BLM Declares Looting "OK", Says It's "Reparations"

[LV426]

I never said I didn't get the job. I have never interviewed for a job that I did not get. I have been in the room that decided if others got the job many times. Some of those times we jumped over more qualified people for lesser qualified people based on their race alone. Personally I believe in a level playing field. The most qualified person should always get the job.

Sure Jan.

[IBDaMann]

And THUG LIVES MATTER continue to destroy any credibility they ever had (if any), declaring LOOTING "OK" CALLING IT "REPARATIONS", AFTER CONTINUED LOOTING IN CHICAGO.

I hope I'm not the only one who caught the joke ...

BLM is 70% Caucasian. The looting is "reparations" ... obviously for all the past wars throughout Europe resulting from Marxism.

.

[LV426]

As usual, you make erroneous assumptions and can't get the story straight. I watched the entire video of the woman attempting to justify looting. It wasn't Push but her distorted economic explanations that caused my response. My response was only about the woman's economics and did not mention race.

What about her economic explanations did you find objectionable? You never said. You just screeched about PUSH, which leads me to think you didn't watch the video because you got triggered.

If she said she learned it at the Chicago School for Economics, would you have a different opinion? Because guess what? Everything she said is taught at the Griffin School of Economics at UChicago.

[Into the Night]

.
BLM are just a bunch of Marxist cunts masquerading as a legitimate organisation. MLK must be turning in his grave.

So is Antifa.

Both are domestic terrorist groups. Both are racist. Both are just criminal thugs. Both are supported and funded by the Democrat Party.

[Into the Night]

Actually its criminal behavior.
If blm is encouraging it, time to prosecute

Correct. We must hold the supporters of this Catch and Release program accountable....the Democrat Party.

[LV426]

I never backed away from anything because I was never speaking for my wife or her feelings (another example of reading comprehension or knee-jerk conclusions). I just mentioned what I have personally observed. I never felt that was any kind of second hand badge of honor--that is liberal guilt mentality.

See, why would you invoke it then? That's the part that is tripping me up. I don't understand why you thought it was necessary for you to impose your white male view of someone else's experience. You robbed her of that platform. She might surprise you and end up offering a perspective on the discrimination she faces...but I doubt you'd ever have that discussion with her without trying to explain to her why she's wrong in what she feels or believes.

You think she's honest with you, but she's definitely not.

Most people who are discriminated against rarely confront those who enable that discrimination.

[IBDaMann]

Then you don't know shit, Flash.

Personally I find it strange that you would pride yourself in developing a personal relationship with shit.

[ExpressLane]

Sure Jan.

OK Moron

[Into the Night]

You don't know anything outside of the insulated world you have chosen to sequester yourself within.

Inversion fallacy. It is YOU that is denying history. It is YOU that is denying the Constitution of the United States.

[LV426]

Personally I find it strange that you would pride yourself in developing a personal relationship with shit.

I find it strange that it took you over half an hour to come up with that response.

[Into the Night]

She knows more than you because she's lived the experience as a black woman, and you've lived your experience as a privileged white man.

You are only capable of looking at things through your narrow, myopic perspective because you lack basic human qualities like empathy.

You will never understand her because you choose not to. That's not on her, that's on you. Grow the fuck up.

Racism.

[LV426]

OK Moron

I find myself resisting the urge to dig into your "hiring experience" because I know where the conversation is going to inevitably lead; to you saying things about yourself that you will never verify.

It's a boring tactic.

[Into the Night]

I never asked to be, nor do I want to be anyone's savior. I just want a country where everyone has equal opportunity to succeed. You don't. That's the difference between us.

Lie. What you want is Marxism, where only the 'elite' can succeed.

[Flash]

SHOCKING!

WHITE GUY THINKS WHITE SUPREMACY ISN'T RELATED TO PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION.

I also notice how you moved the goalposts from the United States to "the world".

That's your BoThSiDeS showing.

It was only your erroneous assumption that it was limited to the United States. The goalpost was never moved.

My exact statements were: "You obviously have a very limited view of the world and prejudice and discrimination if you think it is all related to white supremacy. It is a much more entrenched problem than you realize."

"I already know why there is prejudice and discrimination and it exists throughout the world often unrelated to white supremacy. I don't think white supremacy explains discrimination by blacks."

Why you would think the goalpost was the United States when both statements clearly refer to "the world" is curious.

[Irish]

Well they are Marxists. So stealing other peoples belongings is OKAY!