Cancel 2020.2 (09-18-2020)
Cancel 2020.2 (09-18-2020)
He cares about himself and wealth.
That's what he cares about.
What is in it for HIM?
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Cancel 2020.2 (09-18-2020)
Cancel 2020.2 (09-18-2020)
I don't think this site should allow intentional hijacking of threads.
Just my 2 cents.
PoliTalker (09-18-2020)
Cancel 2020.2 (09-20-2020)
... in WORD, so as to not fear monger and cause mass panic about that which was not well known at the time.
He didn't, in ACTION. He took action (closing down borders) BEFORE he did the dialogue with Woodward, WHILE DEMS were downplaying it in words AND action, calling Trump xenophobic and racist and saying that Trump was fear mongering... You, like other Dems, wish to forget about the timeline of events and to rewrite history...
No, that's what DEMS do all the time... That's what they're doing in this case too... THEY initially downplayed the virus in both word AND action, calling Trump xenophobic and racist and criticizing the border closing actions that he was taking at the time, which occurred BEFORE the Woodward dialogue occurred...
Now, Dems are trying to act like THEY have always upplayed it and that Trump has always downplayed it and didn't do anything... Dems are liars... Dems are attempting to rewrite history...
Dems are also now FINALLY (in lying word only) condemning the violence and vandalism that has been occurring in the streets, after MONTHS of outright denying that such violence and vandalism has been occurring (remember "fiery, but mostly peaceful protests"??) ... Obviously their internal polling isn't looking so great ATM, so now they're trying to save face...
The Democrat Party are lying, cheating, sniveling, violent, hate-filled, bigoted, racist, controlling, demanding, intrusive, obstructive, crime-loving, pedo-loving, occult-loving Satanic fucks who will one day receive a one-way ticket to the lake of fire. Fuck the Democrat Party.
Cancel 2020.2 (09-20-2020)
Cancel 2020.2 (09-20-2020)
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Cancel 2020.2 (09-20-2020)
Phantasmal (09-18-2020)
Hello BartenderElite,
Oh, it's not so bad. The good thing about fewer rules is that it keeps the mod duties as minimal as possible. That's important for longevity.
I've been on other sites that had more rules, which kept the mods busy with complaint resolution. Eventually things go unaddressed, the rules become meaningless, site goes downhill, eventually they just pull it altogether because it is a big PITA and they got the site hits they were looking for to sell some ads.
This site has stood the test of time pretty much just as it is. It works because it generates volume. Sure, most of the traffic is junk but there are some nuggets if you know how to filter out the garbage and are willing to do it. I don't wanna feed the trolls myself but I understand that others can't resist, and that generates volume, keeps things moving along. It all works.
And, since it isn't a rule it becomes a test of personality, and a fair charge during discussions. If somebody has a weak argument, or no argument basically, and they try to hijack a thread because they can't stand what has been said and want to scroll it off, then it becomes fair play to call them on it. The evidence is right there in the thread.
Also, not to belabor the obvious, if there was a no thread hijacking rule we would not be able to talk about thread hijacking in a thread about double-talking DT contradicting his own words.
I guess "DT" can stand for more than one thing...
Last edited by PoliTalker; 09-18-2020 at 08:47 AM.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Cancel 2020.2 (09-20-2020)
"I always wanted to downplay it"
"I didn't downplay it"
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Phantasmal (09-18-2020)
We only had about 55% turnout in the 2016 election.
70% turnout would probably mean a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate for the Democrats.
80% turnout would probably give Democrats a 66-seat majority in the Senate, and a 2/3 majority in the House.
90% turnout would result in probably less than 25 elected Conservatives in the House.
The more people who vote, the less likely Conservatives are to win.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Bookmarks