NY Post Reporter Behind Dubious Hunter Biden Story Refused to Put His Name on It

[christiefan915]

"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/ny...rt/ar-BB1aaVV2

[Legion]

"according to a Sunday report in the New York Times...According to the Times...said the report...."....

[Hawkeye10]

As a regular reader of the NYP it is clear to me that the Revolution has infiltrated staff here just as it has with other journalism outfits, just not as fast and far as most of the rest.

[coldjoint]

"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/ny...rt/ar-BB1aaVV2

And that makes him different than the person or persons that said Trump called our soldiers losers? How? What is different is there is actual evidence supporting what he or she said.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Don't expect to see that reply on Twitter

[Doc Dutch]

"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/ny...rt/ar-BB1aaVV2

Could it be because he doesn't want to be put in the same category of "Sucker" as Rudy Giuliani?

Meanwhile, even Rudy has his doubts: https://www.the-sun.com/news/1648049...mp-russia-spy/

Rudy Guilani said on Friday there's a '50/50' chance the person he worked with to get dirt on Hunter Biden is a Russian spy.

[coldjoint]

Could it be because he doesn't want to be put in the same category of "Sucker" as Rudy Giuliani?

Meanwhile, even Rudy has his doubts: https://www.the-sun.com/news/1648049...mp-russia-spy/

Rudy Guilani said on Friday there's a '50/50' chance the person he worked with to get dirt on Hunter Biden is a Russian spy.

The person behind the information in the Steele dossier is also a 50/50. That is what Obama's FBI signed off on as credible.

[Doc Dutch]

The person behind the information in the Steele dossier is also a 50/50. That is what Obama's FBI signed off on as credible.

All instances of malfeasance should be investigated. Regardless if it's about Bident, Trump, Ivanka or Hunter. Investigate and, if warranted, prosecute to the full extent of the law.

Obviously there's no malfeasance found over the past four years. Trump has had more of his friends locked up than Obama Democrats.

[gemini104104]

The reason the NYPost reporter refused to put his name on the tabloid type trash against the Bidens, is that it is tabloid type trash.

[christiefan915]

The reason the NYPost reporter refused to put his name on the tabloid type trash against the Bidens, is it is tabloid type trash.

I love this quote:

Thomas Rid, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies,

that the story should be approached with caution, and noted that it’s an “old Cold War disinformation tactic to pass information, especially but not exclusively when forged, to low-brow newspapers that have high circulation and low standards of investigation. Ideal for surfacing and amplification.”

[Doc Dutch]

I love this quote:

Thomas Rid, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies,

that the story should be approached with caution, and noted that it’s an “old Cold War disinformation tactic to pass information, especially but not exclusively when forged, to low-brow newspapers that have high circulation and low standards of investigation. Ideal for surfacing and amplification.”

Trump is a master showman. He knows how to get ratings.

[Bigdog]

Trump is a master showman. He knows how to get ratings.

"Whether you love me or hate me, you gotta vote for me."
--Donald J. Trump

[Doc Dutch]

"Whether you love me or hate me, you gotta vote for me."
--Donald J. Trump

"Proud Boys. Stand back and stand by."

[Althea]

"Credibility concerns," no kidding. Everybody except die-hard trumpers knows this story is bogus.

"The New York Post reporter behind last week's cover story on Hunter Biden wouldn't put his name on the piece, according to a Sunday report in the New York Times. The report says the story was written primarily by Bruce Golding, who didn't want his byline on the piece because of "credibility" concerns.

Not only that, according to the report, but one of the reporters whose name did appear on the story about the Democratic nominee's son only learned she'd been credited after publication. The Post said the source material for the post had come from a laptop belonging to Biden that was left at a repair shop...

...According to the Times, however, Dorsey wasn't the only person to take issue with the Post's reporting methods when it came to the Biden piece. Post staffers, said the report, were worried their paper hadn't done enough to verify the authenticity of the laptop and its contents. Some, the Times report said, worried about their sources and the timing of the story, which came just weeks from the election.

A representative for the Post did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/ny...rt/ar-BB1aaVV2

I like the part about Rudy refusing to share the info with any news outlet that would check for validity.

[Guno צְבִי]

I love this quote:

Thomas Rid, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies,

that the story should be approached with caution, and noted that it’s an “old Cold War disinformation tactic to pass information, especially but not exclusively when forged, to low-brow newspapers that have high circulation and low standards of investigation. Ideal for surfacing and amplification.”

Going to school in NYC in the 50's and 60's in school we had a current events class once a week, each kid would bring in a clipped news article to discuss. In NYC at the time had 7 daily papers :the New York Times, the New York Herald Tribune, the New York Journal-American, the World Telegram and Sun, the New York Mirror, the Daily News and the New York Post. Out of all the papers The NY post was known back then as a low brow, yellow journalism paper written in a 6 grade level with lots of pictures

[Bigdog]

"Proud Boys. Stand back and stand by."

30 weirdos who say they are against cargo shorts and masturbation.


Why do Democrats promote them. You treat them like rock stars, ffs.