PoliTalker (08-06-2020), ThatOwlWoman (08-06-2020)
Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Hermes Thoth, The Anonymous, /MSG/, USFREEDOM911, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Legion Troll, Boris The Animal, canceled.2021.2, MAGA MAN, CFM, Superfreak, TOP, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, Lord Yurt, Cancel 2020.2 and OG Yurt |
All of the natural world, all of reality, is composed of quantum fields. What we think of as particles is a convenient fiction.
Sidebar: My prediction for the top five discoveries of the next 20 years:
Discovery of dark matter
Discovery of dark energy
Discovery of habitable exoplanets
Discovery of Ghengis Kahn's tomb
Unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity
Higgs boson examined as source of dark matter at the LHC
It’s been calculated that dark matter is around five times more common than regular matter – and yet, we still haven’t directly detected it. Many different types of experiments are trying to find it, and now CERN has joined the hunt, testing whether the famous Higgs boson could decay into dark matter.
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) probes the secrets of the universe by smashing particles together at incredible speeds. In doing so, new and exotic types of particles are often created, giving scientists a fleeting opportunity to study things that would be virtually impossible to come across naturally.
One of the most groundbreaking discoveries made by the LHC is the Higgs boson, in 2012. This long-hypothesized particle was the last remaining puzzle piece in the Standard Model of particle physics, believed to create the means by which other elementary particles gain mass.
Since its discovery, scientists have used the Higgs boson as a tool to probe other particle physics mysteries. The boson quickly decays into other particles, and it’s predicted that some may not be directly detectable by the equipment.
Given the Higgs boson’s role in “giving” particles mass, and dark matter only being detectable through its mass, the two should interact with each other. So for the new study, scientists with the ATLAS collaboration at CERN set out to check whether the Higgs boson may be decaying into dark matter.
https://newatlas.com/physics/cern-hi...matter-source/
PoliTalker (08-06-2020), ThatOwlWoman (08-06-2020)
I seriously doubt that Kahn's tomb will ever be found.
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Dark matter. That sounds racist and you therefore are a racist you racist!
Well, that is how the Progressive Left rolls these days isn't it?
cancel2 2022 (08-05-2020)
I doubt there will be any unification in the next 20 years.
Cypress (08-06-2020)
^ an attempt at rightwing humour.
^ Sounds like you have never heard of dark matter, which happens to be one of the most important research topics in physics of the last 30 years.
You appear to be deficient in rudimentary scientific knowledge. Let me guess, you think climate change is a Chinese hoax, the Earth is 6000 years old, and early humans kept dinosaurs as pets.
cancel2 2022 (08-07-2020)
AProudLefty (08-06-2020), Rune (08-06-2020)
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
cancel2 2022 (08-07-2020)
AProudLefty (08-06-2020)
Considering how many billions of dollars the Europeans spent on the CERN particle accelerator, it would be surprising if all they had to show for it was the Higgs boson, important though it may be. Perhaps cosmology will replace particle physics as the top dog in physics this century.
Why the Higgs Boson Discovery Is Disappointing, According to the Smartest Man in the World
It's been 35 years, and when it comes to new particles and the like, there really hasn't been a single surprise. (The discovery of neutrino masses is a partial counterexample, as are various discoveries in cosmology.) Experiments have certainly discovered things--the W and Z bosons, the validity of QCD, the top quark. But all of them were as expected from the Standard Model; there were no surprises.
At some level I'm actually a little disappointed. I've made no secret--even to Peter Higgs--that I've never especially liked the Higgs mechanism. It's always seemed like a hack. And I've always hoped that in the end there'd be something more elegant and deep responsible for something as fundamental as the masses of particles. But it appears that nature is just picking what seems like a pedestrian solution to the problem: the Higgs mechanism in the Standard Model...
If the Standard Model is correct, yesterday's announcement is likely to be the last major discovery that could be made in a particle accelerator in our generation. Now, of course, there could be surprises, but it's not clear how much one should bet on them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...BoCagIQAvD_BwE
I believe we have found Dark Matter ....................... here, at JPP.
Guno צְבִי (09-15-2020)
I do not see a career as professional comedian in your future
You obviously do not appreciate attempts to elevate the tone at jpp, and ever seek to lower it.
If particle physics and cosmology is not your bag, I am sure there are threads about human poop in front of Pelosi's house around here somewhere.
cancel2 2022 (09-15-2020)
Guno צְבִי (09-15-2020)
Apparently, dark matter cannot be any type of normal matter we simply have may have difficulty visually observing and confirming.
Gravitational micro-lensing studies seemingly rule out while dwarfs, brown dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes as the source of dark matter.
Dark matter is evidently some entirely unknown manifestation of physics we do not know about - some science journalists are speculating we need a new Einstein to make any fundamental breakthroughs in particle physics and cosmology.
Einstein thought the cosmological constant was his greatest blunder, but apparently in hindsight it may have been a mathematical description of dark energy.
Here is where science and philosophy diverge. Asserting that empty space has an inherent energy is purely mechanistic and has little explanatory power. IMO.
One of the simplest explanations is that it is a “cosmological constant” – a result of the energy of empty space itself – an idea introduced by Albert Einstein.
Many physicists aren’t satisfied with this explanation, though. They want a more fundamental description of its nature.
Our results show that about 69% of our universe’s energy is dark energy. They also demonstrate, once again, that Einstein’s simplest form of dark energy – the cosmological constant – agrees the most with our observations.
When combining the information from our map with other cosmological probes, such as the cosmic microwave background – the light left over from the big bang – they all seem to prefer the cosmological constant over more exotic explanations of dark energy.
https://scitechdaily.com/dark-energy...e-dispute/amp/
Bookmarks