Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Supreme Court backs Ohio officials in election dispute

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,656
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 874 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 39 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Supreme Court backs Ohio officials in election dispute

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court is backing Ohio elections officials in an ongoing dispute over allegations of voter registration fraud.

    The justices in an unsigned opinion Friday blocked a lower court order directing the Ohio Secretary of State -- a Democrat -- to update the state's voter registration database after information provided by some newly registered voters did not match up with Social Security and driver registration numbers.

    The state Republican party had asked for enforcement of a temporary restraining order, but the justices ultimately denied that request.

    The appeal, from Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner and other elections officials, follows a Tuesday ruling from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati that sided with the state GOP.

    It ordered Brunner to create a system by Friday to provide a list of newly registered voters whose Social Security numbers or driver's license numbers do not match their names.

    By reversing the lower courts decision, Brunner said in a statement that the Supreme Court's had "protected the voting rights of all Ohioans, allowing our bipartisan elections officials to continue preparing for a successful November election.

    "We filed this appeal to protect all Ohio voters from illegal challenges and barriers that unfairly silence the votes of some to the advantage of others," she said.

    The state Republican Party contends that there is widespread voter fraud in Ohio -- a crucial battleground state for the 2008 presidential election -- and that Brunner "turned off" its process for verifying voter registrations while allowing Ohioans to cast ballots on the same day they registered.

    In reaction to the high court's decision state GOP Chairman Bob Bennett said in a statement, "This decision was made on a technicality, not on the merits of the case."

    "We are again calling on the Secretary of State to comply with federal law by providing clear instructions to election administrators on how to handle questionable voter registration forms," Bennett said.

    Bennett had accused Brunner of concealing fraudulent voter registrations in hopes of swinging the state to Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate.

    Brunner's office has acknowledged that preliminary information provided by about 200,000 registered voters may not match up. Brunner said Tuesday she had prepared for the appeals court's "possible adverse decision" ahead of time by announcing plans to "further improve the statewide voter registration database."

    The appeals court opinion called Ohio's current system "virtually useless" and said it does "nothing to address the anti-fraud objective."

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...ing/index.html

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Lompoc, Ca
    Posts
    8,430
    Thanks
    1,286
    Thanked 1,472 Times in 1,090 Posts
    Groans
    475
    Groaned 278 Times in 249 Posts

    Default

    seems the gop waited too long

    if they had filed earlier and given election officials enough time to sort things out they would have prevailed
    I pledge allegiance to the constitution of the United States of America as amended by the legislative and executive branches and interpreted by the Supreme Court

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America

Similar Threads

  1. Soc for supreme court justice!
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-08-2008, 12:17 PM
  2. The supreme court today
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 02:53 AM
  3. Supreme Court strikes down DC gun ban
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 11:56 AM
  4. Bill Clinton on Supreme Court?
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 08:17 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-03-2006, 06:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •