Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 108

Thread: Over 200 Democrat racists call on Biden

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,520
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,565 Times in 17,092 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    It is not racism. it is actually a response to racists like Evmerto. Black women actually exist in America and none have ever been on the court. If he seats one, that will about making the court more fair and representative.
    Throughout our history,there have been 113 Supreme Ct. Judges. 107 white men. 2 black men and 4 women. No black women, zero, nada. It makes sense to make the courts reflect the experience of all Americans.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    christiefan915 (08-03-2020)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    It is not racism. it is actually a response to racists like Evmerto. Black women actually exist in America and none have ever been on the court. If he seats one, that will about making the court more fair and representative.
    Throughout our history,there have been 113 Supreme Ct. Judges. 107 white men. 2 black men and 4 women. No black women, zero, nada. It makes sense to make the courts reflect the experience of all Americans.
    But if someone is given the position just because of their race, isn't that racism?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  5. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    But if someone is given the position just because of their race, isn't that racism?
    And yet the same people didn't whine about Kavanaughty.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    christiefan915 (08-03-2020)

  7. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    And yet the same people didn't whine about Kavanaughty.
    Was he given the position because of his race?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  9. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Was he given the position because of his race?
    He was given the position because of his religion and his stance on abortion.

  10. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    He was given the position because of his religion and his stance on abortion.
    That's always been how the Supreme Court works. People nominate people who share their beliefs. It probably would have been an issue if Trump said he would nominate a Christian. Democrats would say this is religious discrimination. But just saying he would nominate a "pro-life" Conservative is the norm.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  12. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    That's always been how the Supreme Court works. People nominate people who share their beliefs. It probably would have been an issue if Trump said he would nominate a Christian. Democrats would say this is religious discrimination. But just saying he would nominate a "pro-life" Conservative is the norm.
    You realize that the Evangelicals celebrated their success?

    No idea why people have a problem with Biden nominating a black woman. Isn't diversity a good thing in the SCOTUS?

  13. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    You realize that the Evangelicals celebrated their success?

    No idea why people have a problem with Biden nominating a black woman. Isn't diversity a good thing in the SCOTUS?
    The Evangelicals celebrated because they got another Conservative on the Court who is going to restrict abortion any way he can. But it's beside the point. Even if the Evangelicals cared about having a Christian on board more than anything else, the point would still be that Trump never said his goal was to put another Christian on the Court. If he did, there would have been a backlash.

    No, racial diversity is not good. But again, beside the point. Saying the next nominee is going to be a black woman is racial and gender discrimination. The fact that the media isn't destroying Biden for this shows how strong the anti-white bias is.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  15. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    The Evangelicals celebrated because they got another Conservative on the Court who is going to restrict abortion any way he can. But it's beside the point. Even if the Evangelicals cared about having a Christian on board more than anything else, the point would still be that Trump never said his goal was to put another Christian on the Court. If he did, there would have been a backlash.
    No they celebrated because a Christian man got on the Court. They pressured Trump and he promised and they won.

    No, racial diversity is not good. But again, beside the point. Saying the next nominee is going to be a black woman is racial and gender discrimination. The fact that the media isn't destroying Biden for this shows how strong the anti-white bias is.
    Why isn't racial diversity a good thing? Isn't that the message of MLK Jr.?

    And how is Biden having the "anti-white bias"? To be honest, I had to laugh at that one.

  16. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    No they celebrated because a Christian man got on the Court. They pressured Trump and he promised and they won.
    I'm sure they didn't celebrate when any of the Liberals got on the Court despite them being Christians too.

    Why isn't racial diversity a good thing? Isn't that the message of MLK Jr.?
    MLK was wrong. Societies generally function better when there is less racial diversity.

    And how is Biden having the "anti-white bias"? To be honest, I had to laugh at that one.
    He refuses to nominate someone who is white.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  18. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I'm sure they didn't celebrate when any of the Liberals got on the Court despite them being Christians too.
    Ain't that the truth.

    MLK was wrong. Societies generally function better when there is less racial diversity.
    That's another topic.

    He refuses to nominate someone who is white.
    Can you give me a citation for that?

  19. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Can you give me a citation for that?
    If he says the person he's nominating is going to be a black woman, then he's obviously making it out of the question to nominate anyone who doesn't fit that description.

    Imagine how the media would have reacted if he said he's going to nominate a white person.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

  21. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    If he says the person he's nominating is going to be a black woman, then he's obviously making it out of the question to nominate anyone who doesn't fit that description.
    You realize there's more qualified candidates out there? Nothing to do with race.

    Imagine how the media would have reacted if he said he's going to nominate a white person.
    They've been doing that since 1776.

  22. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    You realize there's more qualified candidates out there? Nothing to do with race.
    So why is he promising a Darkie? Why not just nominate the best person he can find?

    They've been doing that since 1776.
    Is racial discrimination ok or not?
    If context matters, why is Biden's discrimination ok, but earlier discrimination was not?

  23. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    You realize that the Evangelicals celebrated their success?

    No idea why people have a problem with Biden nominating a black woman. Isn't diversity a good thing in the SCOTUS?
    This is why I had you verify on another thread that you understand the difference between picking somebody who happens to be Christian or black and picking someone because they are Christian or black. Now you can see why I was concerned that you might conflate these two things in order to dishonestly gain political ground. Lefties just can't help being corrupt.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-03-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-20-2019, 10:44 AM
  2. Why are people so afraid to call racists racist?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-12-2018, 08:20 AM
  3. Steve Bannon - ‘Let them call you racists. Wear it as a badge of honor’
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-10-2018, 11:23 PM
  4. Racists call for killing
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-17-2013, 09:44 PM
  5. RACISTS CALL FOR KILLING!!!
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-17-2013, 03:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •