The Question that Makes Cowards out of Leftists

[IBDaMann]

How many leftists will own up to approving of the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has expressed no desire to die?

How many leftists will own up to approving of said killing if the justification is to make some third living human's life more convenient?

[jacksonsprat22]

How many leftists will own up to approving of the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has expressed no desire to die?

How many leftists will own up to approving of said killing if the justification is to make some third living human's life more convenient?

I give up, how many?

[IBDaMann]

I give up, how many?

You bring the count to one thus far.

[jacksonsprat22]

You bring the count to one thus far.

No one knows what you're talking about.

[Matt Dillon]

I give up, how many?

All of them. That's why they are leftist shitbags.

20%-ish or so (more or less) of the US population.

I tell ya what, there's not enough of them to come up with 81 million votes, that's for sure.

[AProudLefty]

How many leftists will own up to approving of the killing of a living human who has committed no crime and who has expressed no desire to die?

How many leftists will own up to approving of said killing if the justification is to make some third living human's life more convenient?

That's a nice trolling.

[CFM]

That's a nice trolling.

Seems you're too gutless to answer either one.

[IBDaMann]

Seems you're too gutless to answer either one.

It seems that you are tad impatient. You bring the count to two.

[CFM]

It seems that you are tad impatient. You bring the count to two.

I'm not a lefty and can't speak for what they'll admit or won't admit.

[IBDaMann]

I'm not a lefty and can't speak for what they'll admit or won't admit.

Do you oppose the idea of killing a living human who has committed no crime and who has not expressed any desire to die?

[IBDaMann]

Again with the nit-picking and lying.

Again with the EVASION and the dishonesty. Every time someone wishes to discuss the killing of living humans, you abruptly change the subject to medical procedures. Why won't you be honest enough to stay on topic?

Why do you support the killing of living humans who have committed no crime and who have never expressed any desire to die? Is it because you are a shitty person?

[IBDaMann]

[AProudLefty]

Seems you're too gutless to answer either one.

How do you answer a straw man? Nobody supports killing innocent people.

[IBDaMann]

How do you answer a straw man? Nobody supports killing innocent people.

I would ask you to stick with the wording of my question and not try to shift semantic goalposts. Leftists are generally required by their slavemasters to endorse and support the killing of living humans who have committed no crimes and who have not expressed any desire to die.

I don't use the word "people" because some WACKY leftists think dogs are people too. I specify "living humans." You shifted to the word "innocent" and that word is somewhat ambiguous. My question specifies the absence of having committed crimes, otherwise one could point to a situation in which someone committed a crime for which the penal code specifies the death penalty.

So, do you support the killing of living humans who have committed no crime and who have not expressed any desire to die ... and would your answer change if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?

@ ThatOwlCoward ... I know you are curious to find out whether I counted you amongst the cowards but you cannot ask without revealing that you read all my posts ... so for your convenience the answer is "Yes" ... you have been successfully listed among the cowards ... amont the TRUE cowards in fact ... and you don't have to worry; no one is judging you.

[AProudLefty]

I would ask you to stick with the wording of my question and not try to shift semantic goalposts. Leftists are generally required by their slavemasters to endorse and support the killing of living humans who have committed no crimes and who have not expressed any desire to die.

Proof?

I don't use the word "people" because some WACKY leftists think dogs are people too. I specify "living humans." You shifted to the word "innocent" and that word is somewhat ambiguous. My question specifies the absence of having committed crimes, otherwise one could point to a situation in which someone committed a crime for which the penal code specifies the death penalty.

So, do you support the killing of living humans who have committed no crime and who have not expressed any desire to die ... and would your answer change if the killing would make a third living human's life more convenient?

No I do not. And no the answer will not change.


I would advise you to seek professional help.