Biz Partner Confirms Hunter/China business dealings w/father

[Legion]

Ah, most of the right, here’s a sample for you

Jim Jordan is not "most of the right", Anchovies, and Rep. Jordan did not say "that the accusations against Trump were nothing but hearsay because no one heard Trump directly say he wanted the Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden".

[Legion]

I posted a question, not an accusation!

Chances are you won't get the benefit of the doubt.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...s-of-the-Board!

[Nomad]

I posted a question, not an accusation!

You posted an insinuation.

Read 12b.

[CFM]

You posted an insinuation.

Read 12b.

What a fucking pussy. What else can be expected from someone that issues a challenge and cries when he realizes that I have no problem accepting it.

Unannounced.

[Trumpet]

Well, no, Trumper.

Hunter’s former business partner has confirmed that the “big guy” is Joe and the 10% set aside was for him.

Watch FOX, CNN snd MSNBC won’t cover it.

Why do you think that CNN or MSNBC won't cover it?????????????????????????

[Nomad]

I am such a fucking pussy. What else can be expected from someone that issues a challenge and hides when he realizes that you have no problem accepting it.

Unannounced.

You don't need to announce what a pussy you are.

It's common knowledge.

[Nomad]

Chances are you won't get the benefit of the doubt.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...s-of-the-Board!

He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

There is no doubt about what he insinuated.

[Legion]

He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. There is no doubt about what he insinuated.

So send Rana a PM. She's always anxious to enforce the rules when the circumstances suit her.

[CFM]

You don't need to announce what a pussy you are.

It's common knowledge.

You were the one that cried when I told you how I'd show up. That's the sign of a pussy.

[CFM]

He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

There is no doubt about what he insinuated.

To make the claim about there being no doubt would assume that anyone believes what you claim.

[Wolverine]

Chances are you won't get the benefit of the doubt.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...s-of-the-Board!

I never mentioned anything sexual!

[Wolverine]

He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

There is no doubt about what he insinuated.

Liar I never mentioned sex!

[Wolverine]

Why do you think that CNN or MSNBC won't cover it?????????????????????????

Are you being seriousCNN, and MSNBC are the Democrat media outlets period, they have been on a non stop smear campaign of Trump for four years you absolute idiot! Please deny it so I can laugh some more!

[Wolverine]

Look up the definition of Thai Ladyboy, redneck idiot.

The "boy" part of the word refers to young, adult males who look like females.

Stupid pathetic fuck.

That asshole buddy of yours specifically accused me of having an interest in "children", verbatim.

That is a blatant 12b violation.

Listen if you want to speak to me and call me names how about you come to OHIO and do in person! You have a big mouth, back it up internet tough guy!

[Trumpet]

Are you being seriousCNN, and MSNBC are the Democrat media outlets period, they have been on a non stop smear campaign of Trump for four years you absolute idiot! Please deny it so I can laugh some more!

The ethical news organization won't air a story without verifying it first, unlike like the right wing tabloids, and this story at this point is quite porous.