Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 30

Thread: One of the rare times I agree with Chuck U Schumer

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,366
    Thanks
    13,043
    Thanked 14,578 Times in 9,986 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 873 Times in 830 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    For sure. The left won't win a decision for a very long time. ..


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Stone For This Post:

    ExpressLane (09-19-2020)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,239 Times in 13,964 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    The left will win decisions that are consistent with the constitution. But the left will be done with legislating from the bench for a very long time.
    It wasn’t the left that gave us Holder nor Citizens United

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,910
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,758 Times in 4,508 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Conservatives complained about "activist" judges and legislating from the bench.Then, they complained about Roberts because he is not an activist who legislates from the bench. When he voted to uphold the ACA that is deferring to legislative branch actions. Voting to overturn the ACA is activist.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    christiefan915 (09-19-2020)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,179
    Thanks
    27,003
    Thanked 20,176 Times in 14,712 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    So?

    It's the Senate's responsibility to fill SCOTUS vacancies. McConnell & the GOP put politics over tradition & what the founders intended.
    The Senate is not a rubber stamp. They confirm who they think is worthy of the job. When the President's party does not hold the Senate a Supreme court nominee has not been confirmed in an election year since 1890.

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    20,616
    Thanks
    1,820
    Thanked 11,241 Times in 6,872 Posts
    Groans
    892
    Groaned 1,850 Times in 1,713 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    The Senate is not a rubber stamp. They confirm who they think is worthy of the job. When the President's party does not hold the Senate a Supreme court nominee has not been confirmed in an election year since 1890.
    What does "party" have to do w/ it?

    It's not political. Party is irrelevant. That's very poor spin.

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,454
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 1,037 Times in 727 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 372 Times in 345 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Hiden View Post
    Our schools are segregated now thanks to marxists like you

    Slavery? That is so played out it only deserves to be laughed at

    BOO!!!!
    Get your panties untangled. No need to get upset.

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,910
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,758 Times in 4,508 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    It wasn’t the left that gave us Holder nor Citizens United
    It was voting to uphold the Constitution by defending the 1st Amendment and against laws based on outdated data.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,910
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,758 Times in 4,508 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    The Senate is not a rubber stamp. They confirm who they think is worthy of the job. When the President's party does not hold the Senate a Supreme court nominee has not been confirmed in an election year since 1890.
    That is the whole point in having a Senate majority. Whether it is an election year or not is a false issue used for argument sake. The issue is that the majority party wants to confirm or prevent the confirmation of an appointment based on the party of the president.

  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,179
    Thanks
    27,003
    Thanked 20,176 Times in 14,712 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    It wasn’t the left that gave us Holder nor Citizens United
    So?

  12. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default



    SLOW JOE SAID GO! GO! GO!


    "I know there is an argument that no nominee should be voted on in the last year of a presidency.

    But there is nothing in the Constitution — or our history — to support this view.

    Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was confirmed in the last year of Ronald Reagan’s second term.

    I know. I was chairman of the Judiciary Committee at the time. And we promptly gave him a hearing, a vote in committee and a full vote on the floor.

    I hope that Republican leaders will take a step back and think about what they are doing. I hope they will think about the oaths they have taken. I hope they will think about their responsibility to the voters of this nation. And I hope they will think about their role in upholding the integrity of the United States Senate.

    If they love the Senate as much as I do, they need to act".


    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/04/opinion/joe-biden-the-senates-duty-to-advise-and-consent.html

  13. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,179
    Thanks
    27,003
    Thanked 20,176 Times in 14,712 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    What does "party" have to do w/ it?

    It's not political. Party is irrelevant. That's very poor spin.
    Have you looked at the votes for and against nominees to the Supreme court? Do that and you will answer your own question.


    https://www.senate.gov/legislative/n...789present.htm

  14. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,179
    Thanks
    27,003
    Thanked 20,176 Times in 14,712 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    It wasn’t the left that gave us Holder nor Citizens United
    And they were constitutional decisions. So you will win the decisions that are constitutional. But knowing your side that won't be many.

  15. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    11,390
    Thanks
    476
    Thanked 4,028 Times in 3,012 Posts
    Groans
    398
    Groaned 234 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    You are missing the point, it is Mitch who made it a big deal, the GOP out there yelling elections this close, and that was ten months away, should be the judge, let the American public decide, same argument many used last February, and now they want to ramrod a selection thru, the hypocrisy is there for all to see
    Hypocrisy in politics?

    OMG

    If that is all you have, then just take your medicine. We don't care. Now on the plus side you will likely have some RINO defections like Collins, Murcuntski and Pierre Delecto. Mitch can't afford more than three with Pence making tie breaking vote.

    Even if they lose the vote, I want them to take it. I want everyone on record right before the election

  16. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExpressLane View Post
    Have you looked at the votes for and against nominees to the Supreme court? Do that and you will answer your own question.


    https://www.senate.gov/legislative/n...789present.htm
    You're asking a leftist to research the issue and think for themselves?

  17. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Hiden View Post
    Hypocrisy in politics?

    OMG

    If that is all you have, then just take your medicine. We don't care. Now on the plus side you will likely have some RINO defections like Collins, Murcuntski and Pierre Delecto. Mitch can't afford more than three with Pence making tie breaking vote.

    Even if they lose the vote, I want them to take it. I want everyone on record right before the election


Similar Threads

  1. Chuck Schumer
    By Tkaffen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-01-2018, 05:46 PM
  2. Chuck “bitch” Schumer in the news
    By J Craft in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 07-15-2018, 05:58 PM
  3. I wish I could make this stuff up. Chuck Schumer is a racist
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2017, 01:30 PM
  4. Chuck Schumer's idea of #ABetterDeal is Trump's agenda, WTF Chuck LOL
    By Pappy Jones in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-02-2017, 07:04 PM
  5. Dem Senator Chuck Schumer, Creepy Matchmaker
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-21-2012, 08:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •