Lefties attack Trump's scotus pick

[gfm7175]

That's why I want mitch to ram this through. Lefties have no regard for civics, and they wouldn't hesitate to ram a pick through if the shoe was on the other foot.

Ram it through because if you don't, you don't get it, and either way the lefties are going to expand the size of the court when they take over and pack it with libs anyway...

[Evmetro]

Ram it through because if you don't, you don't get it, and either way the lefties are going to expand the size of the court when they take over and pack it with libs anyway...

indeed.

[Yakuda]

According to Trump and right wing logic, Trump has no right to make the pick, They made it all very clear during Garland. We should respect the Republican's well thought out positions. No Supreme seat should be considered during a the last year of an administration. You rights all brayed that for all to hear. They said it, so we assume they meant it. Otherwise we have to believe the arguments during Garland were all lies. But no matter how you slice it, the Repubs are being liars and hypocrites.

Do you have proof this is the last year of trump's presidency?

[Doc Dutch]

Do you have proof this is the last year of trump's presidency?

Unless Trump dies of Trump disease, his last year of presidency will be 2021.....although there is a slim chance Trump will bail sometime after November 4th if he loses.

[Truth Detector]

Who cares who he picked. The standard that was given last time was not in an election year. Is it time to admit your side is just phony, contemptuous, and full of shit?

There is only ONE standard you whiny, uneducated, lying leftist loon; it's called the CONSTITUTION. Read it some time simpleton. Assuming of course you have ANY reading comprehension skills.

[Truth Detector]

According to Trump and right wing logic, Trump has no right to make the pick, They made it all very clear during Garland.

The CONSTITUTION; read it you clueless, whiny leftist dullard on steroids.

[gfm7175]

Who cares who he picked. The standard that was given last time was not in an election year.

... and that "standard" was based on the Biden Rule of 1992... This is all irrelevant anyway, as a President has the constitutional power to nominate and appoint SC justices during the FULL LENGTH of his term... It is still Trump's term, dummy...

Is it time to admit your side is just phony, contemptuous, and full of shit?

What is the difference between Mitch and the Senate giving Garland a hearing (and rejecting him) or just saving the time/hassle and denying the hearing at the outset, as he did? The Senate is not required to consent to any particular justice...

All of this comparison between 2016 and 2020 and 1992 is just irrelevant whiny bullshit anyway... In 2016, Obama had the power to nominate and appoint Garland, and the Senate had advisory and consent powers regarding the confirmation of Garland. Obama nominated, and the Senate did not consent... it is as simple as that. In 2020, Trump likewise has the power to nominate and appoint [insert SC justice here], and the Senate has advisory and consent powers regarding his choice. NOTHING is different between 2016, 2020, and 1992 besides which party had control over the Presidency/Senate at the time...

[Truth Detector]

We need Cruz in the Senate. Remember what happened when Sessions left to be AG? That was an unmitigated disaster, on all fronts.

Agreed; great point.

[Truth Detector]

Oh, they’ll act like Trumpublicans did with Harris, got ya.

[Yakuda]

Unless Trump dies of Trump disease, his last year of presidency will be 2021.....although there is a slim chance Trump will bail sometime after November 4th if he loses.

I asked for proof not your opinion but thank you for sharing. You sound ignorant when you use the term trump disese. I have heard leftists say trump has killed people but just like your response here, when asked to provide proof you guys never do. So you say ignorant things and then wonder why people treat you like you're ignorant.

[Legion]

In anticipation of Trump's upcoming announcement of who he will nominate to the Supreme Court, the Democrats have posted a nationwide job listing for believable accusers to tarnish the reputation of whoever Trump nominates.

The best candidates from all applicants will be invited to a casting call in D.C. to show off their "believable accusation" ability.

"We know that whoever Trump nominates will be an evil, mean, bad person," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. "That's just the kind of man Trump is. He hangs around evil, mean, bad people and he nominates them too. To prove this and save our democracy, we are hiring several believable witnesses to accuse Trump's nominee of whatever they probably did."

Listings have been purchased on ZipRecruiter, Monster, LinkedIn, and Craigslist.

Interested candidates will have just a few days to submit their applications before the Senate hearing.

At the casting call, they will be judged on their ability to cry on command while telling a horrific story of abuse on camera.

"We need brave patriots to step up and save our country by destroying the life of this nominee," said Nancy Pelosi before pausing awkwardly to add "um... Good morning! Sunday morning!"



https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-post-job-listing-for-supreme-court-nominee-accusers/?utm_content=buffer97a7c&utm_medium=social&utm_sou rce=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[Truth Detector]

Depends upon who he nominates, but they will be challenged, I'd wage on abortion, defending Trump, and civil rights

And the attack will start when Mitch attempts to ram in thru, actually, they already have given Mitch didn't wait till the lady was in the grave before declaring his intentions

Correction to the bolded; the whining, lying and bitching will start the minute Mitch CONSTITUTIONALLY begins the confirmation process.

FACT: Democrats have ZERO power to stop the CONSTITUTIONAL process from going through.

FACT: Democrats will act like angry, hate filled triggered loons trying to burn down their own house.

[PostmodernProphet]

Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
Is there any righty here who will say he agrees that it is wrong for Trump to make a choice because of the arguments against Garland?. Any of you at all?

it would be wrong for us to make stupid statements like the lib'ruls have done.......

[Truth Detector]

Sorry, I’m not opening some unofficial site. Do you have the official release by the White House and not some opinion piece?

Translation: Phantasmal prefers to remain an ignorant dumbass.

[PostmodernProphet]

What does that mean??

isn't the announcement that only black women would be considered, an admission of a racially discriminating criteria for qualification?......