Earl (08-06-2020)
Earl (08-06-2020)
You did it AGAIN. I also totally forgot about your FOURTH mode of operation:
1) Jew-hating bigotry.
2) Deflect with bullshit irrelevancies
3) Ignorantly butchering fallacies.
4) Stake out some ridiculously false talking point (only Democrats attack free speech...at every turn) and act baffled when people laugh at your dishonest stupidity.
What a child. Thanks for setting all this straight.
Earl (08-06-2020)
Earl (08-06-2020)
Earl (08-06-2020)
artichoke (08-07-2020)
Here are two really solid rules about the American Left today:
1) What ever they accuse you of they are doing themselves (Tucker says this all the time).
2) what ever they name something is wrong and is intended to mislead you...for instance ANTIFA are totalitarian thugs.
This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.
artichoke (08-07-2020)
Ad hominem fallacy.
Responding to your "ignorantly butchering fallacies" fallacy being debunked by assigning me some triggered motive is weak and lame.
And no, not only Democrats attack free speech. Trump wants to make it illegal to burn the flag.[/QUOTE]
1) Wanting something and doing it are two different things, dumb-ass.
Did you miss that part?
2) Flag-burning isn't free speech. At least not as protected under the 1st Amendment.
You resorted to an Ad Hom by saying people are laughing at me, sweety. I just pointed out that you're only saying that because you're #triggered.
That's nice, but you said only Democrats attack free speech. I was pointing out that Trump attacked free speech by saying that burning the flag should be illegal. You know I'm right, that's why you resorted to name-calling.Wanting something and doing it are two different things, dumb-ass.
Which Democrats have attacked free speech?
artichoke (08-14-2020)
Ah, back to #3.
The Stonebystone Playbook
1) Jew-hating bigotry.
2) Deflect with bullshit irrelevancies
3) Ignorantly butchering fallacies.
4) Stake out some ridiculously false talking point and act baffled when people laugh at your dishonest stupidity.
No, pointing out that you have four modes of operation, all of which constitute garbage debating skills, while also pointing out that people laugh at your stupidity is NOT the argument being ad hominem. It's an ad hominem attack being ADDED to the argument.
Try to keep up.
Bookmarks