That they're not spending on health care? It is about 20% of our GDP.
But they were tied to tax cuts...the tax cut created a deficit that had to be closed. So tax cuts are really a stealth attack on spending. We saw it happen in Kansas with their State University system after the Brownback trickle down failure.Any cuts to Pell Grants were not necessarily tied to tax cuts. You can do one without the other and we increase spending all the time without tax increases.
Ummm...if you get health insurance through your employer, chances are you are still paying premiums, deductibles, copays, coinsurance, hospital fees, ambulance fees, dental, vision, and prescription drugs. Those costs never go down, always up. The employer usually doesn't pay the full cost. They pay a portion and the worker pays a portion. So they're still paying money to a health insurance company instead of spending it in the consumer economy, where it has the highest multiplier effect.f the family has health insurance paid by the employer they are not spending more so they have more money to spend.
The average worker spends about $6K every year for health care coverage through their employer. PLUS another $1,500 a year in deductibles for a total of about $7,500 OOPE annually.
Two years ago, premiums used to be $5K.
So the average amount a worker pays in premiums has increased 20% in just a couple years.
That works from the assumption that the 150M workers that have employer-sponsored care don't pay premiums, deductibles, etc.hat still leaves millions of families not paying more for education and health care with more money to spend.
But nearly all of them do. It is very rare for an employer to pick up the full cost and not have the worker also pay a share.
Ah, so then you support raising the MW to at least $15/hr?Another complete lie. Arguing with straw men again.
Bookmarks