Members banned from this thread: Cypress, moon, domer76, Micawber, floridafan, LV426, Walt, Doc Dutch and Concart


Page 9 of 16 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 229

Thread: Bombs dropped on Japan saved millions of lives

  1. #121 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    So? Your point?
    I was responding to the guy that said Eisenhower only talked to Stimson, when in fact he made his opposition plain to Truman as well. That's my point!!

  2. #122 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    78,289
    Thanks
    31,088
    Thanked 13,129 Times in 11,701 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,366 Times in 1,352 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    There are a lot of completely immoral, condemnable & rogue actions that "work" and are "effective."

    It's more about what kind of nation we want America to be.
    One that wins a war if a nation attacks us.

  3. #123 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    78,289
    Thanks
    31,088
    Thanked 13,129 Times in 11,701 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,366 Times in 1,352 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Yep. Plenty of innocent mice who had nothing to do with the military bases.
    None. There are no innocent mice.

  4. #124 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default

    Thought everyone knew this.
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


  5. #125 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    78,289
    Thanks
    31,088
    Thanked 13,129 Times in 11,701 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,366 Times in 1,352 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Incorrect. Other nations have tested their own nuclear weapons and showed they had no qualms on using them against the USA and any other countries.

    See Cold War.
    They have never used them in combat. We are the only nation to do so. Semantics fallacy.

  6. #126 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    10,731
    Thanks
    4,096
    Thanked 4,265 Times in 3,123 Posts
    Groans
    1,077
    Groaned 266 Times in 254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irish View Post
    Thought everyone knew this.
    Oh that's right, schools don't teach history anymore. Only social justice, and grievances.
    Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.



    Abortion
    Pro-Choice
    Women's rights
    Women's Health


  7. #127 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    They have never used them in combat. We are the only nation to do so. Semantics fallacy.
    Duh?

  8. #128 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    None. There are no innocent mice.
    Tell that to my Japanese friend's grandparents and great-grandparents.

  9. #129 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 64 Times in 57 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 12 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    I suggest that you read this before pontificating, there was plenty of opposition to using nuclear weapons.
    Not among military leaders. And what non-military opposition there was never reached Truman's ears.


    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    Eisenhower met with Henry Stimson and Harry Truman in July 1945 to voice his grave misgivings before the bombs were dropped,
    No he didn't. He only met Stimson.

    Ike didn't meet to voice his misgivings. They were having lunch. Stimson raised the subject and asked for his opinion.

    It was indeed in July, but it was after the final orders to drop the bombs had already been sent out to the military, and after Stimson had departed the Potsdam conference.

    Stimson was not in contact with Truman again until after Hiroshima had already been bombed. Not that it would have mattered. Ike failed to convince Stimson.


    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    so stop lying!!
    Everything that I've posted is completely true.


    “There was one additional matter on which Eisenhower gave Truman advice that was ignored. It concerned the use of the atomic bomb. Eisenhower first heard of the bomb during the Potsdam Conference; from that moment on, until his death, it occupied, along with the Russians, a central position in his thinking. …

    “When [Secretary of War] Stimson said the United States proposed to use the bomb against Japan, Eisenhower voiced ‘… grave misgivings….’ Three days later, on July 20, Eisenhower flew to Berlin, where he met with Truman and his principal advisors. Again Eisenhower recommended against using the bomb, and again was ignored.”[7]
    This quoted text is untrue. Ike never spoke to Truman about the use of the A-bombs.

    It appears that the quote was sourced from Gar Alperovitz. He is a known fraud who has been busted for concocting many falsehoods about the A-bombs.


    Quote Originally Posted by Grajonca View Post
    I was responding to the guy that said Eisenhower only talked to Stimson, when in fact he made his opposition plain to Truman as well. That's my point!!
    Your point is wrong. Ike never spoke to Truman about the A-bombs.

    Being wrong is a frequent peril whenever relying on Gar Alperovitz as a source.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Anvil Kasseri For This Post:

    Earl (08-12-2020)

  11. #130 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil Kasseri View Post
    Not among military leaders. And what non-military opposition there was never reached Truman's ears.



    No he didn't. He only met Stimson.

    Ike didn't meet to voice his misgivings. They were having lunch. Stimson raised the subject and asked for his opinion.

    It was indeed in July, but it was after the final orders to drop the bombs had already been sent out to the military, and after Stimson had departed the Potsdam conference.

    Stimson was not in contact with Truman again until after Hiroshima had already been bombed. Not that it would have mattered. Ike failed to convince Stimson.



    Everything that I've posted is completely true.



    This quoted text is untrue. Ike never spoke to Truman about the use of the A-bombs.

    It appears that the quote was sourced from Gar Alperovitz. He is a known fraud who has been busted for concocting many falsehoods about the A-bombs.



    Your point is wrong. Ike never spoke to Truman about the A-bombs.

    Being wrong is a frequent peril whenever relying on Gar Alperovitz as a source.
    Give me a break, you're so misinformed!!

    At the Potsdam Conference in July 1945, General Eisenhower was among those who opposed the use of the atomic bomb against the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He argued that Japan was on the verge of surrender already, and that being the first to use such a fearsome new weapon would damage U.S. prestige in the international community just as it had reached its highest point.
    https://www.history.com/topics/us-pr...t-d-eisenhower

  12. #131 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,917
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,832 Times in 17,264 Posts
    Groans
    5,348
    Groaned 4,599 Times in 4,277 Posts

    Default

    there were plenty of militrary people who did not want the bomb used. https://www.historycrunch.com/reason...f-japan.html#/ Truman had his mind made up. It was not needed. The Japanese were already in peace negotiations. These people did not include religious leaders, scientists and many other Americans. America was not only the first country to drop an Abomb in the middle of a city, but we did it twice.

  13. #132 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Bombs dropped on Japan saved millions of lives

    "War is horrible. People are killed, maimed, emotionally destroyed. Property is destroyed, wealth is consumed. Even the winners lose in protracted wars. In war, the best way to lessen the suffering is to end the war quickly.

    This is why the United States and Japan should celebrate the anniversaries of August 6 and 9, 1945. The atomic bombs we dropped on those dates quickly brought WWII to an end saving many millions of lives.

    WWII in the Pacific was particularly savage. The Japanese believed in death before dishonor, and surrender was considered dishonorable.

    In the battles on island after island thousands of Japanese fought to the death, typically taking one American life for every 4 to 5 Japanese soldier deaths. Typically fewer than 5 percent of Japanese soldiers were captured, usually only those too sick or weak to fight or commit suicide. Many Japanese civilians on these islands died helping their soldiers or committed suicide; the videos of Japanese adults and children jumping off cliffs to their deaths are heartbreaking.

    The 73 million Japanese prepared to defend their almost 146,000 square mile homeland to the last man, woman, and child. Everyone who could fight was being trained and armed; children were taught to fight with spears. The death toll promised to be horrendous.

    The atomic bombs convinced the Japanese to surrender before the invasion.

    While the death toll from the atomic bombs was high, Hiroshima 80,000 and Nagasaki 40,000, they were not extreme in WWII. For example, the March 9-10, 1945 bombing raid on Tokyo took about 100,000 lives, the raids on Hamburg took about 42,000 lives, the raids on London took perhaps 50,000 lives.
    LISTEN: This Day In History

    Compared to the perhaps 60-70 million Japanese that might have died in the invasion of Japan, the death toll from the atomic bombs was low and a small price to pay for the lives saved.

    The quick Japanese surrender provided other benefits. Had the Soviet Union joined the invasion as planned, Japan may have been divided into US and Soviet sectors, like Germany, and changed the whole post-war history in Asia.

    Perhaps more importantly the world saw the destructiveness of these primitive bombs. These convinced the civilized world to avoid use of atomic, now nuclear, weapons.

    There are at least 150,000 American soldiers and perhaps a few million descendants of those soldiers who lived because President Truman dropped the atomic bombs on Japan. The Japanese people have even more reason to celebrate August 6 and 9, 1945 because nearly every Japanese citizen that lived or was born after WWII owes their lives to those bombs."
    https://www.fosters.com/news/2017080...lions-of-lives
    MAYBE SOMEONE SHOULD DROP BOMBS ON YOUR HOUSE & SAVE MILLIONS......

    It is always easy to sacrifice the lives of other ppl to presumably save lives of our loved ones, especially since their lives are of much less value..........
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  14. #133 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill View Post
    MAYBE SOMEONE SHOULD DROP BOMBS ON YOUR HOUSE & SAVE MILLIONS......

    It is always easy to sacrifice the lives of other ppl to presumably save lives of our loved ones, especially since their lives are of much less value..........
    Whilst I still think the A-bombs on Japan were unnecessary I should oint out that Americans never experienced mass bombing campaigns on their cities like London, Sheffield, Southampton, Belfast, Coventry, Hull and Liverpool or indeed Germany.

  15. #134 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 64 Times in 57 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 12 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by History Channel View Post
    At the Potsdam Conference in July 1945, General Eisenhower was among those who opposed the use of the atomic bomb against the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He argued that Japan was on the verge of surrender already, and that being the first to use such a fearsome new weapon would damage U.S. prestige in the international community just as it had reached its highest point.
    This article is incorrect. No one spoke out at the Potsdam Conference against using the A-bombs. Not Ike. Not anyone else.

    No one at any point during the war advised Truman against using the A-bombs. Not Ike. Not anyone else.

  16. #135 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 64 Times in 57 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 12 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    there were plenty of militrary people who did not want the bomb used.
    How come there are no records of this alleged opposition?


    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Truman had his mind made up.
    Maybe so. But there is also the fact that not a single person advised him not to use the A-bombs.


    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    It was not needed.
    Sure it was. Japan was still refusing to surrender.


    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The Japanese were already in peace negotiations.
    No they weren't.

  17. The Following User Groans At Anvil Kasseri For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (08-12-2020)

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Anvil Kasseri For This Post:

    ExpressLane (08-12-2020), Into the Night (08-12-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Early Mask use Saved Lives
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-23-2020, 06:45 AM
  2. Granny used a gun and saved lives
    By Lumberjack in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-08-2016, 01:37 PM
  3. Fifty years ago: The day America dropped 4 nuclear bombs on Spain.
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-21-2016, 05:37 PM
  4. If George Bush had saved millions of white people from cancer ..
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 05-03-2013, 04:57 PM
  5. should the u s of a have dropped the nuclear bombs on japan
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 07-18-2010, 11:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •