Can any JPP marxist explain why the democrats think we need more Justices?

[RB 60]

And some people here call everyone who supports Biden Marxist and Commie.

I wouldn't go that far, but they are pretty much as brain dead as Biden is...

[AProudLefty]

I wouldn't go that far, but they are pretty much as brain dead as Biden is...

LOL

[Charoite]

Marxism is a bottom tier old curmudgeons boogieman. I don't know of many liberals under 40 that even pay his ideas any relevance. Republicans just conflate everything that isn't their way in the box of boogiemen. It's funny that many of them don't even know what's what anymore. There's a barrel of these boogiemen and I bet most Republicans here can't even tell you what's different about them since they so conflated them into each other.

[RB 60]

I wouldn't go that far, but they are pretty much as brain dead as Biden is...

LOL

Case in point...

Marxism is a bottom tier old curmudgeons boogieman. I don't know of many liberals under 40 that even pay his ideas any relevance. Republicans just conflate everything that isn't their way in the box of boogiemen. It's funny that many of them don't even know what's what anymore. There's a barrel of these boogiemen and I bet most Republicans here can't even tell you what's different about them since they so conflated them into each other.

[AProudLefty]

Case in point...

What is wrong with her post? It's common for politicians to create boogiemen. Both sides do it.

[Lightbringer]

What is wrong with her post? It's common for politicians to create boogiemen. Both sides do it.

I think RB's problem was with the obvious fallacy in the first sentence.

[canceled.2021.3]

The Dems do not want more judges. It was offered by someone as a solution to Trump/Moscow stealing another seat. The Dems have no such policy and no such plan. You guys run around crying fire all that time. Just because someone suggests it does not make it any more than someone saying it..

That isn’t what leading democrat senators are saying

And how is a seat being stolen from you?

It presumes it was yours to begin with. Where are you getting this presumption that it is the democrats seat?

You don’t have the White House. You don’t have the Senate.

So how is anything being stolen. Be specific

[canceled.2021.3]

Can you name a single poster here who claims to be a Marxist? Maybe there are a few I just never noticed.

Can you name one who claims to be a fascist yet you make the accusation all the time.

It is going to take you a while to shake that one off

[AProudLefty]

I notice that Lesion is bad at argument. In order to destroy a claim, all one had to do is to provide a counter-example.

[katzgar]

We have had 9 Supreme Court Justices since 1911

Why the need now to add more? Is it because you won't get your way?

And how many more do you think we need?

2?

4?

6?

And if you think we need more Supreme Court Justices now, let's say Trump wins and the GOP wins the House and keeps the Senate do you want them to add more Justices and end the filibuster completely?

Think this through and do so without using the name Trump

simple, to offset your knuckle draggers

[Darth Omar]

Republicans have manipulated the system - within the rules - to ensure the court is more conservative.

Why should Dems do what they can - within the rules - do do the same for their side?

Sounds like a double standard there.

Here’s the problem with your thinking: the ideological bent of justices shouldn’t matter. Or at least it should be of minimal importance.

Why? Because the constitution says what it says and means what it means. Liberals go too far in looking for ‘hidden meanings’ or appealing to extra-constitutional things like ‘well, in this country they do this’ or whatever.

So, as a response and a reaction to that, conservatives try and appoint strict constitutionalists to the court in order to keep the liberal justices in check.

Roe v Wade was a textbook example of conjuring rights. After it passed ‘the abortion question’ became a litmus test for any nominee. SCOTUS has been made into a kind of ‘third legislative branch’—by the left.

So it’s hardly surprising that they want to expand it. In fact, it’s totally predictable.

[Iolo/Penderyn]

We have had 9 Supreme Court Justices since 1911

Why the need now to add more? Is it because you won't get your way?

And how many more do you think we need?

2?

4?

6?

And if you think we need more Supreme Court Justices now, let's say Trump wins and the GOP wins the House and keeps the Senate do you want them to add more Justices and end the filibuster completely?

Think this through and do so without using the name Trump

It's like 1945 in Germany: nazis fuck up judicial systems, see.

[Legion]

simple, to offset your knuckle draggers

Is this you outing yourself as a Marxist, old man?

[Legion]

It's like 1945 in Germany: nazis fuck up judicial systems, see.

Is that so?

Kindly supply the corroborating details, Taffy.

[StoneByStone]

Can you name one who claims to be a fascist yet you make the accusation all the time.

It is going to take you a while to shake that one off

Big difference. Many of the people here support and promote Fascism. So it's fair to call them Fascists.

Is there anyone here who wants to use government-enforced collective ownership in order to advance global Communism or even just nation-wide Communism in America?