Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Slow Joe in 2016: no delay; nominate and vote immediately

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Slow Joe in 2016: no delay; nominate and vote immediately


    In my 36-year tenure in the United States Senate — nearly half of it as chairman or ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee — I presided or helped preside over nine nominees to the Supreme Court, from both Republican and Democratic presidents. That’s more than anyone else alive today.

    In every instance we adhered to the process explicitly laid out in the Constitution: The president has the constitutional duty to nominate; the Senate has the constitutional obligation to provide advice and consent. It is written plainly in the Constitution that both presidents and senators swear an oath to uphold and defend.

    That’s why I was so surprised and saddened to see Republican leaders tell President Obama and me that they would not even consider a Supreme Court nominee this year. No meetings. No hearings. No votes. Nothing. It is an unprecedented act of obstruction. And it risks a stain on the legacy of all those complicit in carrying out this plan. I would ask my friends and colleagues — and all those who love the Senate — to think long and hard before going down this road.

    Some have taken comments I made in 1992 to mean that I supported the same kind of obstructionist position as a senator. But that reading distorts the broader meaning of the speech I gave from the Senate floor that year.

    It was late June, and at the time there was much speculation that a sitting justice would retire, leaving President George H.W. Bush to appoint a successor in the final months of his first term.

    We had been through several highly contentious Supreme Court confirmation hearings during my tenure, and I feared that a nomination at that late date, just a few weeks before the presidential conventions, would create immense political acrimony. So I called on the president to wait until after the election to submit a nomination if a sitting justice were to create a vacancy by retiring before November. And if the president declined to do that, I recommended that the Judiciary Committee not hold hearings “until after the political campaign season is over.”

    Those brief statements were part of a much more extensive speech that reviewed the history of Supreme Court nomination fights during election years. My purpose was not to obstruct, but to call for two important goals: restoring a more consultative process between the White House and the Senate in filling Supreme Court vacancies, and encouraging the nomination of a consensus candidate who could lower the partisan temperature in the country.

    It is the same view I hold today.

    Throughout that speech, and throughout my career, I’ve argued that the Senate has an important role to play. This involves the president’s seeking advice from its leaders before making a nomination — as President Obama has done and will continue to do — and the Senate’s examining candidates before deciding whether to consent to their appointments.

    Under my chairmanship, every Supreme Court nominee was given a hearing and a vote in the Judiciary Committee. And I made sure every nominee was given a full vote on the floor of the Senate, even those whose initial vote in the Judiciary Committee had failed, and even those whom I opposed. Only those who withdrew did not get floor votes. This position earned me the anger of my own party. But I believed strongly that the Constitution, clearly and plainly, calls for all 100 senators to advise and consent on nominees — not just the handful on the Judiciary Committee.

    As a senator, I zealously guarded the rights of the Senate. As vice president, I hold the same view. But the framers also intended for the president to fulfill a clear constitutional responsibility. President Obama will do that by putting forth a nominee who will be eminently qualified, who recognizes the limits of the judiciary, who is fair-minded and who has an unimpeachable record. The Senate will need to fulfill its constitutional responsibility by considering, debating and voting on that nominee.

    I know there is an argument that no nominee should be voted on in the last year of a presidency. But there is nothing in the Constitution — or our history — to support this view. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was confirmed in the last year of Ronald Reagan’s second term. I know. I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee at the time. And we promptly gave him a hearing, a vote in committee and a full vote on the floor.

    As I write this, nearly all Republican senators have said that they will refuse to consider any nominee — sight unseen. At a time when we need to reduce the gridlock in our politics, this would extend Congress’s dysfunction to the Supreme Court — preventing it from functioning as our founders intended for a year and possibly longer.

    In my 1992 speech, I noted that in the five cases in which justices were confirmed in the summer of an election year, all five were filling vacancies that had arisen before the summer began. That is the case now. We still have time to proceed with hearings and a vote before we reach the summer conventions and fall campaign.

    I hope that Republican leaders will take a step back and think about what they are doing. I hope they will think about the oaths they have taken. I hope they will think about their responsibility to the voters of this nation. And I hope they will think about their role in upholding the integrity of the United States Senate.

    If they love the Senate as much as I do, they need to act.


    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/opinion/joe-biden-the-senates-duty-to-advise-and-consent.html
    Last edited by Legion; 09-19-2020 at 09:33 AM.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Slow Joe in 1992: delay until after the election

    As a senator in 1992, the superannuated former vice president argued that President George Bush should delay filling a Supreme Court vacancy.




    HIS POSITION SEEMS TO CHANGE BASED ON WHICH PARTY THE PRESIDENT BELONGS TO

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default



    SLOW JOE SAID GO! GO! GO!


    "I know there is an argument that no nominee should be voted on in the last year of a presidency.

    But there is nothing in the Constitution — or our history — to support this view.

    Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was confirmed in the last year of Ronald Reagan’s second term.

    I know. I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee at the time. And we promptly gave him a hearing, a vote in committee and a full vote on the floor.

