Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    34,168
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,634 Times in 10,060 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,101 Times in 1,013 Posts

    Default Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility

    Were Harris' parents lawful permanent residents at the time of her birth?

    If so, then under the actual holding of Wong Kim Ark, she should be deemed a citizen at birth—that is, a natural-born citizen—and hence eligible.

    Or were they instead, as seems to be the case, merely temporary visitors, perhaps on student visas issued pursuant to Section 101(15)(F) of Title I of the 1952 Immigration Act? If the latter were indeed the case, then derivatively from her parents, Harris was not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States at birth, but instead owed her allegiance to a foreign power or powers—Jamaica, in the case of her father, and India, in the case of her mother—and was therefore not entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment as originally understood.


    https://www.newsweek.com/some-questi...pinion-1524483

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Shes eligible
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Celticguy For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (08-13-2020)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    34,168
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,634 Times in 10,060 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,101 Times in 1,013 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Shes eligible
    Link to where her parents..were not here on temporary visitors, student visas

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Were Harris' parents lawful permanent residents at the time of her birth?

    If so, then under the actual holding of Wong Kim Ark, she should be deemed a citizen at birth—that is, a natural-born citizen—and hence eligible.

    Or were they instead, as seems to be the case, merely temporary visitors, perhaps on student visas issued pursuant to Section 101(15)(F) of Title I of the 1952 Immigration Act? If the latter were indeed the case, then derivatively from her parents, Harris was not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States at birth, but instead owed her allegiance to a foreign power or powers—Jamaica, in the case of her father, and India, in the case of her mother—and was therefore not entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment as originally understood.


    https://www.newsweek.com/some-questi...pinion-1524483
    Starting early with that birther stuff.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    blackascoal (08-13-2020), Guno צְבִי (08-13-2020), Trumpet (08-13-2020)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    This is pissing up the wrong rope. They are and were American citizens.

    Obama? Notsomuch. Kamala Harris? Yes.

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Birthers are fucking morons.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Concart For This Post:

    blackascoal (08-13-2020), Guno צְבִי (08-13-2020), Trumpet (08-13-2020)

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,234
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,230 Times in 13,958 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Were Harris' parents lawful permanent residents at the time of her birth?

    If so, then under the actual holding of Wong Kim Ark, she should be deemed a citizen at birth—that is, a natural-born citizen—and hence eligible.

    Or were they instead, as seems to be the case, merely temporary visitors, perhaps on student visas issued pursuant to Section 101(15)(F) of Title I of the 1952 Immigration Act? If the latter were indeed the case, then derivatively from her parents, Harris was not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States at birth, but instead owed her allegiance to a foreign power or powers—Jamaica, in the case of her father, and India, in the case of her mother—and was therefore not entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment as originally understood.


    https://www.newsweek.com/some-questi...pinion-1524483
    Again, got to love it, attempting to pedal another birther conspiracy against a Black women only adds to Biden’s suburban female vote, keep up the good work

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    blackascoal (08-13-2020), Guno צְבִי (08-13-2020), Trumpet (08-13-2020)

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Were Harris' parents lawful permanent residents at the time of her birth?

    If so, then under the actual holding of Wong Kim Ark, she should be deemed a citizen at birth—that is, a natural-born citizen—and hence eligible.

    Or were they instead, as seems to be the case, merely temporary visitors, perhaps on student visas issued pursuant to Section 101(15)(F) of Title I of the 1952 Immigration Act? If the latter were indeed the case, then derivatively from her parents, Harris was not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States at birth, but instead owed her allegiance to a foreign power or powers—Jamaica, in the case of her father, and India, in the case of her mother—and was therefore not entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment as originally understood.


    https://www.newsweek.com/some-questi...pinion-1524483
    Completely wrong. The only people physically present in the United States that are not subject to US jurisdiction are ambassadors and their families and members of an occupying army. It has nothing to do with 'allegiance'. If you are here you are subject to our laws. You are a fucking moron, like the rest of the birthers. Please STFU.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Concart For This Post:

    Trumpet (08-13-2020)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Lansing Ks
    Posts
    34,168
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 14,634 Times in 10,060 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,101 Times in 1,013 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Again, got to love it, attempting to pedal another birther conspiracy against a Black women only adds to Biden’s suburban female vote, keep up the good work
    Take it up with leftest Newsweek

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/

    Newsweek racist now?

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Link to where her parents..were not here on temporary visitors, student visas
    Are you saying that all the Mexican, Central American, South American children born here are not US citizens?

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,234
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,230 Times in 13,958 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Why when those on the right as yourself keep echoing it, serves the same purpose

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    NO ONE GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU THINK AND NO ONE IS ASKING ...
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bourbon For This Post:

    blackascoal (08-13-2020), Guno צְבִי (08-13-2020)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,229
    Thanks
    9,683
    Thanked 22,612 Times in 17,052 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by volsrock View Post
    Take it up with leftest Newsweek

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsweek/

    Newsweek racist now?



    butt,...butt,...butt...
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,229
    Thanks
    9,683
    Thanked 22,612 Times in 17,052 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    NO ONE GIVES A FUCK WHAT YOU THINK AND NO ONE IS ASKING ...
    Yes. We know how influential you are....
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,229
    Thanks
    9,683
    Thanked 22,612 Times in 17,052 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Are you saying that all the Mexican, Central American, South American children born here are not US citizens?
    Most of their parents aren't.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (08-13-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Kamala Harris Doesn’t Think You Have The Right To Own A Gun
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-14-2020, 08:00 PM
  2. asg Supports Kamala Harris
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-12-2020, 07:13 AM
  3. Kamala Harris......LMAO!
    By Stone in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 08-11-2020, 08:06 PM
  4. Kamala Harris
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 07-29-2020, 12:26 PM
  5. Kamala Harris & Jim Jones
    By Flanders in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-08-2019, 09:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •