Earl (09-20-2020)
Members banned from this thread: Hermes Thoth, PostmodernProphet, Truth Detector, CFM, countryboy, Bobb and Yakuda |
Didn't McConnell deny Merrick Garland a SCOTUS hearing by saying that there shouldn't be a SCOTUS pick in an election year? Yes, he did!
And before our resident tRump "worshippers" chime in to defend "Moscow Mitch", the comments he made about not having a SCOTUS pick if the Senate and WH were controlled by different parties, was a ridiculous "rehabilitation" attempt that McConnell made later when he realized the FULL ramifications of what he had said.
The bottom line is that McConnell knew that Merrick would be CONFIRMED and thus denied him his right to a hearing.
Funny how our "phony" Constitutional Conservatives have no problem with violations of "due process" when it serves their agenda.
Please leave your Trump 2024 signs in your yard. That way, my dog will know where to take a dump.
Earl (09-20-2020)
PoliTalker (09-20-2020)
"Not having a SCOTUS pick if the Senate and WH were controlled by different parties."
True statement.
Fill Ruth's seat...now.
If you love Socialism, emigrate to Venezuela...bring food.
If you believe filling Ruth's seat now is hardball, consider what the radical Democrats have already done with the rioting, looting, burning, assaults and murders in cities that Democrats control but will not stop.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Bookmarks