Members banned from this thread: Phantasmal, CharacterAssassin, ThatOwlWoman, Nordberg, Charoite and Walt


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Prince Andrew, the oligarchs and a new bombshell for Joe Biden:

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Strumpet View Post
    I hope that you don't consider the tripe that you post to be logic.
    I don't expect you to recognize logic when you see it, so there's that.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I am only pointing out what your reply was, nothing more. An ad hominem by definition in an argument is meant to deflect and distract.
    Poor Strumpet either had no education or failed to benefit from one when given the opportunity.

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,072
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    If Dementia Joe wins, he will be removed for his connection to his corrupt son and Burisma or for:

    Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution reads: In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President.

    Take your pick, he would be gone in within a few months...weeks.

    Then the horizontal Marxist...
    Then President Harris!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    Trump's Brain (10-17-2020)

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,072
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    And, the response to this scandal is more ad hominem...
    How the hell is that ad hominem? LOL.

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,681
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,307 Times in 13,426 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 843 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    How the hell is that ad hominem? LOL.
    Maybe somebody never took a class in Latin...

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    dukkha (10-17-2020)

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,072
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Maybe somebody never took a class in Latin...
    Thanks for confirming you don't know what it means.

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,681
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,307 Times in 13,426 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 843 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Thanks for confirming you don't know what it means.
    I know what it means. Ad hominem is To the man. There are plenty of Lefties here that don't. The same ones never recognize sarcasm either.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,072
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I know what it means. Ad hominem is To the man. There are plenty of Lefties here that don't. The same ones never recognize sarcasm either.
    Exactly. An insult or name calling to the man (in this case, the OP).

  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    343
    Thanks
    182
    Thanked 83 Times in 62 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 25 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    America's convulsed over pictures of the former vice president's son. But as GUY ADAMS uncovers his links to a suspect regime (and the Duke of York) just how much damage can he cause?
    .
    Hunter Biden is a 50-year-old American lawyer whose elderly father Joe hopes in just over a fortnight to unseat Donald Trump at the U.S. Presidential election.

    He's also a twice-married father of five kids (one via a fleeting affair with a former stripper) who has struggled with cocaine and alcohol addiction for most of his adult life and in 2014, when his dad was Barack Obama's Vice President, managed to get booted out of the U.S. Naval Reserve for failing a drug test.

    This week saw a vintage 'October surprise' when the New York Post obtained footage of Hunter variously: lying in bed smoking a crack pipe; reclining in the bath with a cigarette hanging out of his mouth; and starring in a 12-minute mobile phone video that, in the newspaper's words, saw him hoofing class A narcotics 'while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman'.

    Most sensationally — if you believe the Trump camp, that is — it also published leaked emails that appear to implicate Joe in long-standing controversy over his son's rackety business career. To understand why, you must first know that Biden Jr has for years been criticised for his lucrative but ethically questionable work overseas, which has often created apparent conflicts of interest with Joe's official roles.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...den-cause.html
    So if the NY Post story isn't total bullshit (which it likely is) Biden has a son with issues. So what?

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    And, the response to this scandal is more ad hominem...
    Have you noticed how all these imbeciles rush to that same website to validate their bullshit? This is what Wikipedia says about them.

    The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-10-2020, 11:58 AM
  2. ANDREW CUOMO WILL REPLACE BIDEN AS DEMOCRAT'S PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE
    By Dachshynddawg in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 03-31-2020, 11:22 AM
  3. I Don’t Know Prince Andrew,’ Trump Says. Photos Say Otherwise.
    By Guno צְבִי in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-03-2019, 10:05 PM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-22-2019, 08:24 AM
  5. What Must New Yorkers do to unseat Prince Andrew the SonofaCuomo?
    By Boris The Animal in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-24-2018, 06:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •