"The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
"Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
"Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
"Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
"Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
"no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
"Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
"Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams
"The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
"Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
"Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
"Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
"Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
"no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
"Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
"Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams
"The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
"Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
"Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
"Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
"Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
"no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
"Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
"Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that does not understand what 'fact' means. No dictionary defines any word. No dictionary owns any word.
A fact is an assumed predicate. Nothing more. The facts that Arminius has shown are referenced across actual events, and recorded in a wide variety of news media as well as government records. Your denial of these events and records is not valid.
"The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
"Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
"Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
"Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
"Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
"no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
"Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
"Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams
Setting aside your usual lies, and blather, here are YOUR words:
"1) The McConnell rule is that you don't approve SCOTUS appointees during an election year if the previous election turned the Senate over to the opposition party.
2) Election 2014 turned the Senate over to the opposition party, Election 2018 did not.
3) Therefore, it makes sense to not have approved in Obama's case, and to approve in Trump's case."
And here is yet another of your "intelligent" insights"
"The irony of the guy who can't comprehend that "recently" means the most recent election...smearing anyone else as "low IQ".
Now, you can quit sucking Earls virtual dick, and face reality, or you can just continue doing what you do best, LYING
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
The Supremes are lifetime seats. The Reds cheated to get their absolutely far right wingers on the court happily lying to all. They do not want the same treatment turned on them. The question is do the Dems reward the reds cheating and quietly sit while the Mcconnel and Federalist Society picks are slanting the court decisions to favor Xtians and billionaires for decades. Or do they change the numbers on the court to achieve that balance the voters have given us and the Repubs have ignored.
Many Dems do have respect for the constitution and what the founders were trying to create. The Reds don't care about any if that. McConnell and Trump laugh in your face when you talk about that. It is what Repugs call winning.
Into the Night (10-19-2020)
Into the Night (10-19-2020)
Into the Night (10-19-2020)
I have demonstrated my point repeatedly. You being too stupid to comprehend how the McConnell rule was always designed to work is not other people lying. It's you being an unteachable mouth-breather.
Correcting your provably false lies about the McConnell rule is not "blather" at all. This is just butthurt lashing out from someone who can't handle being proven wrong.
1) I do not dispute that I said any of these things.
2) Nothing you've posted here demonstrates any kind of lying.
3) Again, you being too low-IQ to follow this incredibly straightforward logic isn't other people lying.
Into the Night (10-19-2020)
Bend over, we are packing. 😡
Into the Night (10-19-2020)
"YOUR POINT" yet no proof that it is valid save for YOUR OPINION. The McConnell "rule" has never been used in the history of the country.
Sorry if I don't accept your lies as proof of anything. However, just to prove my point, show me where McConnell got the authority to modify, alter, or amend, the Constitution in such a way as to alter the power of a sitting President.Correcting your provably false lies about the McConnell rule is not "blather" at all. This is just butthurt lashing out from someone who can't handle being proven wrong.
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Bookmarks