Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Where does wealth come from?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default Where does wealth come from?

    I just heard our new political leader, "Joe the P", say to a news crew outside his driveway that "wealth doesn't come from the bottom up" (along with a few other things that kind of gave away his agenda).

    It got me thinking...where does it come from? Let's take the case of Joe the P.....what is more likely to make him wealthy?

    A CEO who makes several millions dollars a year getting a tax break?

    or

    Lifting the circumstances of millions of middle class families, though tax breaks, investment in education & cheaper energy costs.

    It seems to me, that when the latter happens, many more people will renovate their bathrooms, renovate their kitchens & keep plumbers like Joe the P. busy with as much work as they can handle.

    I'm getting a funny feeling about this election; it feels like people are going to be easily fooled into voting against their self-interest, once again.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post

    I'm getting a funny feeling about this election; it feels like people are going to be easily fooled into voting against their self-interest, once again.
    I would agree. It looks very likely that we will have one party in control of all three houses. Historically that has been a disaster for our country.

    Very good point Lorax.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    I just heard our new political leader, "Joe the P", say to a news crew outside his driveway that "wealth doesn't come from the bottom up" (along with a few other things that kind of gave away his agenda).

    It got me thinking...where does it come from? Let's take the case of Joe the P.....what is more likely to make him wealthy?

    A CEO who makes several millions dollars a year getting a tax break?

    or

    Lifting the circumstances of millions of middle class families, though tax breaks, investment in education & cheaper energy costs.

    It seems to me, that when the latter happens, many more people will renovate their bathrooms, renovate their kitchens & keep plumbers like Joe the P. busy with as much work as they can handle.

    I'm getting a funny feeling about this election; it feels like people are going to be easily fooled into voting against their self-interest, once again.
    as I have said I think the trillion would have a more positicve impact on our economy by giving it to propel and restricting it to pay of debts.

    Remember we are 2/3 comsumer spending driven, if people have less or no debt.....
    Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion.
    Proving tax cuts work!

    Bush asked for and signed for the TARP money.
    The Republican senate leader backed Bush on this.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    I would agree. It looks very likely that we will have one party in control of all three houses. Historically that has been a disaster for our country.

    Very good point Lorax.
    McCain = Bush.

    McBush.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    I just heard our new political leader, "Joe the P", say to a news crew outside his driveway that "wealth doesn't come from the bottom up" (along with a few other things that kind of gave away his agenda).

    It got me thinking...where does it come from? Let's take the case of Joe the P.....what is more likely to make him wealthy?

    A CEO who makes several millions dollars a year getting a tax break?

    or

    Lifting the circumstances of millions of middle class families, though tax breaks, investment in education & cheaper energy costs.

    It seems to me, that when the latter happens, many more people will renovate their bathrooms, renovate their kitchens & keep plumbers like Joe the P. busy with as much work as they can handle.

    I'm getting a funny feeling about this election; it feels like people are going to be easily fooled into voting against their self-interest, once again.
    Maybe my view is skewered by where I'm from. I worked in the Silicon Valley for awhile and it is a very entrepreneurial area. A lot of the start-up companies are funded by venture capital. That venture capital money often comes from well to do individuals. I belief it is important to financially incentivize these type of people to invest as that's where our future Googles and E-Bay's often come from. And by financially incentivize I mean by not placing punitive tax measures on them.

    I just got called into an office I'll continue after.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Maybe my view is skewered by where I'm from. I worked in the Silicon Valley for awhile and it is a very entrepreneurial area. A lot of the start-up companies are funded by venture capital. That venture capital money often comes from well to do individuals. I belief it is important to financially incentivize these type of people to invest as that's where our future Googles and E-Bay's often come from. And by financially incentivize I mean by not placing punitive tax measures on them.

    I just got called into an office I'll continue after.
    they have the money, that is wealth. They pay taxes on income not existing wealth. why I speak of distribution of income.
    Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion.
    Proving tax cuts work!

    Bush asked for and signed for the TARP money.
    The Republican senate leader backed Bush on this.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    24,050
    Thanks
    765
    Thanked 1,120 Times in 940 Posts
    Groans
    818
    Groaned 1,063 Times in 960 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    I just heard our new political leader, "Joe the P", say to a news crew outside his driveway that "wealth doesn't come from the bottom up" (along with a few other things that kind of gave away his agenda).

    It got me thinking...where does it come from? Let's take the case of Joe the P.....what is more likely to make him wealthy?

    A CEO who makes several millions dollars a year getting a tax break?

    or

    Lifting the circumstances of millions of middle class families, though tax breaks, investment in education & cheaper energy costs.

    It seems to me, that when the latter happens, many more people will renovate their bathrooms, renovate their kitchens & keep plumbers like Joe the P. busy with as much work as they can handle.

    I'm getting a funny feeling about this election; it feels like people are going to be easily fooled into voting against their self-interest, once again.
    That 'funny feeling' probably means you need to potty, Onezies!

    Let me explain it to you... when you tax the fuck out of corporations (CEO's) and "the wealthy", they are not just going to say... Oh, here Obama, take my money and redistribute it! Nope... they are going to pull it out of the market, and send it overseas where it is safe... they are going to start laying off workers and not hiring new ones, because they will not be 'growing' any more in business. This means, not only are you going to not have their money to spend, but millions of middle class Americans who depended on those jobs, aren't going to have money to spend either. In your foolish attempt to take something that doesn't belong to you, and give it to people who aren't entitled to it, you destroy the economy and the tax base, and bankrupt the whole system... then the whole shebang goes right down the tubes, as you dwell in your socialist bureaucracy, scratching your little wooden pinhead, wondering why it didn't work like you planned.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    New phrase neocon poopheads.
    Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion.
    Proving tax cuts work!

    Bush asked for and signed for the TARP money.
    The Republican senate leader backed Bush on this.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,441
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
    That 'funny feeling' probably means you need to potty, Onezies!

    Let me explain it to you... when you tax the fuck out of corporations (CEO's) and "the wealthy", they are not just going to say... Oh, here Obama, take my money and redistribute it! Nope... they are going to pull it out of the market, and send it overseas where it is safe... they are going to start laying off workers and not hiring new ones, because they will not be 'growing' any more in business. This means, not only are you going to not have their money to spend, but millions of middle class Americans who depended on those jobs, aren't going to have money to spend either. In your foolish attempt to take something that doesn't belong to you, and give it to people who aren't entitled to it, you destroy the economy and the tax base, and bankrupt the whole system... then the whole shebang goes right down the tubes, as you dwell in your socialist bureaucracy, scratching your little wooden pinhead, wondering why it didn't work like you planned.
    Your view, as always, is painfully simplistic.

    Tell me, Dix - has "trickle down" worked?

    And don't give me the Reagan years, because it took an unprecedented boom in the '90's to dig out of the deficit hole those years created.

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    You mean "Voodo Economics" as Bush I put it ?

    The president that pleaded with us to buy stuff on credit to help the economy ?
    Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion.
    Proving tax cuts work!

    Bush asked for and signed for the TARP money.
    The Republican senate leader backed Bush on this.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lakewood, WA.
    Posts
    301
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    And what good is all those greenbacks in a foreign country when our new printed currency will be redbacks?
    Geroge W. Bush is a false Christian, yet became a 2 term president. Mike Huckubee is a true Christian, yet has been ignored.

    Jesus was a Socialist, therefore, so am I!

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    24,050
    Thanks
    765
    Thanked 1,120 Times in 940 Posts
    Groans
    818
    Groaned 1,063 Times in 960 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uscitizen View Post
    they have the money, that is wealth. They pay taxes on income not existing wealth. why I speak of distribution of income.
    That being the case, where is the incentive to make more money? If I am rich, why the hell do I want to make more money, if most of it will end up being "redistributed" through your socialist policy of taxing me to death? Why would I be inclined to build a factory here in America, when my profits are going to be taxed out the ass, and I know I could build the same company in another country, with cheaper labor and less tax burden? I keep telling you idiots, "Rich People" didn't get to be that way by being STUPID! You seem to think they are just going to keep doing business as usual and let Obama take their earnings, and that isn't going to happen in the real world. One of the biggest problems you morons have is, you don't consider human behaviors... you assume everything just remains static... all the money and investments we've seen gained the past 10-20 years will just continue on the next 10-20 years, and nothing will change, but it will change... drastically! It's why you can't grasp the concept of lowering taxes to increase revenue... you don't understand it... in your pinhead way of thinking, RAISING the tax will bring in more revenues, but it doesn't, and hasn't ever! It's because of the human factor, because people find ways to protect their assets and don't invest when you tax the fuck out of them... but when you lower the taxes and restrictions, give them incentives to invest... they do... and the result is more jobs and greater tax revenues... happens every time it's been tried.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    dixie don't forget that companies will often just pass the raised taxes off onto the consumer by raising prices on their goods...


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    My shanty
    Posts
    52,839
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
    That being the case, where is the incentive to make more money? If I am rich, why the hell do I want to make more money, if most of it will end up being "redistributed" through your socialist policy of taxing me to death? Why would I be inclined to build a factory here in America, when my profits are going to be taxed out the ass, and I know I could build the same company in another country, with cheaper labor and less tax burden? I keep telling you idiots, "Rich People" didn't get to be that way by being STUPID! You seem to think they are just going to keep doing business as usual and let Obama take their earnings, and that isn't going to happen in the real world. One of the biggest problems you morons have is, you don't consider human behaviors... you assume everything just remains static... all the money and investments we've seen gained the past 10-20 years will just continue on the next 10-20 years, and nothing will change, but it will change... drastically! It's why you can't grasp the concept of lowering taxes to increase revenue... you don't understand it... in your pinhead way of thinking, RAISING the tax will bring in more revenues, but it doesn't, and hasn't ever! It's because of the human factor, because people find ways to protect their assets and don't invest when you tax the fuck out of them... but when you lower the taxes and restrictions, give them incentives to invest... they do... and the result is more jobs and greater tax revenues... happens every time it's been tried.
    the incentive is that you still make more money, just not quite as much.

    also I still support tax breaks for longer term investments.
    but the day and short term trading should be taxed at a higher rate.
    Gambling should not be rewarded at a higher rate than true investment.
    Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion.
    Proving tax cuts work!

    Bush asked for and signed for the TARP money.
    The Republican senate leader backed Bush on this.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,841
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grind View Post
    dixie don't forget that companies will often just pass the raised taxes off onto the consumer by raising prices on their goods...
    The market sets the prices of goods. Arbitrarily raising prices just means they'll sell less and miss the pique price/quantity mark and lose money because of it.

Similar Threads

  1. How Much of Your Wealth Should be Spread Around?
    By Dixie - In Memoriam in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 10-31-2008, 07:06 AM
  2. Redistribution of Wealth Experiment
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 05:55 AM
  3. Is He for Wealth Redistribution?
    By The Maverick in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 08:53 PM
  4. Disappearing now: $6 trillion in housing wealth
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-30-2008, 05:38 PM
  5. Wealth becoming more concentrated in the world
    By Topper in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-21-2007, 06:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •