Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 160

Thread: The News as We Once Knew It Is Dead

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default The News as We Once Knew It Is Dead

    Article worth a read. By a highly intelligent person. Wonder who will try and refute it on here. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ad_144223.html


    The News as We Once Knew It Is Dead
    By Victor Davis Hanson

    n 2017, the liberal Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University found that 93 percent of CNN's coverage of the Trump administration was negative. The center found similarly negative Trump coverage at other major news outlets.

    The election year 2020 has only accelerated that asymmetrical bias -- to the point that major newspapers and network and cable news organizations are now fused with the Joe Biden campaign.

    Sometimes stories are covered only in terms of political agendas. Take COVID-19.

    The media assure us that the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic has been a disaster. But their conclusions are not supported by any evidence.

    In the United States, the coronavirus death rate per million people is similar to, or lower than, most major European countries except Germany

    When the virus was at its worst, before the partisan campaign of this election year heated up, the governors in our four largest states had only compliments for the Trump administration.

    Democrats Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gavin Newsom of California and Republicans Greg Abbott of Texas and Ron DeSantis of Florida effusively praised the administration's cooperation with their own frontline efforts.

    The most recent conclusions of impartial heads of federal agencies responsible for coordinating national and state policies are about the same.

    Dr. Deborah Birx (adviser to both the Obama and Trump administrations on responses to infectious diseases), Dr. Anthony Fauci (director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Dr. Scott Gottlieb (former head of the Food and Drug Administration) have not faulted the Trump administration's overall COVID-19 response. They attribute any shortcomings to initial global ignorance about the origins and nature of the epidemic, incompetence at the World Health Organization, or the initial inability of bureaucracies to produce easily available and reliable test kits.

    Prominent progressive Trump critics such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi criticized the necessary Trump travel ban, yet Pelosi told people there was no reason to cancel planned travel to San Francisco's Chinatown.

    However, the real warping of the news is not just a matter of slanting coverage, but deliberately not covering the news at all.

    In the last two weeks, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has achieved the most stunning breakthroughs in Middle Eastern diplomacy in over half a century.

    Countries once hostile to Israel, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, now formally recognize it. Other Arab nations may follow. Ancient existential enemies Kosovo and Serbia also agreed to normalize their relationship with Israel by signing economic agreements.

    Yet none of these historic events have drawn much media attention. All of them would have been canonized were they achievements of the Obama administration.

    In 2017, the media suggested that Trump's plans to get out of the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord, to confront Chinese mercantilism, to forge new alliances between Israel and moderate Arab regimes, to isolate an ascendant Iran, to close the southern border to illegal immigration, to jawbone NATO alliance members into honoring their defense expenditure commitments, and to destroy ISIS and weaken Hezbollah were all impossible, counterproductive or sheer madness.

    And now?

    An embargoed and bankrupt Iran is teetering on the brink. Its international terrorist appendages, including Hezbollah, are broke.

    China is increasingly being ostracized by much of the world.

    The U.S. has cut its carbon emissions, often at a rate superior to those nations still adhering to the Paris climate accord targets.

    Cross-border illegal immigration has been reduced, according to many metrics.

    ISIS was bombed into near dissolution. Moderate regimes in the Middle East are ascendant; radical cliques like Hamas and al-Qaeda are not.

    More NATO members are meeting their commitments. The alliance's aggregate defense investments are way up.

    Is any of that considered news? Not really.

    Instead, every three or four days the public is fed a series of fantasy "bombshells" much like the daily hysterias of the Robert Mueller investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump team and Russia -- a two-year, media-hyped dud.

    In recent weeks the media warned us that Trump was dismantling the Post Office to disrupt mail-in balloting.

    Trump, we are told, has decided never to concede his sure loss in November and might have to be forcibly removed, perhaps by the military.

    We read that Trump defiled the memory of fallen American soldiers in cemeteries abroad. We are lectured that Trump supposedly never took COVID-19 seriously.

    All of these stories were either demonstrably untrue, were supported only by anonymous sources, or were the sensationalism of authors hawking books.

    Yet such concocted melodramas will continue each week up to Election Day, while fundamental geostrategic shifts abroad brought about by American diplomacy will by intent go unnoticed.

    The news as we once understood it is dead.

    It has been replaced by the un-news: a political narrative created by partisans who believe the noble ends of destroying Trump justify any biased means necessary -- including destroying their own reputation and craft.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    If you get your news from television, you are not getting the news...

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Flash (09-19-2020)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    88,265
    Thanks
    145,659
    Thanked 82,492 Times in 52,722 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,657 Times in 4,376 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Fox is no different.

    I preferred the "good old days" where the talking heads related what was going on in the world, and left it up to the viewers what to make of it.

    RWers and Trump cultists have no bones to pick with mainstream media: the MSM are the ones who featured the Toadstool Nuremberg rallies night after night, and gave scant attention to the rest of the candidates. Even after Clinton was nominated, Trump got far more national news air time than she did.

    The writer of this article is right about CNN. We don't watch their broadcasts, but do read their non-political stories on their web site. They have made no bones at all about despising the Toadstool and don't try to hide their bias... hence why I only use it for non-political news stories.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    AProudLefty (09-19-2020), Doc Dutch (09-19-2020)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    20,422
    Thanks
    1,794
    Thanked 11,068 Times in 6,779 Posts
    Groans
    888
    Groaned 1,829 Times in 1,694 Posts

    Default

    The news is over.

    It's a quaint concept of a bygone era.

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Article worth a read. By a highly intelligent person. Wonder who will try and refute it on here. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ad_144223.html


    The News as We Once Knew It Is Dead
    By Victor Davis Hanson

    n 2017, the liberal Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University found that 93 percent of CNN's coverage of the Trump administration was negative. The center found similarly negative Trump coverage at other major news outlets.

    The election year 2020 has only accelerated that asymmetrical bias -- to the point that major newspapers and network and cable news organizations are now fused with the Joe Biden campaign.

    Sometimes stories are covered only in terms of political agendas. Take COVID-19.

    The media assure us that the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic has been a disaster. But their conclusions are not supported by any evidence.

    In the United States, the coronavirus death rate per million people is similar to, or lower than, most major European countries except Germany

    When the virus was at its worst, before the partisan campaign of this election year heated up, the governors in our four largest states had only compliments for the Trump administration.

    Democrats Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gavin Newsom of California and Republicans Greg Abbott of Texas and Ron DeSantis of Florida effusively praised the administration's cooperation with their own frontline efforts.

    The most recent conclusions of impartial heads of federal agencies responsible for coordinating national and state policies are about the same.

    Dr. Deborah Birx (adviser to both the Obama and Trump administrations on responses to infectious diseases), Dr. Anthony Fauci (director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Dr. Scott Gottlieb (former head of the Food and Drug Administration) have not faulted the Trump administration's overall COVID-19 response. They attribute any shortcomings to initial global ignorance about the origins and nature of the epidemic, incompetence at the World Health Organization, or the initial inability of bureaucracies to produce easily available and reliable test kits.

    Prominent progressive Trump critics such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi criticized the necessary Trump travel ban, yet Pelosi told people there was no reason to cancel planned travel to San Francisco's Chinatown.

    However, the real warping of the news is not just a matter of slanting coverage, but deliberately not covering the news at all.

    In the last two weeks, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has achieved the most stunning breakthroughs in Middle Eastern diplomacy in over half a century.

    Countries once hostile to Israel, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, now formally recognize it. Other Arab nations may follow. Ancient existential enemies Kosovo and Serbia also agreed to normalize their relationship with Israel by signing economic agreements.

    Yet none of these historic events have drawn much media attention. All of them would have been canonized were they achievements of the Obama administration.

    In 2017, the media suggested that Trump's plans to get out of the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord, to confront Chinese mercantilism, to forge new alliances between Israel and moderate Arab regimes, to isolate an ascendant Iran, to close the southern border to illegal immigration, to jawbone NATO alliance members into honoring their defense expenditure commitments, and to destroy ISIS and weaken Hezbollah were all impossible, counterproductive or sheer madness.

    And now?

    An embargoed and bankrupt Iran is teetering on the brink. Its international terrorist appendages, including Hezbollah, are broke.

    China is increasingly being ostracized by much of the world.

    The U.S. has cut its carbon emissions, often at a rate superior to those nations still adhering to the Paris climate accord targets.

    Cross-border illegal immigration has been reduced, according to many metrics.

    ISIS was bombed into near dissolution. Moderate regimes in the Middle East are ascendant; radical cliques like Hamas and al-Qaeda are not.

    More NATO members are meeting their commitments. The alliance's aggregate defense investments are way up.

    Is any of that considered news? Not really.

    Instead, every three or four days the public is fed a series of fantasy "bombshells" much like the daily hysterias of the Robert Mueller investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump team and Russia -- a two-year, media-hyped dud.

    In recent weeks the media warned us that Trump was dismantling the Post Office to disrupt mail-in balloting.

    Trump, we are told, has decided never to concede his sure loss in November and might have to be forcibly removed, perhaps by the military.

    We read that Trump defiled the memory of fallen American soldiers in cemeteries abroad. We are lectured that Trump supposedly never took COVID-19 seriously.

    All of these stories were either demonstrably untrue, were supported only by anonymous sources, or were the sensationalism of authors hawking books.

    Yet such concocted melodramas will continue each week up to Election Day, while fundamental geostrategic shifts abroad brought about by American diplomacy will by intent go unnoticed.

    The news as we once understood it is dead.

    It has been replaced by the un-news: a political narrative created by partisans who believe the noble ends of destroying Trump justify any biased means necessary -- including destroying their own reputation and craft.
    Aye, Cap'n.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,796
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 19,968 Times in 14,555 Posts
    Groans
    1,422
    Groaned 949 Times in 933 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Fox is no different.

    I preferred the "good old days" where the talking heads related what was going on in the world, and left it up to the viewers what to make of it.

    RWers and Trump cultists have no bones to pick with mainstream media: the MSM are the ones who featured the Toadstool Nuremberg rallies night after night, and gave scant attention to the rest of the candidates. Even after Clinton was nominated, Trump got far more national news air time than she did.

    The writer of this article is right about CNN. We don't watch their broadcasts, but do read their non-political stories on their web site. They have made no bones at all about despising the Toadstool and don't try to hide their bias... hence why I only use it for non-political news stories.
    According to the Harvard study quoted in the article Fox was the most balanced of the media outlets they studied.

    https://shorensteincenter.org/news-c...irst-100-days/

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ExpressLane For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (09-19-2020)

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    The Fourth Estate grew its cancer in 2000 and died in 2016.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,574
    Thanks
    46,725
    Thanked 68,572 Times in 51,893 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Article worth a read. By a highly intelligent person. Wonder who will try and refute it on here. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ad_144223.html


    The News as We Once Knew It Is Dead
    By Victor Davis Hanson
     


    n 2017, the liberal Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University found that 93 percent of CNN's coverage of the Trump administration was negative. The center found similarly negative Trump coverage at other major news outlets.

    The election year 2020 has only accelerated that asymmetrical bias -- to the point that major newspapers and network and cable news organizations are now fused with the Joe Biden campaign.

    Sometimes stories are covered only in terms of political agendas. Take COVID-19.

    The media assure us that the Trump administration's handling of the pandemic has been a disaster. But their conclusions are not supported by any evidence.

    In the United States, the coronavirus death rate per million people is similar to, or lower than, most major European countries except Germany

    When the virus was at its worst, before the partisan campaign of this election year heated up, the governors in our four largest states had only compliments for the Trump administration.

    Democrats Andrew Cuomo of New York and Gavin Newsom of California and Republicans Greg Abbott of Texas and Ron DeSantis of Florida effusively praised the administration's cooperation with their own frontline efforts.

    The most recent conclusions of impartial heads of federal agencies responsible for coordinating national and state policies are about the same.

    Dr. Deborah Birx (adviser to both the Obama and Trump administrations on responses to infectious diseases), Dr. Anthony Fauci (director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Dr. Scott Gottlieb (former head of the Food and Drug Administration) have not faulted the Trump administration's overall COVID-19 response. They attribute any shortcomings to initial global ignorance about the origins and nature of the epidemic, incompetence at the World Health Organization, or the initial inability of bureaucracies to produce easily available and reliable test kits.

    Prominent progressive Trump critics such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi criticized the necessary Trump travel ban, yet Pelosi told people there was no reason to cancel planned travel to San Francisco's Chinatown.

    However, the real warping of the news is not just a matter of slanting coverage, but deliberately not covering the news at all.

    In the last two weeks, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has achieved the most stunning breakthroughs in Middle Eastern diplomacy in over half a century.

    Countries once hostile to Israel, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, now formally recognize it. Other Arab nations may follow. Ancient existential enemies Kosovo and Serbia also agreed to normalize their relationship with Israel by signing economic agreements.

    Yet none of these historic events have drawn much media attention. All of them would have been canonized were they achievements of the Obama administration.

    In 2017, the media suggested that Trump's plans to get out of the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord, to confront Chinese mercantilism, to forge new alliances between Israel and moderate Arab regimes, to isolate an ascendant Iran, to close the southern border to illegal immigration, to jawbone NATO alliance members into honoring their defense expenditure commitments, and to destroy ISIS and weaken Hezbollah were all impossible, counterproductive or sheer madness.

    And now?

    An embargoed and bankrupt Iran is teetering on the brink. Its international terrorist appendages, including Hezbollah, are broke.

    China is increasingly being ostracized by much of the world.

    The U.S. has cut its carbon emissions, often at a rate superior to those nations still adhering to the Paris climate accord targets.

    Cross-border illegal immigration has been reduced, according to many metrics.

    ISIS was bombed into near dissolution. Moderate regimes in the Middle East are ascendant; radical cliques like Hamas and al-Qaeda are not.

    More NATO members are meeting their commitments. The alliance's aggregate defense investments are way up.

    Is any of that considered news? Not really.

    Instead, every three or four days the public is fed a series of fantasy "bombshells" much like the daily hysterias of the Robert Mueller investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump team and Russia -- a two-year, media-hyped dud.

    In recent weeks the media warned us that Trump was dismantling the Post Office to disrupt mail-in balloting.

    Trump, we are told, has decided never to concede his sure loss in November and might have to be forcibly removed, perhaps by the military.

    We read that Trump defiled the memory of fallen American soldiers in cemeteries abroad. We are lectured that Trump supposedly never took COVID-19 seriously.

    All of these stories were either demonstrably untrue, were supported only by anonymous sources, or were the sensationalism of authors hawking books.

    Yet such concocted melodramas will continue each week up to Election Day, while fundamental geostrategic shifts abroad brought about by American diplomacy will by intent go unnoticed.

    The news as we once understood it is dead.

    It has been replaced by the un-news: a political narrative created by partisans who believe the noble ends of destroying Trump justify any biased means necessary -- including destroying their own reputation and craft.
    Hanson, who is a smart and educated guy, but he's as guilty as CNN.

    I'm agreed with him that "news" is biased; it's biased to make money off of viewers through advertising. Intelligent, critically-thinking people can pick out the facts from the bullshit...and there's a lot of bullshit on all the cable news channels, including Fox which Victor neglected to mention in his complaint.

    He also wrote this: "We read that Trump defiled the memory of fallen American soldiers in cemeteries abroad. We are lectured that Trump supposedly never took COVID-19 seriously.

