BREAKING: Federal Judge ORDERS Trump Campaign/RNC to prove "vote by mail fraud"

[tinfoil]

I understand that if given the opportunity, you would cheat and break the rules because you can't win honestly. And that's not just the election, it's everything. Your entire life has been nothing but a series of personal failures...so you have to cheat to make yourself feel less like a loser.

That's because you don't live an honest life, have never lived one, and will never live one.

Projection: The post

[LV426]

I read it was double the number of mailin votes that get rejected for sigs compared to at polling places

So then the system works. Clearly. So what's your problem?

You can't argue in one breath that absentee voting is rife with fraud, then in the next breath say that more fraud is sniffed out on absentee ballots than in person voting.

You just made an argument against yourself.

What a fucking idiot. This is the best Conservatives can do.

[tinfoil]

What's sad about your GIF is that a genuine one doesn't exist, so you have to superimpose that tacky red hat (that you will hide in your attic once Trump is gone) on it.

Total hack.

WTF?
Memes: How do they work?

What a fucking dork you are

[tinfoil]

So then the system works. Clearly. So what's your problem?

Both are flawed and you say they work? You are an idiot

[LV426]

Both are flawed and you say they work? You are an idiot

How are they flawed when you literally said in this thread that mail in ballot signatures are subject to more scrutiny?

[LV426]

Both are flawed and you say they work? You are an idiot

You: The system doesn't work, and here's proof of mail-in ballots being rejected because of signatures.

Everyone else: But...that proves the system works because the ballots were rejected over signatures.

You: DERP DERP DERP

[LV426]

WTF?
Memes: How do they work?

What a fucking dork you are

Ummm...are you Stone? Stone was who I was responding to.

[T. A. Gardner]

Trump's own voter fraud commission, tasked with looking into exactly all these claims, FOUND NOTHING.

Report: Drumpf commission did not find widespread voter fraud
https://apnews.com/f5f6a73b2af546ee9...ad-voter-fraud

So what is happening here is that you are deliberately and knowingly spreading propaganda on behalf of Trump in order to undermine the integrity of the election so that you can wholesale reject the results in 3 months.

Pathetic, transparent, shameful.

You should kill yourself. If I was as blatant a useful idiot as you, I would.

The operative word you ignored is: did not find WIDESPREAD voter fraud

Voter fraud happens. It happens frequently. It doesn't happen on a widespread / mass scale--at least not yet.

[LV426]

Both are flawed and you say they work? You are an idiot

Ah, I think I figured you out.

So your problem isn't the means by which anyone casts a ballot, your problem is that they're casting ballots in the first place.

[tinfoil]

Ah, I think I figured you out.

So your problem isn't the means by which anyone casts a ballot, your problem is that they're casting ballots in the first place.

Youre too stupid to deal with. Go smoke some crack and shoot a 5 year old in the head

[LV426]

The operative word you ignored is: did not find WIDESPREAD voter fraud

Ah, so all those bullshit examples you gave before, most of which are probably distorted bullshit you didn't take the time to vet because you're depressed and lazy, weren't supposed to prove your argument that there's widespread voter fraud so bad we can't do absentee voting en masse?

Then why did you post them if that wasn't your intent?

You have this nasty habit of posting something, then never answering for that thing you posted because it would belie your true intent here; which is to divide people and make everyone as miserable and depressed as you are.

How about instead of that, you fucking kill yourself?

[domer76]

I'm sure they'll likely start with this:

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

Then maybe this



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...s_143033.html#!

Or maybe this

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...re-its-all-to/

And this

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...ction-n2569417

Or, this

https://www.demos.org/sites/default/...s/Analysis.pdf

There's plenty of evidence voter fraud occurs and occurs frequently. No, it's not so rampant that it would change the outcome of a major election--unless the vote were close. In many state and local races--and these are important too--it is easier for fraud to change the outcome as the total number of votes is much smaller meaning even small amounts of fraud can result in bigger changes.

- 1,290? Holy shit!
- 28 million ballots not returned in 6 years. So? The article days: “ Although there is no evidence that the millions of missing ballots were used fraudulently...”
- Your 3rd article: “ The truth is that while there is no evidence of widespread and systemic abuses...”
- You’re 4th article: “ Overall, the disfranchisement of voters through antiquated voting systems, errors, mismanagement of registration bases, and intimidation or harassment is a far bigger problem today than traditional forms of election fraud.“ and “ Voter fraud appears to be very rare in the 12 states examined in that report. Legal and news records turned up little evidence of significant fraud in these states or any indication that fraud is more than a minor problem. Interviews with state officials further confirmed this impression.
• Notable election reforms of the past 10 to 15 years—such as the NVRA, more permissive absentee balloting rules, all mail-in voting in Oregon, and the enactment of Election Day Registration in several more states—have not facilitated voter fraud.
• Analysis of several cases of election fraud that have received significant attention in recent years sug- gests that some of the most notable allegations of fraud have proved to be baseless.

Checkmate, dumbfuck

[LV426]

Voter fraud happens. It happens frequently. It doesn't happen on a widespread / mass scale--at least not yet.

If voter fraud happened and happens as frequently as you seem to think, why wasn't Trump's own hand-picked commission able to find even a single case of it?

Probably because "voter fraud" is nonsense, and you're terrified at the prospect of having to eat plates of shit for conducting yourself as you have the last 4 years.

[LV426]

- 1,290? Holy shit!
- 28 million ballots not returned in 6 years. So? The article days: “ Although there is no evidence that the millions of missing ballots were used fraudulently...”
- Your 3rd article: “ The truth is that while there is no evidence of widespread and systemic abuses...”
- You’re 4th article: “ Overall, the disfranchisement of voters through antiquated voting systems, errors, mismanagement of registration bases, and intimidation or harassment is a far bigger problem today than traditional forms of election fraud.“ and “ Voter fraud appears to be very rare in the 12 states examined in that report. Legal and news records turned up little evidence of significant fraud in these states or any indication that fraud is more than a minor problem. Interviews with state officials further confirmed this impression.
• Notable election reforms of the past 10 to 15 years—such as the NVRA, more permissive absentee balloting rules, all mail-in voting in Oregon, and the enactment of Election Day Registration in several more states—have not facilitated voter fraud.
• Analysis of several cases of election fraud that have received significant attention in recent years sug- gests that some of the most notable allegations of fraud have proved to be baseless.

Checkmate, dumbfuck

Exactly like I fucking said in this post here:

Ah, so all those bullshit examples you gave before, most of which are probably distorted bullshit you didn't take the time to vet because you're depressed and lazy,

Conservatives are lazy fucking assholes who don't vet their sources, and are never held to account for it.

I bet if doxxing were on the table, you would see virtually no Conservative posters on JPP.

[Guno צְבִי]

Trump is setting up excuses for why he lost