Right. You are coward #6. You do not oppose the killing of living humans who have committed no crimes and who have not expressed any desire to die. That's pretty sick. ... and you are too cowardly to publicly admit it because it would reveal how you are just a mindless tool for a political party that owns you.
christiefan915 (08-04-2020)
Sure. I had expressed it clearly in English but intellectual cowards usually get defensive in their need for further clarification.
I am counting cowards. One way cowards identify themselves is by lashing out at those who ask questions that expose their cowardice. For example, all it took to get you to chit in your pants was the following question:
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
To any reasonable person this question is easy-peezy-lemon-squeezy. Reasonable people don't run away from this one ... they just answer it, no problem.
Cowards, on the other hand, are ashamed of their support for the killing of living humans and are quick to ask "Why do you ask?" Those in this category are essentially 100% leftists who are mental slaves to some political party and are no longer allowed to think for themselves. Others simply arch their backs and hisssssss and claw and rush for their safe space.
This is the "lashing out" of which I spoke. Notice that you did not just simply answer the easy, straightforward question. Notice that you became snowflake-triggered, EVADED the question and threw up a defensive smokescreen of petty personal insults.
... but we can be fair. Let's give you a do-over.
Do you oppose the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die, ... and would your answer change any if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?
gfm7175 (08-12-2020)
Bookmarks