    All of these stories were either demonstrably untrue, were supported only by anonymous sources, or were the sensationalism of authors hawking books
    " which itself is demonstrably untrue as Victor, an author himself hawking books, knows.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,574
    Thanks
    46,725
    Thanked 68,572 Times in 51,893 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Fox is no different.

    I preferred the "good old days" where the talking heads related what was going on in the world, and left it up to the viewers what to make of it.

    RWers and Trump cultists have no bones to pick with mainstream media: the MSM are the ones who featured the Toadstool Nuremberg rallies night after night, and gave scant attention to the rest of the candidates. Even after Clinton was nominated, Trump got far more national news air time than she did.

    The writer of this article is right about CNN. We don't watch their broadcasts, but do read their non-political stories on their web site. They have made no bones at all about despising the Toadstool and don't try to hide their bias... hence why I only use it for non-political news stories.
    Agreed on Fox. It's all about the money for all the cable news channels. Fox has their niche, CNN has theirs...which they are trying to share with MSNBC and both losing money to Fox. If a fourth news channel which is hard right like Fox grew as large as CNN and MSNBC, it'd probably even everything out.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,574
    Thanks
    46,725
    Thanked 68,572 Times in 51,893 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    According to the Harvard study quoted in the article Fox was the most balanced of the media outlets they studied.

    https://shorensteincenter.org/news-c...irst-100-days/
    That's not what it says, slick. There's balanced media and then there's "Fox was the only news outlet in the study that came close to giving Trump positive coverage overall, however, there was variation in the tone of Fox’s coverage depending on the topic.

    It's like saying US newspapers are biased against Putin but RT is balanced media because they report more positive things about Putin like Putin fishing, Putin riding bareback and Putin shooting rifles.

    The key, of course, isn't what newspaper, magazine or cable news a person watches, but that the person is able to use critical thinking to analyze the report.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Doc Dutch For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (09-19-2020)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,574
    Thanks
    46,725
    Thanked 68,572 Times in 51,893 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    If you get your news from television, you are not getting the news...
    Every hour it's about 5 minutes of news, 10 minutes of commercials and 45 minutes of bullshit opinions. I like a news mix channel which has all the CNN, Fox, MSNBC and BBC in quarters on the screen. It's interesting to see what they choose to cover and what they do not.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    We read that Trump defiled the memory of fallen American soldiers in cemeteries abroad.
    anonymous lies treated as gospel by Fake News

    We are lectured that Trump supposedly never took COVID-19 seriously.
    travel bans that Biden called "xenophobic racism" is taking COVI seriously

    Countries once hostile to Israel, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, now formally recognize it. Other Arab nations may follow. Ancient existential enemies Kosovo and Serbia also agreed to normalize their relationship with Israel by signing economic agreements.

    Yet none of these historic events have drawn much media attention. All of them would have been canonized were they achievements of the Obama administration.
    the coverage is scant to non-existent and "what about the Palestinians" -crap.

    Kerry was so far afield he said peace without solving the Palestinian was "impossible".
    Kerry is an idiot

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (09-19-2020), Stretch (09-19-2020)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    The writer of this article is right about CNN. We don't watch their broadcasts, but do read their non-political stories on their web site. They have made no bones at all about despising the Toadstool and don't try to hide their bias... hence why I only use it for non-political news stories.

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    >If you like your narrative, you can keep your narrative

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    It has been replaced by the un-news: a political narrative created by partisans who believe the noble ends of destroying Trump justify any biased means necessary -- including destroying their own reputation and craft.
    exactly what the NYTimes let out of the bag..

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/b...candidate.html
    If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional.

Similar Threads

  1. APP - Why Fox News is dead to me
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2018, 11:58 AM
  2. when fox us dead and all citizens get real news
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-24-2018, 12:06 PM
  3. 'That's too bad': Trump response to news 10 sailors could be dead is condemned
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-2017, 05:44 AM
  4. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-02-2017, 04:58 PM
  5. Irony is Dead - Fox News [sic]
    By ib1yysguy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 09-24-2009, 05:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •