Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Hermes Thoth, The Anonymous, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Legion Troll, Boris The Animal, canceled.2021.2, MAGA MAN, CFM, Superfreak, TOP, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, Terri4Trump, Lord Yurt, Cancel 2020.2 and OG Yurt


Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 214

Thread: First ever presidential endorsement by Scientific American

  1. #136 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,990
    Thanks
    12,115
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    you are confused.

    my digging is just pointing out how you are an idiot easily fooled by shiny things
    Got a ladder? You need it, dumbfuck.

  2. #137 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6,476
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,699 Times in 2,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 56 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    America's preeminent scientific journal
    No serious scientist lets Scientific American corrode his bandwidth. That "magazine" only has "Science" in its name to enable desperate warmizombies in fueling their fantasies of relevance. Any position held by Scientific American, however, is simply wrong.


    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden
    Of course. They're batting 1.000 in "getting it wrong."
    Global Warming violates the 1st LoT by claiming a magical creation of thermal energy out of nothing, in the form of a temperature increase, which is somehow caused by a magical substance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates Stefan-Boltzmann and black body science by claiming that an increase in earth's temperature is somehow caused by a decrease in earth's radiance.
    Greenhouse Effect violates the 2nd LoT by claiming that the cooler atmosphere somehow heats the warmer earth's surface.

  3. #138 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    I can see your ass still hurts from the beatings Micabwer. Feel free to take another one.
    That'll be the day- Buddy Holly

  4. #139 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,591
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Got a ladder? You need it, dumbfuck.
    after proving they pull the same basic stunt every 4 years, you are left to just troll

    I will let you have the last word shit stain - you bore me with your lack of actual debate

  5. #140 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Exactly. We subscribers made up our minds long ago. Guess who we do not support? lol
    It is amazing that an editorial board of a science magazine thought it so important to make the statement. It must be hard to go unsung when a party
    is incessantly attacking what it is you do and stand for. Personally I think they should have resisted the impulse.

    If the Republican party insists on branding itself the anti science party, well, they will go the way of the dodo bird. After all, it's science. It doesn't care.
    They will die out due to horrible results and failure to adapt. Foot dragging is not a genetic trait that protects an animal in it's niche, be it a jungle or a political jungle.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (09-16-2020)

  7. #141 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton, Oh
    Posts
    3,663
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    What most dipshits won't realize is that once facts become political, we go down the fucking drain. We sit here bitching about what is true based on personal biases rather than the evidence that derived those facts. Scientific-American has never endorsed a president because they are supporting fact based approaches to solve problems. But now, we have a president who basically refuses to acknowledge facts, and just responds with 'Nuh uh', and all his supports chant 'Yay! Way to tell 'em! I'm on team dumbass!' It's gotten fucking ridiculous. So, here we are. Science doesn't support this administration, because he's a dumbass who doesn't listen, and his supporters are right there with him.
    You Are Not So Smart Podcast - A celebration of Self-Delusion

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DigitalDave For This Post:

    Micawber (09-16-2020), ThatOwlWoman (09-16-2020), Tranquillus in Exile (09-16-2020)

  9. #142 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Our president also knows that stealth planes are invisible to the naked eye, which would explain why nobody saw them take off from airports in the Revolutionary War.
    It all fits!

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Tranquillus in Exile For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (09-16-2020)

  11. #143 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,403
    Thanks
    101,944
    Thanked 54,780 Times in 33,639 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalDave View Post
    What most dipshits won't realize is that once facts become political, we go down the fucking drain. We sit here bitching about what is true based on personal biases rather than the evidence that derived those facts. Scientific-American has never endorsed a president because they are supporting fact based approaches to solve problems. But now, we have a president who basically refuses to acknowledge facts, and just responds with 'Nuh uh', and all his supports chant 'Yay! Way to tell 'em! I'm on team dumbass!' It's gotten fucking ridiculous. So, here we are. Science doesn't support this administration, because he's a dumbass who doesn't listen, and his supporters are right there with him.
    Dave! Long time no see! Welcome back

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    DigitalDave (09-16-2020), ThatOwlWoman (09-16-2020)

  13. #144 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,591
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalDave View Post
    What most dipshits won't realize is that once facts become political, we go down the fucking drain. We sit here bitching about what is true based on personal biases rather than the evidence that derived those facts. Scientific-American has never endorsed a president because they are supporting fact based approaches to solve problems. But now, we have a president who basically refuses to acknowledge facts, and just responds with 'Nuh uh', and all his supports chant 'Yay! Way to tell 'em! I'm on team dumbass!' It's gotten fucking ridiculous. So, here we are. Science doesn't support this administration, because he's a dumbass who doesn't listen, and his supporters are right there with him.
    you are full of shit

    every 4 years they enter the politician fray to help democrats. every 4 years. it is verifiably proven

    this has simply become a think tank for one political party.

  14. #145 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton, Oh
    Posts
    3,663
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Dave! Long time no see! Welcome back
    Glad to see some familiar faces still lurking about
    You Are Not So Smart Podcast - A celebration of Self-Delusion

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to DigitalDave For This Post:

    Phantasmal (09-16-2020)

  16. #146 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton, Oh
    Posts
    3,663
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    you are full of shit

    every 4 years they enter the politician fray to help democrats. every 4 years. it is verifiably proven

    this has simply become a think tank for one political party.
    Then prove it....
    You Are Not So Smart Podcast - A celebration of Self-Delusion

  17. #147 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    10,591
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,613 Posts
    Groans
    183
    Groaned 216 Times in 211 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalDave View Post
    Then prove it....
    I already did shit stain

    I posted to the 2016 and 2012 articles



    idiot

  18. #148 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    That'll be the day- Buddy Holly
    It has been many days, over years Micabwer. You must have that shit or go blind syndrome.

  19. #149 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton, Oh
    Posts
    3,663
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zymurgy View Post
    you are full of shit

    every 4 years they enter the politician fray to help democrats. every 4 years. it is verifiably proven

    this has simply become a think tank for one political party.
    So they warned of the anti-science stances of Trump in 2016 (which they were right on), and mentioned that a Republican was worried that the party was going to be known as the Anti-Science party (which it is now). Well shit, they sure as fuck called that!
    You Are Not So Smart Podcast - A celebration of Self-Delusion

  20. #150 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,631
    Thanks
    46,762
    Thanked 68,643 Times in 51,927 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    So for the magazine's first 172 years - through both Republican and Democratic administrations - the magazine was non partisan, and only supposedly became partisan in the last 3 years?

    It dies not sound like a credible excuse.

    It actually sounds like something you pulled out of your ass

    You know what sounds more credible?

    That a science advocacy magazine would be horrified that Donald Trumpf thinks global warming is a Chinese hoax, and alarmed that Trumpf cannot lead a national response to a pandemic and has squandered U.S. leadership on the control of infectious diseases.
    The problem goes to credibility. It's like virginity; you can't unfuck a virgin. Once a credible, non-partisan, scientific magazine enters politics, then they are no longer a credible, non-partisan, scientific magazine. They are something in between. They can't unfuck it so I expect you'll see them become even more political in the future.

    Maybe this is just a marketing scheme in a country that reads more issues of People than Scientific American. It is, after all, all about the money with any corporation.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Doc Dutch For This Post:

    Sailor (09-16-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Scientific Publishing Is A Rip-Off
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-08-2018, 05:54 AM
  2. Replies: 129
    Last Post: 11-01-2017, 07:27 PM
  3. APP - the folly of certainty when your future depends on it scientific american
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 07:00 AM
  4. Scientific Analysis of American Healthcare Problem
    By ib1yysguy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 04:28 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 04:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •