60 percent think Biden won in post debate poll

[Doc Dutch]

You're not a neutral observer...you're a shitposter who wants to feel better about himself by posturing that you're "above it all" or whatever.

But you're not.

You're just down in the muck with everyone else, covered in it while pretending you aren't.

Centrists add nothing to the debate other than a smug sense of self-satisfaction.

But the reality is that you're just posturing. The posturing is covering for something else...something much deeper and more damaging within you.

If your takeaway from last night wasn't "Jesus fuck the President is crazy as shit and we have to do everything to get Biden elected so the threat is gone", then you're one of his supporters or you're so consumed with your own self-image that you're willing to embrace the fascist tendencies of normalizing brutality by bOtHsIdEs-ing everything.

All "both sides are the same" means is that you're too lazy or too stupid to recognize and acknowledge distinctions and differences, so everyone must lower their collective expectations of you accordingly.

Thanks for the nutjob rant. All you are doing is proving you are no better than Truth Detector, Teflon Don and the other RWNJs.

[LV426]

Thanks for the nutjob rant. All you are doing is proving you are no better than Truth Detector, Teflon Don and the other RWNJs.

You're a poseur...you don't believe in anything.

That makes it really easy to posture "neutrality".

But all that does is tell the world that you're too lazy or too dumb to reach any conclusions, and that simply putting yourself as the arbiter gives you a sense of power that you don't otherwise have. Specifically, the power to appear above it all by condemning those who condemn you.

But that's basically like a roach thinking it's doing something right because everyone is always trying to kill it.

So maybe your intent is to turn everyone off, that way you can posture victimhood because you get shit from all sides? Isn't that what you're doing here, sparky?

In the end, I doubt even your sincerity on centrism. I think it's all fake. I think you don't believe in anything. I think you come on places like JPP to feel better about yourself. Is it working? Do you feel better about yourself? Doesn't seem like it.

You seem like a very unhappy person. Unhappy that you don't get the respect or admiration you think your "brave" stance of standing for nothing entitles you to.

[jacksonsprat22]

You're a poseur...you don't believe in anything.

That makes it really easy to posture "neutrality".

But all that does is tell the world that you're too lazy or too dumb to reach any conclusions, and that simply putting yourself as the arbiter gives you a sense of power that you don't otherwise have. Specifically, the power to appear above it all by condemning those who condemn you.

But that's basically like a roach thinking it's doing something right because everyone is always trying to kill it.

So maybe your intent is to turn everyone off, that way you can posture victimhood because you get shit from all sides? Isn't that what you're doing here, sparky?

I gave up on that guy. A brain dead contrarian. Say it is Wednesday and he'll argue it's the day before Thursday.

[Doc Dutch]

You're a poseur...you don't believe in anything.

That makes it really easy to posture "neutrality".

But all that does is tell the world that you're too lazy or too dumb to reach any conclusions, and that simply putting yourself as the arbiter gives you a sense of power that you don't otherwise have. Specifically, the power to appear above it all by condemning those who condemn you.

But that's basically like a roach thinking it's doing something right because everyone is always trying to kill it.

So maybe your intent is to turn everyone off, that way you can posture victimhood because you get shit from all sides? Isn't that what you're doing here, sparky?

Son, all you are doing it proving yourself to be a maniac. Get some help before you start hurting people close to you.

[Micawber]

Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post

"Thanks for the nutjob rant. All you are doing is proving you are no better than Truth Detector, Teflon Don and the other RWNJs."


Nope, the fundamental righteousness of opposing the criminal traitor clown asshole is the distinction such that nobody can ever be compared like that.

If Jesus wrestled satan in pigslop. Doesn't make Jesus =satan.

Let me make this perfectly clear, WE ARE MORALLY SUPERIOR TO YOU.

[katzgar]

Trump was great.....he knows how deeply the game is rigged, he is going down fighting.... because that is what the Better People do.

God Bless Trump

You're assertion that asg is a loser is correct

[PoliTalker]

Hello Cypress,

In post debate poll
60% viewers thought Biden won
28% thought Fatso won

"Post-debate CNN poll: Six in 10 say Biden won the debate'

(CNN) Six in 10 debate watchers said former Vice President Joe Biden did the best job in Tuesday's debate, and just 28% say President Donald Trump did, according a CNN Poll of debate watchers conducted by SSRS

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...oll/index.html

I approve of this message.

Biden totally won.

[LV426]

I gave up on that guy. A brain dead contrarian. Say it is Wednesday and he'll argue it's the day before Thursday.

Contrarian is a good word for them.

That contrarianism is borne out of deep-seeded insecurities and a feeling of powerlessness.

That's why "centrists" like him bOtHsIdEs everything...they feel powerless in a debate for which they have no stakes or no knowledge, but want to feel the power of being some kind of independent arbiter of behavior or truth.

But you can't achieve that power if you don't stand for anything...which they don't.

[Micawber]

You're assertion that asg is a loser is correct

"going down" ah the sweet melodious chime of resignation.

[LV426]

Son, all you are doing it proving yourself to be a maniac. Get some help before you start hurting people close to you.

I'm not the posturing jackass here...you are.

You feel powerless in debates because you don't have any true convictions or beliefs...you're just a reactionary.

So you have to posture that you have the power to condemn best practices, behaviors, or policy (according to your subjective standard you mistake for objectivity) by feeling compelled to boil everything down to "both sides".

It's seriously lazy. Like, Trump-level lazy.

It's the JPP equivalent of "Very fine people on both sides".

[zymurgy]

Sociopathy. "Evil genius".

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/sociopathy
Sociopathy refers to a pattern of antisocial behaviors and attitudes, including manipulation, deceit, aggression, and a lack of empathy for others. Sociopathy is a non-diagnostic term, and it is not synonymous with "psychopathy," though the overlap leads to frequent confusion. Sociopaths may or may not break the law, but by exploiting and manipulating others, they violate the trust that the human enterprise runs on.

pretty common in leadership positions

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/08/the-...bad-thing.html

[RB 60]

Translation: You're right, Dutch. I shot my mouth off without knowing what I was talking about.

No. Not at all. You replied to one of my posts, I didn't innate this conversation.
You changed the subject, went right to Trump, I attempted to keep it on topic.
I did not shoot my mouth off. You don't like my response? It is what it is.

[Wolverine]

You're assertion that asg is a loser is correct

Dow is up 485 shouldn't you be giving Trump props!

[RB 60]

I don't think you know what "Majority" means. (See my sig)

It means

"Donald J. Trump won the Electoral College with 304 votes compared to 227 votes for Hillary Clinton."
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/president

[Jerome]

It means

"Donald J. Trump won the Electoral College with 304 votes compared to 227 votes for Hillary Clinton."
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/president

That's not a "majority" of human beings. That's the use of an archaic election system, adopted by no one else in the world, that has its roots in protecting the electoral power of slave states in the 18th century.