election? Just a weird coincidence? Nope, just Repubs being Repubs. Dirty and dishonest politicians are who they are. This is so clumsy and obvious that it should fool nobody. You can see why Rudy has no credibility left.

[Legion]

Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

Who told you that?

[Legion]

Isn't it odd that this fabrication came out with less than 3 weeks to the election?

Who told you it's a "fabrication"?

[archives]

"Explained" by Lou Dobbs on Fox TV, right, which you like me to post a Rachel Maddox video explaining why it all is a bunch of malarkey?

[Concart]

Who told you that?

The intelligence agencies. You should get out more.

[archives]

Let me explain it. Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

Use your words. See how easy that was? Debating by video is for the feeble minded.

The scenario with the reporters is pretty telling, and on top of that, the WSJ also had a conflict between its editorial writers and news reporters, says a lot when Murdoch can't get his people all in on the effort

[Concart]

Isn't it odd that this fabrication came out with less than 3 weeks to the election? Just a weird coincidence? Nope, just Repubs being Repubs. Dirty and dishonest politicians are who they are. This is so clumsy and obvious that it should fool nobody. You can see why Rudy has no credibility left.

Of course it's not odd. Clumsy and obvious is correct, however. The White House was told by their own intelligence agencies that Russia was actively using Guliani, but they ignored it. Because, well, they HAD to ignore it or there would be no 'story'. Credit to Fox News for not being duped.

[Legion]

The intelligence agencies.

Did they?

Cite the reports from "the intelligence agencies" that supposedly told you that "Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it"

Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it.

I'll wait.

[Legion]

Says a lot when Murdoch can't get his people all in on the effort

Rupert Murdoch is retired, Anchovies.

https://www.stackingbenjamins.com/spend-billion-dollars-advice-rupert-murdoch/

[Legion]

"Explained" by Lou Dobbs on Fox TV, right, which you like me to post a Rachel Maddox video explaining why it all is a bunch of malarkey?

You think that claiming some pundits said something on TV (which you didn't even link to) constitutes "proof" of your claim that it's a "fabrication", Anchovies?

[Nordberg]

Of course it's not odd. Clumsy and obvious is correct, however. The White House was told by their own intelligence agencies that Russia was actively using Guliani, but they ignored it. Because, well, they HAD to ignore it or there would be no 'story'. Credit to Fox News for not being duped.

The whole thing started over a year ago. The FBI said Rudy was being compromised by Russians and should be watched. He was wrapped up by black ops. Rudy and the reds did not care. They waited until the last minute and spring their fake October surprise. The dems do not have the time to investigate. Reds are such dirty politicians and so proud of it.

[Concart]

Did they?

Cite the reports from "the intelligence agencies" that supposedly told you that "Russia falsified information and gave it to a dupe (Rudy Guliani) who then gave it to another dupe (Rupert Murdoch) who published it in the New York Post under the byline of a reporter that had no idea the story existed, because the original reporter wanted nothing to do with it"



I'll wait.

Okay, maybe you should hold your breath as well. I guess logic isn't your strong suit. When the intelligence community says Russia is using Guiliani, and then Guliani gives the Post a story that no one can verify, well, do the math. Or don't. I couldn't care less what you think. I'm simply explaining the facts to you. You can do as you please with them. No skin off my nose.

[Irish]

Dude is getting pay to play from the Chinese. He should be ineligible to run!