All religions are anti-science

[Into the Night]

Is that a fact?

You need not ask. A fact is simply an assumed predicate in a conversation. Nothing more. If you don't accept that predicate, it is not a fact. It is an argument. A fact is not a Universal Truth nor a proof.

[Into the Night]

Is that so?

I have to agree with you here. A lot of people single out Christianity. I would say most of them are liberals.

[Into the Night]

Name them, please.

Christianity. Buddhism. Shintoism. Hindi. The Church of God Denial. Islam. Shall I go on?

Since science isn't scientists, but simply a set of falsifiable theories, nothing in any of these religions says that one must reject falsifiable theories, or in other words, theories of science.

[Legion]

Christianity. Buddhism. Shintoism. Hindi. The Church of God Denial. Islam.

Kindly present verifiable evidence to substantiate your assertion that those religions aren't anti-science, please.

[Arks&sparka]

All religions are anti-science, so why do leftists only single out Christianity?

Select all that apply.

So no religious person believes in medicine or physics?

I doubt that claim

[Legion]

So no religious person believes in medicine or physics?

I doubt that claim

That's not even close to what I said, is it?

[Arks&sparka]

That's not even close to what I said, is it?

Right you said religion is anti science but medicine is science and there's religions who operate hospitals that practice medicine so I still doubt your claim.

You weren't specific about science so I can only assume you meant science in general. And you werent specific about what anti-science meant so I can only assume you meant they absolutely reject all science.

Perhaps in the future you should be less ambiguous.

[Geeko Sportivo]

All religions are anti-science, so why do leftists only single out Christianity?

Select all that apply.

Did you check first with your Log Cabin Republican Friends?

[Legion]

Right you said religion is anti science but medicine is science and there's religions who operate hospitals that practice medicine so I still doubt your claim.

You weren't specific about science so I can only assume you meant science in general. And you werent specific about what anti-science meant so I can only assume you meant they absolutely reject all science.

Perhaps in the future you should be less ambiguous.

I said that all religions are anti-science.

Not a single religion that I know of incorporates the scientific method in their theology, nor can any religious belief be validated scientifically. You're mistaking the actions of individuals and organizations with religions themselves.

[Legion]

Did you check first with your Log Cabin Republican Friends?

If I had any, I might have. Since I don't, that's your responsibility.

[Geeko Sportivo]

If I had any, I might have. Since I don't, that's your responsibility.

What? You don't don't like Log Cabin Republicans? LOL!

[Legion]

What? You don't don't like Log Cabin Republicans? LOL!

Is that what I said? I have nothing against your associates.

[Geeko Sportivo]

Is that what I said? I have nothing against your associates.

You Don't have to just hide in the closet anymore!

[Legion]

You Don't have to just hide in the closet anymore!

Was that the consensus at the last LCR meeting you attended?

[Arks&sparka]

I said that all religions are anti-science.

yes that's absolutely false. some religions operate hospitals that practice medicine. Unless you think medicine is Hocus pocus then there you have religions that aren't anti science.

Not a single religion that I know of incorporates the scientific method in their theology,

well that's kind of a stupid statement. Theology isn't science why would they incorporate that in to theology?

You should have said all theology is anti science and even then you'd be wrong for a theology to be anti science it must say science is incorrect and it doesn't.

nor can any religious belief be validated scientifically.

religious beliefs are things like forgiveness grace and mercy. To see those can't be scientifically validated is absurd. They don't posit any hypothesis. It's a code of conduct.

You're mistaking the actions of individuals and organizations with religions themselves.[/QUOTE]
Religions are organizations and individuals.