The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...

[Doc Dutch]

You want to live without governance you need to go off the grid someplace. There have always been rules for a responsible society. You can't buy a lot of things. It's always been funny how Sudafed is more regulated than guns. This assault ban was the law of the land and there was no tyranny swooping in like the NRA wants you to believe. The consequences were damn near unheard of school shootings and some cranky arms dealers not making money off them. The NRA is a shill for gun sales so of course, this wasn't OK. If your paranoid enough you need to carry an AR-15 you're paranoid enough to not take part in public society.

Another lie which takes us back to this:

Reason #1 to not vote Democrat: They cannot be trusted to tell the truth.


Your statement is a lie because I've never advocated living without governance. In fact, I've stated quite the opposite several times. The fact you are lying now puts you in the same boat with all other liars regardless of party.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

See bolded.

I am guessing you didn't follow the references.

Where is the evidence that Rittenhouse completed the necessary course to be in compliance? Since he was not from WI, what are the chances that he completed a course in WI?

[Geeko Sportivo]

Interesting that the three people shot by Rittenhouse, the 17 year-old all had serious criminal records.

Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse shot was seen by numerous people engaged in arson during the riot in question. Rosenbaum is a convicted sex offender.

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard. Cheong has numerous previous convictions for assault, threatening with a dangerous weapon, endangerment, domestic abuse (aka wife beater), etc.



Thug with a skateboard if you will.

His last was Giage "Lefty" Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz pulled a pistol and pointed it at Rittenhouse who then shot and wounded him. Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/202...g-like-felons/

This isn't a judgement about the validity of Rittenhouse's actions. It is just a note on who the people he shot were (I won't call them victims as two out of three clearly intended by their actions to seriously injure or kill Rittenhouse).

NONE OF THAT MATTERS- THE POLICE HAVE TO FOLLOW STANDARD POLICE PROCEDURES WHEN THEY ARE ARRESTING OR APPREHENDING SUSPECTS.

WHEN THEY DON'T, AND SOMEONE GETS SHOT, THEY GET ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED.

[Walt]

Self defense is not a crime, fuckwit... carrying a rifle is not a crime, fuckwit...

It depends on who you are, where you are carrying it, and what type of rifle. For instance, if you carried a rifle in Tokyo, or Singapore, you would be going to prison for a very long time.

The fact is that none of the exceptions to carrying a rifle were met by Rittenhouse, so he is almost certainly guilty of being a minor carrying a rifle.

[CFM]

NONE OF THAT MATTERS- THE POLICE HAVE TO FOLLOW STANDARD POLICE PROCEDURES WHEN THEY ARE ARRESTING OR APPREHENDING SUSPECTS.

WHEN THEY DON'T, AND SOMEONE GETS SHOT, THEY GET ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED.

The potential of some thug being violent always matters.

[CFM]

It depends on who you are, where you are carrying it, and what type of rifle. For instance, if you carried a rifle in Tokyo, or Singapore, you would be going to prison for a very long time.

The fact is that none of the exceptions to carrying a rifle were met by Rittenhouse, so he is almost certainly guilty of being a minor carrying a rifle.

How ironic that a gun hating pussy thinks he's knows anything about guns.

[Geeko Sportivo]

The potential of some thug being violent always matters.

It matters that policemen follow proper procedures. Why do you think he was prosecuted?

[CFM]

It matters that policemen follow proper procedures. Why do you think he was prosecuted?

I don't argue that. That doesn't have anything to do with considering a potential suspect's past actions.

With the circus that's going on now, all it takes is for a group of blacks to whine that black lives matter. You and I both know that if they truly cared about black lives, they'd be as concerned about all the shootings in places like Chicago not just when the shooter is a white cop.

[gfm7175]

I am guessing you didn't follow the references.

Nah, that's your issue.

Where is the evidence that Rittenhouse completed the necessary course to be in compliance? Since he was not from WI, what are the chances that he completed a course in WI?

He doesn't need to complete any course...

[gfm7175]

It depends on who you are, where you are carrying it, and what type of rifle. For instance, if you carried a rifle in Tokyo, or Singapore, you would be going to prison for a very long time.

This thread is about Wisconsin law, not Tokyo/Singapore law...

The fact is that none of the exceptions to carrying a rifle were met by Rittenhouse, so he is almost certainly guilty of being a minor carrying a rifle.

It was not illegal for him to carry that rifle... not in Wisconsin, anyway...

[Walt]

It was not illegal for him to carry that rifle... not in Wisconsin, anyway...

There is an arrest warrant based on it being illegal for Rittenhouse to carry a rifle in Wisconsin. That means there was "probable cause", which means more than likely it was illegal, and he did it.

[Sailor]

There are many issues that are subjective, but Grosskreutz having a valid concealed carry permit is not one of them. He is 100% legally allowed to carry a concealed handgun.

Yawn.

[gfm7175]

There is an arrest warrant based on it being illegal for Rittenhouse to carry a rifle in Wisconsin. That means there was "probable cause", which means more than likely it was illegal, and he did it.

It was perfectly legal for him to be carrying that rifle.

[Taichiliberal]

The people who run our legal system are now often seen coming after the good people and not the bad people.

Let me be very clear here: That is a huge motherfucking problem!

Black folk for DECADES have been complaining about police bias per unwarranted searches, questions, detainments and unnecessary arrests where a simple fine or ticket would suffice.

Folk like you just lump it all together with actual criminal arrests and searches, and poo-pooed such claims. Now that it's happening in the open media where it can't be denied, suddenly YOU see a problem. Whoop-dee-do. Now American can take a breather.

[Taichiliberal]

So nice I'll say it twice:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...17#post3922117