This message is hidden because Yakuda is on your ignore list because he is such a bore.
This message is hidden because Yakuda is on your ignore list because he is such a bore.
This implies that you believe I have the freedom to make my own decision about what to do with your body as well with my own if you are saying that you believe one living human can kill another living human.
Your belief does not enter the picture. If a human has a heartbeat then that human is a living human, irrespective of any belief you might have.
Incorrect. Being living is entirely sufficient to be living. No one gets to place additional subjective qualification requirements on any other living human to be considered "living." A man with no head that nonetheless has a heartbeat and is being kept alive by machines is being kept "alive."
So can we put you down as officially supporting the killing of a living human who has not committed any capital offense and who has not expressed any desire to die if you can find someone would consider it more convenient if the living human were dead?
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Why did Republican justice Warren Burger enact Roe V Wade?
Europe considers Nationalists & Social Conservatives to be the Right-Wing, which is actually the proper definition.
The first Leftists were for Democracy & Capitalism in the French Revolution, while the first Right-Wingers were for Monarchy & Theocracy in the French Revolution.
Are hicks good for anything? All you do is botch definitions & kill people!
There's no reason to define Libertarian as Right-Left wing politics.
The scales should be Libertarian - Authoritarian.
Right for tradition & hierachy, and Left against tradition & hierachy.
It's oafish to consider Libertarian Right-Wing, because it leads to freedom for everything on the Left, be it freedom for immigrants, outsourcing, loose border security, LGBTQ bars. Freedom for Pornography, degenerate Rap music, Hollywood smutty shoot 'em up films, Leftist media, Leftist Social media, Strip clubs, Leftist private colleges, and yada yada.
Libertarian should if anything be classified as the Far-Left!
A lot of Eastern Europe is definitely heading towards Authoritarianism as we speak, and that's actually a good thing.
You don't solve your culture, with Libertarianism!
I don't necessarily think Authoritarianism is so bad.
George W. Bush probably killed more in Iraq & Afghanistan, than Mussolini had in Ethiopia & Greece!
Besides, Germans in WW1 killed a lot too, and they were a Liberal Capitalist country during WW1, as they gased soldiers with mustard gas.
I think, some groups are just more violent, not a heck of a lot to do with policy. (Although policy might play some role)
By your logic, most of the champion economies in the past 100 years have been somewhat Socialist, according to your definition.
FDR achieved the fastest economic growth in the 20th Century USA history & his war time economy was definitely some what central planned.
National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than FDR of the USA had, and they were more central planned than FDR.
Franco's Spain in the Spanish Miracle achieved the 2nd fastest economic growth period in the 20th century and was some what central planned too.
Japan after WW2, in the Japanese economic miracle achieved the #1 fastest economic growth period in the 20th century, and was some what central planned too.
Modern China since 1990, has been perhaps the most miraculous, going from poorer than Africa in 1973, to a potential #1 power house, after achieving multiple decades of fast paced growth for such a huge country of such population & land area!
It depends who is in power. That's the problem with Authoritarianism. Even if you're lucky enough to get a benevolent dictator, the next guy might be a mass murderer.
And Authoritarianism isn't just a Dictatorship, it's also strict laws at the expense of common civil liberties. Would you really want to live in a country with no freedom of speech? What if you end up with a Stalin in power?
Maybe, but at least with checks and balances, we could keep them in line.I think, some groups are just more violent, not a heck of a lot to do with policy. (Although policy might play some role)
Poland had some strongman, like King Jan III Sobieski he killed the right people for the right reasons at Vienna in 1683 against Islamic intruders upon Catholic Europe, or Jozef Pilsudski in the Polish - Soviet war 1919 - 1920! The same applies to Jozef Beck's Poland, shared much in common Nazis, having boycotted Jewish goods, and applied stripping Jews from positions of power like lawyers, doctors or government jobs, and had Ghetto Benches, a segregation. Meanwhile, Jozef Beck's Poland went onto to be the first to fight Nazi Germany & splintered into Armia Krajowa the largest anti-Nazi resistance in occupied Europe, not to mention Zegota & the largest number of Jewish rescuers the Righteous Among the Nations.
Hungary's strongman Horthy had similar, Hungary dragged it's feet against Hitler's Holocaust, it's a bit of a manipulation to just call Hungary an Axis power, they also tried to make deals with the Allies, because Hitler was too extreme.
Actually, Ukrainians out of Anarchy in WW2 did far worse, in the masscres of Wolyn & Eastern Galicia, 100,000 Poles were killed, they burned Polish villages, hacked Poles with hack saws, axes, machetes etc.
Meanwhile, this was done out of basic Anarchy, there was no true Ukraine government, but rather Bandera's angry villagers & militias butchering Poles.
But, then again this is nothing new that Ukrainians were more murderous than Poles & Hungarians.
Look at the Massacre of Uman, or the Khmelnytsky Uprising, to mention all the Pogroms Ukrainians against Jews during the Russian Civil War.
Bookmarks