    I hope that Republican leaders will take a step back and think about what they are doing. I hope they will think about the oaths they have taken. I hope they will think about their responsibility to the voters of this nation. And I hope they will think about their role in upholding the integrity of the United States Senate.

    If they love the Senate as much as I do, they need to act".


    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/opinion/joe-biden-the-senates-duty-to-advise-and-consent.html

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    93,491
    Thanks
    107,506
    Thanked 21,206 Times in 17,718 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,922 Times in 2,664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Chuck Schumer: Then and Now
    Mayor de Blasio on March 5th:
    Coronavirus fears shouldn’t keep New Yorkers off subways


    Cuomo on March 18th:
    “That is not going to happen, shelter in place, for New York City. I wouldn’t approve shelter in place.”



  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    93,491
    Thanks
    107,506
    Thanked 21,206 Times in 17,718 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,922 Times in 2,664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Joe Biden forgets what Joe Biden once said about election year SCOTUS nominations
    Mayor de Blasio on March 5th:
    Coronavirus fears shouldn’t keep New Yorkers off subways


    Cuomo on March 18th:
    “That is not going to happen, shelter in place, for New York City. I wouldn’t approve shelter in place.”



  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    93,491
    Thanks
    107,506
    Thanked 21,206 Times in 17,718 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,922 Times in 2,664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Fiery Joe Biden Says 'There Is No Biden Rule,' 'It's Frankly Ridiculous'
    Mayor de Blasio on March 5th:
    Coronavirus fears shouldn’t keep New Yorkers off subways


    Cuomo on March 18th:
    “That is not going to happen, shelter in place, for New York City. I wouldn’t approve shelter in place.”



  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    This thread is gonna leave a mark.



    Biden called Republicans "frankly ridiculous" for relying on comments he made in 1992 about the dangers of holding Supreme Court confirmation hearings in the midst of presidential elections.


    https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-merrick-garland-supreme-court-2016-3

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    4,170
    Thanks
    2,958
    Thanked 2,455 Times in 1,667 Posts
    Groans
    683
    Groaned 587 Times in 505 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    No dice.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Biden said the so-called rule that supposedly prevents Supreme Court nominations in an election year "doesn't exist."



    https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-merrick-garland-supreme-court-2016-3

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    "I was responsible for eight justices and nine total nominees on the Supreme Court — more than, I hate to say this, anyone alive," he said. "Some I supported, a few I voted against. But in all that time, every nominee was greeted by committee members, every nominee got a committee hearing, every nominee got out of the committee even if they didn't have sufficient votes to pass within the committee."

    He continued: "Every nominee, including Justice Kennedy in an election year, got an up-and-down vote. Not much of the time. Not most of the time, every single solitary time. To now hear all this talk about the Biden rule, it's frankly ridiculous. There is no Biden rule, it doesn't exist."



    https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-merrick-garland-supreme-court-2016-3

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    93,491
    Thanks
    107,506
    Thanked 21,206 Times in 17,718 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,922 Times in 2,664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    This thread is gonna leave a mark.



    Biden called Republicans "frankly ridiculous" for relying on comments he made in 1992 about the dangers of holding Supreme Court confirmation hearings in the midst of presidential elections.


    https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-merrick-garland-supreme-court-2016-3
    They always do.
    Mayor de Blasio on March 5th:
    Coronavirus fears shouldn’t keep New Yorkers off subways


    Cuomo on March 18th:
    “That is not going to happen, shelter in place, for New York City. I wouldn’t approve shelter in place.”



  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Trump has time to fill the vacant seat on the Supreme Court


  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    93,491
    Thanks
    107,506
    Thanked 21,206 Times in 17,718 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,922 Times in 2,664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    No dice.
    ^No brains.

    Mayor de Blasio on March 5th:
    Coronavirus fears shouldn’t keep New Yorkers off subways


    Cuomo on March 18th:
    “That is not going to happen, shelter in place, for New York City. I wouldn’t approve shelter in place.”



  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    60,063
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    They always do.
    Indeed. The left is reduced to gibbering in oversized fonts. Their panic is palpable.

    Without RBG's clerk to cast the deciding vote, how can they steal the election now?

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    4,170
    Thanks
    2,958
    Thanked 2,455 Times in 1,667 Posts
    Groans
    683
    Groaned 587 Times in 505 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    You bored or something, Truthie? Go chase a ball around the yard.

  16. The Following User Groans At Crocodile For This Awful Post:

    Earl (09-19-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Big Tech Won The Popular Vote In 2016
    By Flanders in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-30-2019, 10:02 AM
  2. Exact Vote Count 2016
    By Evmetro in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-21-2019, 10:27 AM
  3. Jeff Flake requests a delay on the floor vote
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 162
    Last Post: 09-29-2018, 11:06 AM
  4. I'm casting a 'protest vote' in 2016
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-15-2016, 01:25 PM
  5. Replies: 57
    Last Post: 01-22-2008, 08:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •